1.6x body a complement to FF?

Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto
lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.

"Donald Specker" skrev i en meddelelse
news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07...
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with
telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.


To me it makes perfect sense as long as you can get the "angle of view" you
need (wide angle).

Max

On Sep 24, 11:34 am, "Donald Specker"
wrote:
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto
lenses, costs less than another 5D.


Of course it does. In that scenario, I'd consider the 5D as the
backup.

Donald Specker wrote:
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement
to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach
with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D.

It can be a good complement, if you do sports photography (for example),
the x1,6 crop factor can be helpfull !

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com