If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
On 2012-05-31 06:22 , Bruce wrote:
Huuter wrote: On 2012-05-30 18:36 , Bruce wrote: Savageduck wrote: Why take Rich's word for the work submitted? Because I have seen the submissions and I agree entirely with Rich's comments. Here's a Tony "Bruce" Polson professional product shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/all6e7aqk8zs8vt/TP%20TEAC.jpg Then there are the choo-choo shots... So, really, you don't have much to contribute... as usual. Funny how Alan Browne can fake a Usenet post so it appears to come from somewhere exotic but still cannot produce a decent shot for the SI after nine years of not trying? To learn absolutely nothing about photography in NINE YEARS is quite a non-achievement. A non-award winner for a lifetime of non-achievement and failure. Isn't this what psychologists refer to as projection? Polson is so predictably vindictive. Ever since I called out Polson to "Walk the walk" and show his implied photographic prowess, he has been on my ass. So be it - good for a wry laugh if little else. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
"alan1browne" wrote in message ... On 2012-05-31 06:22 , Bruce wrote: Huuter wrote: On 2012-05-30 18:36 , Bruce wrote: Savageduck wrote: Why take Rich's word for the work submitted? Because I have seen the submissions and I agree entirely with Rich's comments. Here's a Tony "Bruce" Polson professional product shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/all6e7aqk8zs8vt/TP%20TEAC.jpg Then there are the choo-choo shots... So, really, you don't have much to contribute... as usual. Funny how Alan Browne can fake a Usenet post so it appears to come from somewhere exotic but still cannot produce a decent shot for the SI after nine years of not trying? To learn absolutely nothing about photography in NINE YEARS is quite a non-achievement. A non-award winner for a lifetime of non-achievement and failure. Isn't this what psychologists refer to as projection? Polson is so predictably vindictive. Ever since I called out Polson to "Walk the walk" and show his implied photographic prowess, he has been on my ass. So be it - good for a wry laugh if little else. Wow, what is it with him? Is he jealous or something? Granted, as stated, my shots are out of focus or washed out---my fault poor camera - technique etc. But what is it that drives him nuts about the SI, but yet doesn't contribute?! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
On 2012-05-31 17:30 , Tim Conway wrote:
Wow, what is it with him? Is he jealous or something? Insanely so. -- "Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities." -Samuel Clemens. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
On 2012-05-31 14:07:40 -0700, alan1browne said:
On 2012-05-31 06:22 , Bruce wrote: Huuter wrote: On 2012-05-30 18:36 , Bruce wrote: Savageduck wrote: Why take Rich's word for the work submitted? Because I have seen the submissions and I agree entirely with Rich's comments. Here's a Tony "Bruce" Polson professional product shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/all6e7aqk8zs8vt/TP%20TEAC.jpg Then there are the choo-choo shots... So, really, you don't have much to contribute... as usual. Funny how Alan Browne can fake a Usenet post so it appears to come from somewhere exotic but still cannot produce a decent shot for the SI after nine years of not trying? To learn absolutely nothing about photography in NINE YEARS is quite a non-achievement. A non-award winner for a lifetime of non-achievement and failure. Isn't this what psychologists refer to as projection? Polson is so predictably vindictive. Ever since I called out Polson to "Walk the walk" and show his implied photographic prowess, he has been on my ass. So be it - good for a wry laugh if little else. "Bruce/TonyP" has created a shell of a legend so he can function in in these photo groups. He down plays his role in sales at the "camera shop" establishment where he "works", saying he deals with used equipment in one breath, but has all the knowledge of an owner, or store manager when it comes to discussion via Usenet. I suspect that is to establish his "legend" as the gallant knight errant photographer of the usenet, who is never to be challenged. If challenged, he will pierce the offender with his lance of pompous scorn. Whatever happens he has firmly lodged himself into a mythology of expertise from which he cannot gracefully extricate himself. It has a "Walter Mittyish" touch to it. The behavior is an indication of deep insecurity and a lack of true self confidence. I often wonder if "Bruce/TonyP" has a genetic/psychological connection with the long absent "DMac" and his multiple persona. So much claimed, so little proven. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
