If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Thank you all for your responses.
My statement "extremely high resolution pictures of breathtaking clarity" was to be placed in the context of cameras within my price range and not in relation to industry cameras worth $20,000. Apologies for not making this clear in my original post. Of course, I would like to get as close to "extremely high resolution pictures of breathtaking clarity" as possible for my budget, as anyone naturally would. I've decided on the Nikon D40X as the body. However, I'm now seriously reviewing accepting the standard 18-55mm lens. One poster, namely Floyd L. Davidson, mentioned the 18-70mm Nikkor as a better alternative to the 18-55mm. Unfortunately, this is a little outside my budget. Although, I would have liked to make this upgrade. I think I'm going to have to stick with the Nikon D40X and 18-55mm lens for starters simply because I can get the two for £350 (700$). However, I've realised that I'm going to have to invest in another lens at a later stage. Your suggestions in this regard have been particularly useful and I have made careful notes of the suggested lenses and will now do some researching to learn more about each type. Thank you once again. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Doug Jewell wrote:
[] even the very best of the P&S's can't blow wind up a DSLR for overall image quality. In some circumstances a P&S shot may be practically indistinguishable from a DSLR (eg bright, even lighting), but overall the DSLR will win handsdown. In my own testing, the Pentax K100D (About as low on the DSLR scale as you can get) stood head and shoulders above the Canon A640 (one of the best compact cameras) when using the two side-by-side. There were a small handful of shots where you could barely tell the difference (mainly sunlit landscapes), but whenever the lighting was less than sunlit/flash, or the shot demanded the finest detail, the 6MP SLR was clearly superior to the 10MP compact. Even down to things like being able to focus on the eyes with the SLR, vs having focus somewhere inside the green rectangle and not really being able to tell for sure what it focussed on until the image was viewed on the computer afterwards. Thanks, Doug. At least you've actually done the comparison! What display format did you use for comparison - prints or what, and what size? Thanks, David |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Martin Humlark wrote:
[] I think I'm going to have to stick with the Nikon D40X and 18-55mm lens for starters simply because I can get the two for £350 (700$). [] Thank you once again. FYI, there is (or was) a £60 cash-back offer in the UK recently..... David |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Martin Humlark" wrote in message . .. snip I've decided on the Nikon D40X as the body. However, I'm now seriously reviewing accepting the standard 18-55mm lens. One poster, namely Floyd L. Davidson, mentioned the 18-70mm Nikkor as a better alternative to the 18-55mm. Unfortunately, this is a little outside my budget. Although, I would have liked to make this upgrade. I think I'm going to have to stick with the Nikon D40X and 18-55mm lens for starters simply because I can get the two for £350 (700$). However, I've realised that I'm going to have to invest in another lens at a later stage. Your suggestions in this regard have been particularly useful and I have made careful notes of the suggested lenses and will now do some researching to learn more about each type. Thank you once again. While I read with interest the opinions of the image quality of the better (and more expensive) alternatives to the 18-55 kit lens, it has one feature that is seldom mentioned. It is very light. As someone who has often not carried my heavier SLR outfit when backpacking due mainly to its weight, I am planning on the purchase of a D40x w/18-55 kit lens mainly due to its light weight. I feel that having the option of having a light weight option is easily worth the small price of the kit lens even if you already have several higher quality lenses. I know a P&S would be even lighter but it would also not be as versatile and also lack image quality. In your case, after you get some experience with the camera & kit lens, you will be in a better position to choose which additional lens you need. Good luck, |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Private" wrote in message news:SAKoi.137626$1i1.131888@pd7urf3no... "Martin Humlark" wrote in message . .. snip I've decided on the Nikon D40X as the body. However, I'm now seriously reviewing accepting the standard 18-55mm lens. One poster, namely Floyd L. Davidson, mentioned the 18-70mm Nikkor as a better alternative to the 18-55mm. Unfortunately, this is a little outside my budget. Although, I would have liked to make this upgrade. I think I'm going to have to stick with the Nikon D40X and 18-55mm lens for starters simply because I can get the two for £350 (700$). However, I've realised that I'm going to have to invest in another lens at a later stage. Your suggestions in this regard have been particularly useful and I have made careful notes of the suggested lenses and will now do some researching to learn more about each type. Thank you once again. While I read with interest the opinions of the image quality of the better (and more expensive) alternatives to the 18-55 kit lens, it has one feature that is seldom mentioned. It is very light. As someone who has often not carried my heavier SLR outfit when backpacking due mainly to its weight, I am planning on the purchase of a D40x w/18-55 kit lens mainly due to its light weight. I feel that having the option of having a light weight option is easily worth the small price of the kit lens even if you already have several higher quality lenses. I know a P&S would be even lighter but it would also not be as versatile and also lack image quality. In your case, after you get some experience with the camera & kit lens, you will be in a better position to choose which additional lens you need. Good luck, That's interesting and an added benifit. Thanks for mentioning that. Yes, I think I need to familiarise myself with this 18-55 lens and then work out what's best for me after I've gained some experience with it. In any case, it seems good for starters. Cheers. