If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:31:02 GMT, Martin Humlark wrote:
I'm after a camera which can take extremely high resolution pictures of breathtaking clarity. Budget: approx. £400 ($800) -- which seems will buy me about 10mp Make: I would like a Nikon; have heard Canon can be just as good. Model: D40X seems appealing; not familiar with Canon models (it seems the Canon 400d would be its equal). I know many are against the Nikon D40X because autofocus is not built into the body but into the lens. I don't have lenses and I don't intend to buy another for my camera so I don't think this is an issue. I think the package "Nikon D40X + 18-55mm lens" would be all I need. By the way, I need a camera that can take close up (and focused) shots of documents, as well as a camera that can capture amazing landscapes and also work well with group shots etc. I can't seem to find any documentation anywhere telling me if the Nikon D40X would be right for close up shots of documents. Wow, I'm amazed at some the misinformation and poor advice you've gotten in response to your questions. It should be equally obvious that a $20,000 camera would produce more breathtaking clarity than an $800 DSLR and that that breathtaking clarity would be just as impossible to get as the impossibly priced cameras. Spending double or triple the price for a higher end DSLR won't significantly improve the pictures, but a more expensive lens would. But you can still create "breathtaking" landscapes with the inexpensive 18-55mm lens if you get a good tripod/head and create multi-image mosaics. For taking good, sharp closeups of documents a moderately expensive macro lens would be best, but don't count out the 18-55mm lens. I've copied documents using 4mp and 8mp P&S cameras, and the resolution far exceeded what I needed. How sharp do you need the document photos to be? The 8mp P&S produced fantastic legibility, and when enlarged, imperfections in individual typewritten characters were easily seen, and would be good enough to distinguish documents produced by one typewriter vs. those produced by another. Handwritten corrections were also more legible, far easier to read on the computer screen than by reading the actual document. What is really important for good photocopies is good, glare free lighting and a tripod or copy stand, whether the camera is $800 or $8000. I think that the results produced by the D40x and the 18-55mm lens will be all you need, but if I'm mistaken, it wouldn't really be improved very much by spending thousands of dollars more on a better body, but by spending much less on a better lens. As the 18-55mm kit lens is so inexpensive, it's the best starting point for you, since it will very likely satisfy your needs. If you think you really need a more expensive lens, there are ways to prevent expensive mistakes. One depends on being near a good store such as B&H, where you can test the lens on your own camera in the store, and evaluate the shots at home. Another would be to rent an expensive lens for a day and give it a good workout. But there's no need to go this route if the 18-55mm lens gives you what you want. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"the_niner_nation" wrote in message
.. . the whole idea of a DSLR is to interchange lenses according to the type of photo you want to shoot and capture....perhaps a basic point and shoot might better serve your needs? A lot of DSLR users only use one lens, myself included, and don't have the need to be constantly swapping lenses. There are a lot more reasons for using a DSLR than the ability to swap lenses. cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Jürgen Exner" wrote in message news:6Ktoi.3107$Gs4.186@trndny05... Martin Humlark wrote: I would appreciate your thoughts on the following. I'm planning to buy a digital SLR. [...] I'm after a camera which can take extremely high resolution pictures of breathtaking clarity. Budget: approx. £400 ($800) -- which seems will buy me about 10mp Make: I would like a Nikon; have heard Canon can be just as good. Model: D40X seems appealing; not familiar with Canon models (it seems the Canon 400d would be its equal). D40[x] is a bottom-end dSLR. It will not give you "extremely high resolution pictures". depends on the definition of "extremely high resolution". For someone used to shooting 8x10 sheet film, the D40x will give extremely low resolution. For someone used to shooting with a 5MP P&S, then it will give extremely high resolution. I know many are against the Nikon D40X because autofocus is not built into the body but into the lens. I don't have lenses and I don't intend to buy another for my camera so I don't think this is an issue. I think the package "Nikon D40X + 18-55mm lens" would be all I need. While the 18-55 is not a bad lens (there are much worse), it is not a lens to give you pictures in "breathtaking clarity" either. Compared to a typical P&S camera it will. By the way, I need a camera that can take close up (and focused) shots of documents, That has nothing to do with the camera but with the lens. as well as a camera that can capture amazing landscapes and also work well with group shots etc. This has very little to do with the camera but mostly with the photographer (composition!) and the lens. I can't seem to find any documentation anywhere telling me if the Nikon D40X would be right for close up shots of documents. You should target your search for this question on the lens, not the camera. Yes the lens is critical here. For a typical A4 document, the kit lens will get close enough to capture the entire document in readable quality. As you can see, I'm pretty set on the Nikon D40X but there is so much information on the internet both positive and negative about the camera that I'm really not sure anymore. The D40x is not a bad camera at all and you certainly get your money's worth. But neither the camera nor the kit lens is the right tool for "extremely high resolution pictures Once again it is relatively speaking, if he's come from a background of a p&s digi, then it will indeed deliver what he is expecting. The kit lens ain't no "L" series, but for someone who has never had an SLR before, it will be better than anything he's ever used in the past. of breathtaking clarity". If you want those, then you need to look at digital backs for medium format cameras like Hasselblad or Mayima. Of course those don't go for 800$ but start at 20000$+. And for the money, the D40x is as good or better than anything else of similar price. jue |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Adrian Boliston" wrote in message ... "the_niner_nation" wrote in message .. . the whole idea of a DSLR is to interchange lenses according to the type of photo you want to shoot and capture....perhaps a basic point and shoot might better serve your needs? A lot of DSLR users only use one lens, myself included, and don't have the need to be constantly swapping lenses. There are a lot more reasons for using a DSLR than the ability to swap lenses. cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk