If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation
On Jan 26, 6:46 am, "Paul D. Sullivan" wrote: I was following the discussion and started doing some searching. I found this app called Better JPEG that says it does some key operations in a method that absolutley minimizes recompression. http://www.betterjpeg.com/ Has anyone heard about this? It seems a smart way to do things, but I'm not sure if it is BS or if it is real. If you have any experience on this app, please share some feedback if you would. Thanks I checked out the free trial for a few months (on multiple computers) and finally purchased it last month. Anyone interested in making changes while keeping jpg compression to the bare minimum will appreciate what Better Jpeg does (it's able to re-save jpeg files but only change a few select 8x16 blocks, leaving the other 95% of the picture's pixels unchanged, and not recompressing the entire picture). It's a good compact program and I hope they keep developing it. I've used Jpegcrop for years; this program builds on it and adds functionality and versatility. I haven't tried the redeye feature yet - mainly I want to quickly be able to: - Crop to fixed aspect, such as 4x6, before taking the pictures in for printing. - And rather than crop at just any old location (i.e. in the middle of an 8x16 block, jumbling and shuffling the pixels over and creating jpg artifacts such as the halo effect, among other things), it can 'snap- to' the nearest 8x16 block boundary for the new top left corner start point. - Add text/watermark with various effects, again with only a small block of pixels getting recompressed rather than the entire file. - Extend a photo from a 4x3 aspect camera so it fits a 3/2 or 4x6 aspect, by adding a blank white area on one side. This allows it to be printed out properly at 4x6 inches without cutting off anything (i.e. so the photo developing service won't automatically cut a strip off the top and bottom to force the 3x4 aspect image to fit across a 4x6 print). It can be automated for doing multiple photos, in batch process. - If you only need to fix a small area of the photo (carpet stain, a single pimple, etc), you can select that area (draw a box around it) in Better Jpeg, Copy the selection, Paste it into Photoshop, fix it, then Paste it back into the picture with Better Jpeg. (Because this feature works so well, I went with the stand-alone version rather than the Photoshop plug-in when deciding which version to purchase.) - Another useful enhancement on the basic Jpegcrop is the Explorer- like 2 pane window, this lets you move through directories easily rather than having to open and close each file individually. You can advance through the folder contents by clicking on the thumbnails in the left pane. FWIW my routine for nearly a decade is to use Irfanview as a viewer to quickly scroll through directories, and for crude editing (resize to half size, lighten dark pictures), and for batch renaming and resizing. I use Jpegcrop for lossless rotation and cropping, and have it in my Irfanview's menu item 'Open with external editor'. Even after purchasing Better Jpeg, I still use Guido's Jpegcrop for dealing with single images, or whenever going thru the photos with Irfanview. I have Photoshop for retouching, but don't use it for simple cropping and viewing; the other programs are so much smaller and less 'resource hoggish' and probably do a better job anyway. I stumbled onto Better Jpeg last year while checking out Jpegcrops, a separate good free program that also builds on the basic Jpegcrop jpegtran algorithm. If you're not inclined to fork over $25 for Better Jpeg, then this is the next best thing. http://ekot.dk/ programmer/JPEGCrops There's another free program designed to insert text, and change only specific 8x16 blocks without recompressing the entire jpeg. (Jdatestamp) I haven't tried it. http://jdatestamp.sourceforge.net The venerable Exifer can add text/annotation, but it's not 'lossless' AFAIK. I use Exifer when I want to add a name or keywords to the Exif and IPTC data, or to fix time/date errors. On my camera I've been using a wide prime lens (non-zooming), so many/ most of my pictures can use some cropping! Sorry about any mangled terminology, just wanted to report good experience with the program. HTH dh www.pbase.com/dh |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation
Great info! Thanks much.
