If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Radium wrote: PLONK (for X-posting) Plonks should be categorized....Like a category one plonk is a content plonk, and a category two plonk should be a wording plonk. (dirty language and the like) And, a category three plonk a method plonk. (like cross posting) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
"William Graham" wrote ...
"Alan Browne" wrote ... Radium wrote: PLONK (for X-posting) Plonks should be categorized....Like a category one plonk is a content plonk, and a category two plonk should be a wording plonk. (dirty language and the like) And, a category three plonk a method plonk. (like cross posting) I think "Radium" qualifies as his own category. The only remarkable thing these days is that anybody is still reading his/her/its effluvia. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
On 2007-05-30 19:41:07 -0700, Radium said:
Hail to VD. Death to VA. 1) VD OTN stock and processing is nearly impossible to obtain, today. 2) VA OTN stock and processing has been the de-facto standard for the past three decades. VD is dead, dead, dead. Get used to it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
On May 31, 6:22 pm, peterh5322
wrote: 1) VD OTN stock and processing is nearly impossible to obtain, today. How much do I have to pay, if I want it? 2) VA OTN stock and processing has been the de-facto standard for the past three decades. VD is dead, dead, dead. Get used to it. What are the logical reasons for such? My guess is politics and money. VD maybe older technology but it still kicks VA's @$$. Much in the same way Creative Music Synth [old SB16 FM synth] is better than M$ GS Wavetable SW Synth. Newer doesn't necessarily mean more advantageous. Some @$$holes decided it's a good idea to make VA technology, and then the whole world [being gullible as the world is] fell for that crap. As a result, the golden VD technology was left behind. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
On May 31, 11:09 am, Steve Kraus
wrote: Variable Density is good, but try to get a lab to print one nowadays. VD is like FM radio. VA is like AM radio. Isn't VD inherently noisier because you're working right in the medium densities that show film grain? In VA the black occludes grain and clear doesn't have it but graininess would affect the edges of the tracks so I don't know but it would seem like it would be better. The noise in VD is a mouth-watering, delicious, paradisiacal crackling [due to tiny black spots on the film] similar the baking of garlic bread in a clay oven full of hot bituminous coals. The noise in VA is a hellish stink of stinky, thick, foamy, tickly, itchy, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying fart of a human who eats stale, fat-free cheddar cheese, sticky milk chocolate, rotten lentils, and decaying cauliflower. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
On May 31, 3:12 pm, "Mat Overton"
wrote: Variable-Density is far better than variable-area. WTF did they even develop variable-are?. VA stinks. VD is the best type of analog optical film audio. Hail to VD. Death to VA. Also, let's make a ban on producing any magnetic film audio. Only optical film audio. Hail to optical tracks. Death to magnetic tracks. Except to seeing 2001 in 70mm and six track mag sound with added dolby noise reduction (on a cinerama screen)...... Still... The audio in an optical track is a mouth-watering, delicious, paradisiacal crackling [due to tiny black spots on the film] similar the baking of garlic bread in a clay oven full of hot bituminous coals. The fart of a magnetic track is a hellish stink of stinky, thick, foamy, tickly, itchy, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying human kakaa-gas of a human who eats stale, fat-free cheddar cheese, sticky milk chocolate, rotten lentils, and decaying cauliflower. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
"Radium" wrote in message ups.com... [...] The noise in VD is a mouth-watering, delicious, paradisiacal crackling [due to tiny black spots on the film] similar the baking of garlic bread in a clay oven full of hot bituminous coals. The noise in VA is a hellish stink of stinky, thick, foamy, tickly, itchy, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying fart of a human who eats stale, fat-free cheddar cheese, sticky milk chocolate, rotten lentils, and decaying cauliflower. Can you say synesthesia? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
GO AWAY....
-- Martin Harrington www.lendanear-sound.com 0414 913 247 "Radium" wrote in message ups.com... On May 31, 11:09 am, Steve Kraus wrote: Variable Density is good, but try to get a lab to print one nowadays. VD is like FM radio. VA is like AM radio. Isn't VD inherently noisier because you're working right in the medium densities that show film grain? In VA the black occludes grain and clear doesn't have it but graininess would affect the edges of the tracks so I don't know but it would seem like it would be better. The noise in VD is a mouth-watering, delicious, paradisiacal crackling [due to tiny black spots on the film] similar the baking of garlic bread in a clay oven full of hot bituminous coals. The noise in VA is a hellish stink of stinky, thick, foamy, tickly, itchy, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying fart of a human who eats stale, fat-free cheddar cheese, sticky milk chocolate, rotten lentils, and decaying cauliflower. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
"Radium" wrote in message oups.com... What are the logical reasons for such? My guess is politics and money. VD maybe older technology but it still kicks VA's @$$. Much in the same way Creative Music Synth [old SB16 FM synth] is better than M$ GS Wavetable SW Synth. Yes very similar, all four are obsolete technology not worth arguing about. Is dog **** better than horse ****? Does anyone besides you really care? MrT. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density is better that Variable Area
In article , Mr.T MrT@home wrote: "Radium" wrote in message roups.com... What are the logical reasons for such? My guess is politics and money. VD maybe older technology but it still kicks VA's @$$. Much in the same way Creative Music Synth [old SB16 FM synth] is better than M$ GS Wavetable SW Synth. Yes very similar, all four are obsolete technology not worth arguing about. Is dog **** better than horse ****? Does anyone besides you really care? Obsolete? The entire motion-picture industry would disagree. Modern VA optical tracks can actually sound really good with LED readers and Dolby SR (real SR, not the crappy cat. 222 "SR"/A). -- Scott Norwood: , Cool Home Page: http://www.redballoon.net/ Lame Quote: Penguins? In Snack Canyon? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable Density B&W Film | Radium | Film & Labs | 119 | December 18th 06 07:48 AM |
Variable Density Filters | wheel | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | December 1st 06 12:04 AM |
Variable Density B&W Film for monoaural audio | Radium | In The Darkroom | 8 | October 11th 06 05:12 PM |
Variable Density B&W Film for monoaural audio | Radium | Film & Labs | 8 | October 11th 06 05:12 PM |
Variable Density Greyscale Film for audio | Radium | Film & Labs | 25 | October 10th 06 04:31 PM |