A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

35mm for rain forests



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 05, 04:22 PM
Faisal Zubair Qureshi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 35mm for rain forests

Hey guys,

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.

Thanks.
- faisal.
  #3  
Old January 5th 05, 09:37 PM
Justin Thyme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Faisal Zubair Qureshi" wrote in message
.. .
Hey guys,

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.

As one other poster suggested, velvia with a tripod. For a cheaper option,
you could also try Kodak elitechrome ebx or fuji sensia 100 - again these
are slide films and you would need a tripod. For a Colour Negative film for
hand-holding, try Fuji Superia 800. It gives very nice colours, and seems to
have a very nice _quality_ to it, that I can't really describe - this could
stem from it's graininess i'm not sure.
Also, don't overlook the power of B&W in this situation. Without the lush
colours you will see things that you didn't see before. Rainforests usually
have dappled light, and things like lichens, fungi, and patterned leaves,
that can make a really nice effect in B&W.

Thanks.
- faisal.



  #4  
Old January 5th 05, 09:37 PM
Justin Thyme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Faisal Zubair Qureshi" wrote in message
.. .
Hey guys,

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.

As one other poster suggested, velvia with a tripod. For a cheaper option,
you could also try Kodak elitechrome ebx or fuji sensia 100 - again these
are slide films and you would need a tripod. For a Colour Negative film for
hand-holding, try Fuji Superia 800. It gives very nice colours, and seems to
have a very nice _quality_ to it, that I can't really describe - this could
stem from it's graininess i'm not sure.
Also, don't overlook the power of B&W in this situation. Without the lush
colours you will see things that you didn't see before. Rainforests usually
have dappled light, and things like lichens, fungi, and patterned leaves,
that can make a really nice effect in B&W.

Thanks.
- faisal.



  #5  
Old January 5th 05, 09:37 PM
Justin Thyme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Faisal Zubair Qureshi" wrote in message
.. .
Hey guys,

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.

As one other poster suggested, velvia with a tripod. For a cheaper option,
you could also try Kodak elitechrome ebx or fuji sensia 100 - again these
are slide films and you would need a tripod. For a Colour Negative film for
hand-holding, try Fuji Superia 800. It gives very nice colours, and seems to
have a very nice _quality_ to it, that I can't really describe - this could
stem from it's graininess i'm not sure.
Also, don't overlook the power of B&W in this situation. Without the lush
colours you will see things that you didn't see before. Rainforests usually
have dappled light, and things like lichens, fungi, and patterned leaves,
that can make a really nice effect in B&W.

Thanks.
- faisal.



  #6  
Old January 22nd 05, 08:53 PM
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.


Velvia and a tripod. Okay... it's a slide film.


Absolutely, slide film. But if you're going to be out there for a
long time, and if it's hot, the heat may degrade the film to the point
that you'll want to have a digicam.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases: http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  #7  
Old January 22nd 05, 11:30 PM
Dan Fromm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Faisal Zubair Qureshi wrote:
Hey guys,

What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor

at
the forest floor.

Thanks.
- faisal.


Faisal, the rain forests I've been in, in Costa Rica, Panama, and
Perun, have not had lush and vibrant colors. Under triple canopy its
all muted greens and browns. And its not all that bright. Take a
tripod or monopod, use a medium-speed, say ISO 100, slide film. EPN
give the most accurate colors. Come to think of it, much the same is
true of rain forests in the pacific northwest of the US.
Good luck, enjoy your travel,

Dan

  #8  
Old January 23rd 05, 04:16 PM
Alan Browne-
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dr. Joel M. Hoffman wrote:
What would be a good 35mm film for photographing rain forests, which
usually exhibit lush and vibrant colors. Also the light might be poor at
the forest floor.


Velvia and a tripod. Okay... it's a slide film.



Absolutely, slide film. But if you're going to be out there for a
long time, and if it's hot, the heat may degrade the film to the point
that you'll want to have a digicam.



It's easy to protect film from the heat. Just wrap it loosely in a
bunch of towels and keep out of the sun. And, gasp, film can handle a
number of days of heat without much effect.

People have been managing film in the heat for many decades. The advent
of digital hasn't made film more sensitve to heat.

Cheers,
Alan


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I need to transfer my digital files to 35mm slides and negatives output and other film format outputs? Chris Digital Photography 5 September 25th 04 07:43 AM
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 30 September 12th 04 04:46 AM
opinions on the equipment list Pallav 35mm Photo Equipment 7 September 11th 04 08:14 PM
Removing 35mm mask on Durst M606? Luigi de Guzman In The Darkroom 4 March 1st 04 04:09 AM
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner bleanne APS Photographic Equipment 1 November 27th 03 07:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.