|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
April 12th 08, 10:16 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
So What Do You Believe
1. Nikon is better than Canon
2. Canon is better than Nikon 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred. 
|
|
#2
April 12th 08, 10:28 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:16:06 -0700, measekite wrote:
|DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" htm1 head \head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"1. Nikon is better than Canonbr br 2. Canon is better than Nikonbr br 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred./font \body \html What do _I_ believe? You're an *BLUNDERING, IDIOT TROLL* than has no business on usenet.
|
|
#3
April 12th 08, 10:50 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
In article , Spam Trappe
wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:16:06 -0700, measekite wrote: |DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" htm1 head \head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"1. Nikon is better than Canonbr br 2. Canon is better than Nikonbr br 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred./font \body \html What do _I_ believe? You're an *BLUNDERING, IDIOT TROLL* than has no business on usenet. He's definitely a retard.
|
|
#4
April 13th 08, 02:52 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
Spam Trappe wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:16:06 -0700, measekite wrote: <|DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <htm1> <head> <\head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font face="sans-serif">1.&nbsp; Nikon is better than Canon<br> <br> 2.&nbsp; Canon is better than Nikon<br> <br> 3.&nbsp; One is not better than the other but they are different.&nbsp; Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.&nbsp; Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.&nbsp; The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.&nbsp; One is really not better but may be preferred.</font> <\body> <\html> What do _I_ believe? You're an *BLUNDERING, IDIOT TROLL* than has no business on usenet. ha ha ha
|
|
#5
April 13th 08, 02:54 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
JT's Ghost wrote: Joseph Meehan wrote: "Spam Trappe" wrote in message ... What do _I_ believe? snip Canon vs. Nikon, PC vs. Mac, Apples vs. Oranges, will always generate some sort of response. The OP is sort of trolling, but this is all a matter of semantics, and not the point of my reply. As always, YMMV. Wrongo Pongo - JT learns more by listening (reading), than by talking (posting).
|
|
#6
April 13th 08, 04:07 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
On 4/12/08 8:52 PM, in article , "measekite" wrote: Spam Trappe wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:16:06 -0700, measekite wrote: |DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" htm1 head \head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"1. Nikon is better than Canonbr br 2. Canon is better than Nikonbr br 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred./font \body \html What do _I_ believe? You're an *BLUNDERING, IDIOT TROLL* than has no business on usenet. ha ha ha You are not as cute as your mama told you. You are a festering abscess, as a matter of fact. Go **** yourself and eliminate the sore.
|
|
#7
April 13th 08, 04:04 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
So What Do You Believe
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:54:42 -0700, measekite wrote:
[... unreadable HTML omited ...] Since I've rid myself of all the Google Groups spam, your unreadable postings stand out like a sore thumb. In the more than two decades that I have been using Usenet, I have never written a filtering rule to block an individual's postings. I'd be willing to make an exception for you if you persist in posting with HTML turned on. Paul Allen
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