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"David J Taylor" wrote in message k... Martin Humlark wrote: [] I think I'm going to have to stick with the Nikon D40X and 18-55mm lens for starters simply because I can get the two for £350 (700$). [] Thank you once again. FYI, there is (or was) a £60 cash-back offer in the UK recently..... David Thanks David. Yes, I think they are offering this cashback upto the end of August so an added incentive! Cheers. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Doug Jewell" wrote in message ... "David J Taylor" wrote in message ... Doug Jewell wrote: "Jürgen Exner" wrote in message [] While the 18-55 is not a bad lens (there are much worse), it is not a lens to give you pictures in "breathtaking clarity" either. Compared to a typical P&S camera it will. You seem very critical of the "typical P&S". Some of the better small-sensor models can take just as good pictures as the entry-level DSLRs, although they have different versatilities. even the very best of the P&S's can't blow wind up a DSLR for overall image quality. In some circumstances a P&S shot may be practically indistinguishable from a DSLR (eg bright, even lighting), but overall the DSLR will win handsdown. In my own testing, the Pentax K100D (About as low on the DSLR scale as you can get) stood head and shoulders above the Canon A640 (one of the best compact cameras) when using the two side-by-side. There were a small handful of shots where you could barely tell the difference (mainly sunlit landscapes), but whenever the lighting was less than sunlit/flash, or the shot demanded the finest detail, the 6MP SLR was clearly superior to the 10MP compact. Even down to things like being able to focus on the eyes with the SLR, vs having focus somewhere inside the green rectangle and not really being able to tell for sure what it focussed on until the image was viewed on the computer afterwards. David In general I would agree that the range of versatility requested by the OP from a single lens camera setup falls best within the domain of the good P&S. It's when one starts tossing in words like amazing and breathtaking that I have to go the other direction, given the obvious. I have never seen anything I consider amazing or breathtaking from a P&S camera when compared to the same shot taken with quality glass in the appropriate lens and a pro dslr. Perfectly functional and more then adequate? yes. Amazing and breathtaking? Not by any comparison I've made. YMMV. joe .. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
JoeT wrote:
[] In general I would agree that the range of versatility requested by the OP from a single lens camera setup falls best within the domain of the good P&S. It's when one starts tossing in words like amazing and breathtaking that I have to go the other direction, given the obvious. I have never seen anything I consider amazing or breathtaking from a P&S camera when compared to the same shot taken with quality glass in the appropriate lens and a pro dslr. Perfectly functional and more then adequate? yes. Amazing and breathtaking? Not by any comparison I've made. YMMV. joe A "pro dslr" and lens to match, of course, has an amazing and breathtaking price by comparison! G David |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Chris Malcolm wrote:
Here's a photograph of part of a page of the Compact Oxford English Dictionary taken with a Sony DSC-R1 plus its accessory close up lens. This is the dictionary with all 24 (?) volumes of the full size OED photoreduced into one very large volume with print so small that very few people can read it without a magnifying glass. My wife can - I have to use the magnifier. Hell, that's one of these in Edinburgh and one in Kelso. I would that a frequency of one per 50 miles is good going for a volume like this. Had ours for maybe 10 years, more, not sure. David |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Martin Humlark schreef:
Hi Guys, I would appreciate your thoughts on the following. I'm planning to buy a digital SLR. I have established this is the type of camera I need for performance, usability and quality reasons. However, I'm unsure about which model to go for. I'm after a camera which can take extremely high resolution pictures of breathtaking clarity. Budget: approx. £400 ($800) -- which seems will buy me about 10mp Make: I would like a Nikon; have heard Canon can be just as good. Model: D40X seems appealing; not familiar with Canon models (it seems the Canon 400d would be its equal). I know many are against the Nikon D40X because autofocus is not built into the body but into the lens. I don't have lenses and I don't intend to buy another for my camera so I don't think this is an issue. I think the package "Nikon D40X + 18-55mm lens" would be all I need. By the way, I need a camera that can take close up (and focused) shots of documents, as well as a camera that can capture amazing landscapes and also work well with group shots etc. I can't seem to find any documentation anywhere telling me if the Nikon D40X would be right for close up shots of documents. As you can see, I'm pretty set on the Nikon D40X but there is so much information on the internet both positive and negative about the camera that I'm really not sure anymore. Any clarification or personal experiences would be gratefully received. Cheers! My advice : take the 18-70 mm. It is worth it ! It's one hell of a lens. You never have to look for another one in this reach. The 18-55 is very good for a kit-lens though but the 18-70 is so much better. Some time later you can look for a real tele. The new Nikkor 70-300 VR for instance is awesome http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showp...hp?product=992 -=Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DSLR advice please | Cameras | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | March 29th 07 03:36 PM |
looking for a low end dSLR - advice? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 10 | March 25th 07 01:14 PM |
Need advice on Pentax DSLR | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | December 17th 06 04:45 AM |
DSLR advice? | Chris Stolpe | Digital SLR Cameras | 21 | June 8th 05 01:17 AM |
Advice please: DSLR or DSLR-style? | JB | Digital Photography | 18 | October 21st 04 11:07 AM |