yeah but this guy is thinking of leaving his * kit lens* on all the time... -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Adrian Boliston" wrote in message ... "the_niner_nation" wrote in message .. . the whole idea of a DSLR is to interchange lenses according to the type of photo you want to shoot and capture....perhaps a basic point and shoot might better serve your needs? A lot of DSLR users only use one lens, myself included, and don't have the need to be constantly swapping lenses. There are a lot more reasons for using a DSLR than the ability to swap lenses. cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk While a dslr with only one lens may well suit the needs of some, the OP's stated needs of "close up (and focused) shots of documents, as well as a camera that can capture amazing landscapes and also work well with group shots etc." at the same time providing "breathtaking clarity" in all these instances, using only one lens are simply unrealistic expectations. These are the reasons why dslr is such an attractive option. If you expect amazing, breathtaking, versatility, you must first reconcile yourself to using the proper equipment! joe |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Doug Jewell wrote:
"Jürgen Exner" wrote in message [] While the 18-55 is not a bad lens (there are much worse), it is not a lens to give you pictures in "breathtaking clarity" either. Compared to a typical P&S camera it will. You seem very critical of the "typical P&S". Some of the better small-sensor models can take just as good pictures as the entry-level DSLRs, although they have different versatilities. David |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"David J Taylor" wrote in message ... Doug Jewell wrote: "Jürgen Exner" wrote in message [] While the 18-55 is not a bad lens (there are much worse), it is not a lens to give you pictures in "breathtaking clarity" either. Compared to a typical P&S camera it will. You seem very critical of the "typical P&S". Some of the better small-sensor models can take just as good pictures as the entry-level DSLRs, although they have different versatilities. even the very best of the P&S's can't blow wind up a DSLR for overall image quality. In some circumstances a P&S shot may be practically indistinguishable from a DSLR (eg bright, even lighting), but overall the DSLR will win handsdown. In my own testing, the Pentax K100D (About as low on the DSLR scale as you can get) stood head and shoulders above the Canon A640 (one of the best compact cameras) when using the two side-by-side. There were a small handful of shots where you could barely tell the difference (mainly sunlit landscapes), but whenever the lighting was less than sunlit/flash, or the shot demanded the finest detail, the 6MP SLR was clearly superior to the 10MP compact. Even down to things like being able to focus on the eyes with the SLR, vs having focus somewhere inside the green rectangle and not really being able to tell for sure what it focussed on until the image was viewed on the computer afterwards. David |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
Matt Clara wrote:
You're slow if you're making document copies hand held... The places I make document copies would throw you out if they spotted a 'professional' camera, let alone a tripod - and many forbid flash. I don't mean security issues, I just mean places like fleamarkets and antique fairs, museums or galleries (which allow photography - I don't take pictures in those which don't). Airports, train and bus stations etc. Anyway, to answer you more fully, I thought that for our Sony Alpha users I would write up the topic more fully, with examples - http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/07/22...ibit-shooting/ David |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
JoeT wrote:
"Adrian Boliston" wrote in message ... "the_niner_nation" wrote in message .. . the whole idea of a DSLR is to interchange lenses according to the type of photo you want to shoot and capture....perhaps a basic point and shoot might better serve your needs? A lot of DSLR users only use one lens, myself included, and don't have the need to be constantly swapping lenses. There are a lot more reasons for using a DSLR than the ability to swap lenses. cheers adrian www.boliston.co.uk While a dslr with only one lens may well suit the needs of some, the OP's stated needs of "close up (and focused) shots of documents, as well as a camera that can capture amazing landscapes and also work well with group shots etc." at the same time providing "breathtaking clarity" in all these instances, using only one lens are simply unrealistic expectations. These are the reasons why dslr is such an attractive option. If you expect amazing, breathtaking, versatility, you must first reconcile yourself to using the proper equipment! Here's a photograph of part of a page of the Compact Oxford English Dictionary taken with a Sony DSC-R1 plus its accessory close up lens. This is the dictionary with all 24 (?) volumes of the full size OED photoreduced into one very large volume with print so small that very few people can read it without a magnifying glass. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/197/4...d6bad109_o.jpg There's a couple of images taken without the close up lens, just the native zoom, here. They could be improved by editing for exposure contrast and sharpness, but I've deliberately left them as plain unaltered jpegs straight out of the camera. http://www.flickr.com/photos/chris_m...7600201737025/ What DSLR would do better than these? BTW, it's quite good at breathtaking landscapes too :-) -- Chris Malcolm DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
First DSLR -- Need advice
"Doug Jewell" writes:
depends on the definition of "extremely high resolution". For someone used to shooting 8x10 sheet film, the D40x will give extremely low resolution. For someone used to shooting with a 5MP P&S, then it will give extremely high resolution. That is a common misconception. Doubling the number of pixels does not work wonders for the resolution in either direction. A 5 MP camera with an aspect ratio of 4:3 has something like 2582 x 1936 pixels; the Nikon D40x has 3872 x 2592. That is a factor of 1.5 horizontally and 1.3 vertically, hardly "extreme". -- There is hardly anything in the world that someone cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price alone are that person's lawful prey. -- John Ruskin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DSLR advice please | Cameras | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | March 29th 07 03:36 PM |
looking for a low end dSLR - advice? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 10 | March 25th 07 01:14 PM |
Need advice on Pentax DSLR | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | December 17th 06 04:45 AM |
DSLR advice? | Chris Stolpe | Digital SLR Cameras | 21 | June 8th 05 01:17 AM |
Advice please: DSLR or DSLR-style? | JB | Digital Photography | 18 | October 21st 04 11:07 AM |