Nice macro shot of a wasp

Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645

Wow...superb....


"RichA" wrote in message
news
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645

Steve Franklin wrote:
Wow...superb....


"RichA" wrote in message
news
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645



So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate?

--
Douglas...
It's traditional, painter's use it, Rembrandt used it.
Now you can put your photos on it too!
http://www.canvasphotos.com.au

RichA wrote:

Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645

Judging by contrasty edge halos a little heavy on the sharpenning and/or
contrast in PS. The scale is very nice of course.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate?


Looks like it been noise reduced by resizing etc and then sharpened, if you
look closely at the flower there are signs of noise, but still a pretty good
picture at this size

"Ryadia@Home" wrote:

Steve Franklin wrote:
Wow...superb....


"RichA" wrote in message
news
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645



So where is all the noise these E300's are supposed to generate?


It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever
used the E300, for example Alan Browne.

It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not
sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a
source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make
"authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever
used, for example ...

.... I'm sure you can guess.

;-)

Tony Polson wrote:

It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever
used the E300, for example Alan Browne.

Used it? yes. Much? No. Liked it? Too small, dim viewfinder.

Opinion on noise : dpreview graphs. The E-1 in particular; the E300
ain't great either.

It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not
sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a

Lack of advertising might indicate another problem:

"Those *******s at dpreview are daring to tell the truth about our noisy
Olympus camera. Pull the advert dollars!!!"

It rubs that way more than the opposite...

source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make
"authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever
used, for example ...

My statements regarding noise and the 4/3 system are clearly in regard
to future higher density models with the small sensor size. But Tony
Polson is a great expert at quoting out of context, selective snipping
and plain old sniping at those who disagree with him. Or who have
caught him in one of his numerous truth bending episodes:

-Paris Match cover from the 1970's. Show it Polson.

-.E-1 with 8 Mpixel sensor (BWAAHAHA)
.Consumer version of E-1 with 5 Mpix. (Bwahahha)
.ordered an "E-2" (Bwaahahsh).

-Generalities on aperture size and sharpness

-50 rolls of film per average *week*

-Says Nat Geo Field Guide is greatest thing since sliced bread
(In "gushing" terms, pathetic really)
-Then says it sucks ... which is it Polson?

... etc. ...

Tony Polson: it is long past time for you to post proof that you have
any talent approaching your claims.

Cheers,
Alan.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

"RichA" wrote in message
news
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645

Nice shot. I guess you got lucky finding a deaf, dumb and blind bee. LOL

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:14:24 -0600, "Sheldon"
wrote:


"RichA" wrote in message
news
Looks like the prices asked for macro lenses are definitely
worth it.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13733645

Nice shot. I guess you got lucky finding a deaf, dumb and blind bee. LOL


Not my shot, but similar questions were asked of the shooter!
-Rich

Alan Browne wrote:
Tony Polson wrote:


It is an absolute certainty in the mind of people who haven't ever
used the E300, for example Alan Browne.


Used it? yes. Much? No. Liked it? Too small, dim viewfinder.

Opinion on noise : dpreview graphs. The E-1 in particular; the E300
ain't great either.

It is also to be found on digital photography web sites that are not
sponsored by Olympus, such as dpr*****.com, often quoted or used as a


Lack of advertising might indicate another problem:

"Those *******s at dpreview are daring to tell the truth about our noisy
Olympus camera. Pull the advert dollars!!!"

It rubs that way more than the opposite...

source by people who know next to nothing about photography to make
"authoritative" statements on here about equipment they haven't ever
used, for example ...


My statements regarding noise and the 4/3 system are clearly in regard
to future higher density models with the small sensor size. But Tony
Polson is a great expert at quoting out of context, selective snipping
and plain old sniping at those who disagree with him. Or who have
caught him in one of his numerous truth bending episodes:

-Paris Match cover from the 1970's. Show it Polson.

-.E-1 with 8 Mpixel sensor (BWAAHAHA)
.Consumer version of E-1 with 5 Mpix. (Bwahahha)
.ordered an "E-2" (Bwaahahsh).

-Generalities on aperture size and sharpness

-50 rolls of film per average *week*

-Says Nat Geo Field Guide is greatest thing since sliced bread
(In "gushing" terms, pathetic really)
-Then says it sucks ... which is it Polson?

... etc. ...

Tony Polson: it is long past time for you to post proof that you have
any talent approaching your claims.

Cheers,
Alan.

Ahhh, Feel better now?

--
Douglas...
It's traditional, painter's use it, Rembrandt used it.
Now you can put your photos on it too!
http://www.canvasphotos.com.au