ALL A-BUZZ ABOUT THE 40D!

On 8/28/2008 8:53 AM Annika1980 spake thus:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/102304115/original

This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm,
which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital
cameras that look like 35mm SLRs.

Please use an appropriate newsgroup for postings on digital cameras. One
of the following groups would be a good place for such postings:

rec.photo.digital
rec.photo.digital.point+shoot
rec.photo.digital.rangefinder
rec.photo.digital.slr
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

(Note that the list of groups available to you depends on what your ISP
or news provider carries, and may differ from this list)


--
"In 1964 Barry Goldwater declared: 'Elect me president, and I
will bomb the cities of Vietnam, defoliate the jungles, herd the
population into concentration camps and turn the country into a
wasteland.' But Lyndon Johnson said: 'No! No! No! Don't you dare do
that. Let ME do it.'"

- Characterization (paraphrased) of the 1964 Goldwater/Johnson
presidential race by Professor Irwin Corey, "The World's Foremost
Authority".

David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 8/28/2008 8:53 AM Annika1980 spake thus:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/102304115/original

This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm,
which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital
cameras that look like 35mm SLRs.

Please use an appropriate newsgroup for postings on digital cameras. One
of the following groups would be a good place for such postings:

rec.photo.digital
rec.photo.digital.point+shoot
rec.photo.digital.rangefinder
rec.photo.digital.slr
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

(Note that the list of groups available to you depends on what your ISP
or news provider carries, and may differ from this list)



A sure sign of impending insanity is repeating the same action over and
over and expecting different results.

Your losing it dude.

* Draco wrote :
On Aug 28, 1:23*pm, David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 8/28/2008 8:53 AM Annika1980 spake thus:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/102304115/original

This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm,
which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital
cameras that look like 35mm SLRs.

Please use an appropriate newsgroup for postings on digital cameras. One
of the following groups would be a good place for such postings:

rec.photo.digital
rec.photo.digital.point+shoot
rec.photo.digital.rangefinder
rec.photo.digital.slr
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

(Note that the list of groups available to you depends on what your ISP
or news provider carries, and may differ from this list)

David,
If you don't like it, don't read it. If you read it, then cope.
This endless rant is not only useless but the sign of someone with to
much time on their hands. Get out and photograph something, huh?

Agreed.

In addition, he's a hypocrite who posts off-topic in the same
newsgroup he's supposedly doing this for:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.p...b240bcb7949061

And further more, for someone who is so vocal and pedantic about
what is right and wrong in newsgroups, his sig is way outside
RFC1855 Netiquette Guidelines.

--
Troy Piggins
I always appreciate critique.

Troy Piggins wrote:
* Draco wrote :
On Aug 28, 1:23�pm, David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 8/28/2008 8:53 AM Annika1980 spake thus:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/102304115/original
This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm,
which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital
cameras that look like 35mm SLRs.

Snipped bits out

If you don't like it, don't read it. If you read it, then cope.
This endless rant is not only useless but the sign of someone with to
much time on their hands. Get out and photograph something, huh?

Agreed.

In addition, he's a hypocrite who posts off-topic in the same
newsgroup he's supposedly doing this for:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.p...b240bcb7949061

And further more, for someone who is so vocal and pedantic about
what is right and wrong in newsgroups, his sig is way outside
RFC1855 Netiquette Guidelines.

And he crossposts! Doesn't set follow-ups!

But he's successful in generating replies, which may be his main jolly,
which leads to.......

--
john mcwilliams

Draco wrote:

If you don't like it, don't read it. If you read it, then cope.
This endless rant is not only useless but the sign of someone with to
much time on their hands. Get out and photograph something, huh?

This has been going on for what, a week now? Best solution is too
simply put him in the KF and let him bark at the bit buckets.


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

On 8/28/08 12:23 PM, in article
, "David Nebenzahl"
wrote:

On 8/28/2008 8:53 AM Annika1980 spake thus:

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/102304115/original

This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm,
which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital
cameras that look like 35mm SLRs.

Please use an appropriate newsgroup for postings on digital cameras. One
of the following groups would be a good place for such postings:

rec.photo.digital
rec.photo.digital.point+shoot
rec.photo.digital.rangefinder
rec.photo.digital.slr
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

(Note that the list of groups available to you depends on what your ISP
or news provider carries, and may differ from this list)

Your bloviated sig lines suck big-time, ya know?