I checked out the free trial for a few months (on multiple computers) and finally purchased it last month. Anyone interested in making changes while keeping jpg compression to the bare minimum will appreciate what Better Jpeg does (it's able to re-save jpeg files but only change a few select 8x16 blocks, leaving the other 95% of the picture's pixels unchanged, and not recompressing the entire picture). It's a good compact program and I hope they keep developing it. I've used Jpegcrop for years; this program builds on it and adds functionality and versatility. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation
On 27 Jan., 18:04, " wrote: The venerable Exifer can add text/annotation, but it's not 'lossless' AFAIK. I use Exifer when I want to add a name or keywords to the Exif andIPTCdata, or to fix time/date errors. If you speak about EXIF and IPTC data, then I'm quite sure that Exifer is lossless. A JPEG consists of different sections, one for the image data, one for EXIF, one for IPTC, .... There is absolutely no need to alter the image data section in any way if the EXIF or IPTC section are changed. In fact it is even easier to implement and faster in execution, so I doubt that any meta data tool will recompress the image data in that case. And I'm completely sure that Mapivi, ExifTool and Image::MetaData::JPEG don't change the image data when editing EXIF and IPTC. In my opinion the whole JPEG quality discussion is a little bit overrated. Of course, everybody should be aware that a recompression can reduce the quality of a JPEG, but if you consider some simple rules nobody will ever notice. I guess that a lot of pictures are never printed at all and about 90% of all prints are in the size of 4x6 inch. So, even if you save a JPEG two or three times with a high quality setting there is no real visible difference to the original. Here are some rules of thumb: - Do as much as possible in a lossless way (rotating, cropping, adding meta data, e.g. with Mapivi) - Keep the quality level (NOT compression level!) at 95%. This gives a reasonable file size, and according to the JPEG developers a higher level would just add to the file size not to the quality! - Keep the number of recompressions as small as possible - Do not overwrite the original file (you may need it later) For special tasks and big prints other strategies (RAW, 16bit, TIFF, PNG, XCF, ...) may be worth considering, but I guess for most people and tasks staying with JPEG and applying the above rules is a very good choice. I edit some of my pictures in GIMP and add a frame to some of these pictures later (using Mapivi). So at a maximum I recompress a JPEG two times with quality level 95%. I made prints up to 16x24 inch and I'm happy with the quality, but of course everybody has different demands. Everybody who is uncertain about JPEG quality should try this (it takes only five minutes): 1) Take a JPEG picture from the camera, open it in GIMP or Photoshop and save it with 95% under a new file name 2) Repeat the last step 3) Compare the original with the new version (as two prints or on the monitor; maybe in 100% zoom) 4) Decide if you can see a difference, and if you can tolerate it Just my 2 cents. Regards Martin |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation
On Jan 29, 1:12 pm, wrote: On 27 Jan., 18:04, " wrote: The venerable Exifer can add text/annotation, but it's not 'lossless' AFAIK. I use Exifer when I want to add a name or keywords to the Exif andIPTCdata, or to fix time/date errors. If you speak about EXIF and IPTC data, then I'm quite sure that Exifer is lossless. A JPEG consists of different sections, one for the image data, one for EXIF, one for IPTC, (clip) Agreed, Exifer modifies EXIF and IPTC data in a lossless manner. For the record, I was focussing on operations that change the image itself, in this case by stamping text, date or other annotation onto part of the picture. Sorry I wasn't so clear. E.g., the sentence immediately preceding this one in my original full post - I was saying "There's another free program designed to insert text, and change only specific 8x16 blocks without recompressing the entire jpeg..." You make good points (and I should take a look at the Mapivi software you mentioned later) but in my own defense, I certainly didn't "diss" Exifer! Under "Image -- Insert Watermark", Exifer can do this, but it isn't lossless - when you Save it, the whole photo is changed (not just the affected blocks, as with Better Jpeg and Jdatestamp). As to whether the cumulative jpeg degradation hurts the image, I dunno. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation
On 30 Jan., 02:07, " wrote: the record, I was focussing on operations that change the image itself, in this case by stamping text, date or other annotation onto part of the picture. Sorry I wasn't so clear. No problem! E.g., the sentence immediately preceding this one in my original full post - I was saying "There's another free program designed to insert text, and change only specific 8x16 blocks without recompressing the entire jpeg..." You make good points (and I should take a look at the Mapivi software you mentioned later) but in my own defense, I certainly didn't "diss" Exifer! I know, this wasn't my impression either, I wrote my post just to clarify for other readers that the "main" functionality of Exifer is lossless. Under "Image -- Insert Watermark", Exifer can do this, but Sorry, I didn't know about this function. it isn't lossless - when you Save it, the whole photo is changed (not just the affected blocks, as with Better Jpeg and Jdatestamp). You are absolutely right! BTW, there is also a free command line tool for lossless JPEG drop available (jpegtran with drop patch), see "Lossless crop 'n' drop (cut & paste)" on this page: http://sylvana.net/jpegcrop/jpegtran/ With that tool it is possible to add a lossless frame or watermark to a picture. Example: jpegtran -drop +10+50 watermark.jpg -outfile pic-watermark.jpg pic.jpg +10 = x coordinate +50 = y coordinate watermark.jpg = small watermark picture pic.jpg = original picture pic-watermark.jpg = new picture with watermark I will integrate this feature - at least the lossless framing - in the next release of Mapivi. Regards Martin |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
jpeg and jpeg 2000 | Conrad | Digital Photography | 71 | February 3rd 07 11:04 PM |
Nikon D70 RAW converted to JPEG - jpeg file size 3MB ? 5 MB? | Amit | Digital Photography | 1 | March 16th 06 06:50 PM |
RAW vs. RAW + JPEG | Brian | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | February 19th 06 02:13 AM |
RAW vs. RAW + JPEG | Floyd Davidson | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | February 18th 06 05:08 AM |
RAW vs JPEG | Robert R Kircher, Jr. | Digital Photography | 36 | December 23rd 04 07:41 AM |