On 2012-05-31 18:00 , Savageduck wrote:
On 2012-05-31 14:07:40 -0700, alan1browne said: On 2012-05-31 06:22 , Bruce wrote: Huuter wrote: On 2012-05-30 18:36 , Bruce wrote: Savageduck wrote: Why take Rich's word for the work submitted? Because I have seen the submissions and I agree entirely with Rich's comments. Here's a Tony "Bruce" Polson professional product shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/all6e7aqk8zs8vt/TP%20TEAC.jpg Then there are the choo-choo shots... So, really, you don't have much to contribute... as usual. Funny how Alan Browne can fake a Usenet post so it appears to come from somewhere exotic but still cannot produce a decent shot for the SI after nine years of not trying? To learn absolutely nothing about photography in NINE YEARS is quite a non-achievement. A non-award winner for a lifetime of non-achievement and failure. Isn't this what psychologists refer to as projection? Polson is so predictably vindictive. Ever since I called out Polson to "Walk the walk" and show his implied photographic prowess, he has been on my ass. So be it - good for a wry laugh if little else. "Bruce/TonyP" has created a shell of a legend so he can function in in these photo groups. He down plays his role in sales at the "camera shop" establishment where he "works", saying he deals with used equipment in one breath, but has all the knowledge of an owner, or store manager when it comes to discussion via Usenet. I suspect that is to establish his "legend" as the gallant knight errant photographer of the usenet, who is never to be challenged. If challenged, he will pierce the offender with his lance of pompous scorn. Whatever happens he has firmly lodged himself into a mythology of expertise from which he cannot gracefully extricate himself. It has a "Walter Mittyish" touch to it. The behavior is an indication of deep insecurity and a lack of true self confidence. I often wonder if "Bruce/TonyP" has a genetic/psychological connection with the long absent "DMac" and his multiple persona. So much claimed, so little proven. Ad nauseum. I don't really care about the little **** and I shouldn't lower myself to his level. -- "Civilization is the limitless multiplication of unnecessary necessities." -Samuel Clemens. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Macro/Closeup
On 5/31/2012 6:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2012-05-31 14:07:40 -0700, alan1browne said: On 2012-05-31 06:22 , Bruce wrote: Huuter wrote: On 2012-05-30 18:36 , Bruce wrote: Savageduck wrote: Why take Rich's word for the work submitted? Because I have seen the submissions and I agree entirely with Rich's comments. Here's a Tony "Bruce" Polson professional product shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/all6e7aqk8zs8vt/TP%20TEAC.jpg Then there are the choo-choo shots... So, really, you don't have much to contribute... as usual. Funny how Alan Browne can fake a Usenet post so it appears to come from somewhere exotic but still cannot produce a decent shot for the SI after nine years of not trying? To learn absolutely nothing about photography in NINE YEARS is quite a non-achievement. A non-award winner for a lifetime of non-achievement and failure. Isn't this what psychologists refer to as projection? Polson is so predictably vindictive. Ever since I called out Polson to "Walk the walk" and show his implied photographic prowess, he has been on my ass. So be it - good for a wry laugh if little else. "Bruce/TonyP" has created a shell of a legend so he can function in in these photo groups. He down plays his role in sales at the "camera shop" establishment where he "works", saying he deals with used equipment in one breath, but has all the knowledge of an owner, or store manager when it comes to discussion via Usenet. I suspect that is to establish his "legend" as the gallant knight errant photographer of the usenet, who is never to be challenged. If challenged, he will pierce the offender with his lance of pompous scorn. Whatever happens he has firmly lodged himself into a mythology of expertise from which he cannot gracefully extricate himself. It has a "Walter Mittyish" touch to it. The behavior is an indication of deep insecurity and a lack of true self confidence. I often wonder if "Bruce/TonyP" has a genetic/psychological connection with the long absent "DMac" and his multiple persona. So much claimed, so little proven. Did you notice that at one time he talked about Olympus people, who worked in a department that I had friends in, he failed to provide additional details and quickly stated he would not respond to my postings. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Macro/Closeup | SI Committee | Digital SLR Cameras | 58 | June 17th 12 06:01 PM |
[SI] Macro/Closeup | sid | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | May 31st 12 08:08 PM |