If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
"RichA" wrote in message
... Seems like the emphasis on it is taking away from still functionality and that is probably bad, though not for the target market of this camera, I'd guess. http://dpreview.com/previews/panasonicdmcgf2/ For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
In article , Alex VI
writes For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed. Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
On 11/5/10 PDT 5:49 PM, Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In article , Alex VI writes For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. Indeed. Most cuts are easily measured in seconds. Except on amateur efforts. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) Perhaps the poster was slyly hinting that his prowess in certain X rated scenes requires that amount of uncut action..... if you know what I mean. -- john mcwilliams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:05:38 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote: On 11/5/10 PDT 5:49 PM, Kennedy McEwen wrote: In article , Alex VI writes For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. Indeed. Most cuts are easily measured in seconds. Except on amateur efforts. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) Perhaps the poster was slyly hinting that his prowess in certain X rated scenes requires that amount of uncut action..... if you know what I mean. Or that any more than that would never be used. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
"Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message
... For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) -- Kennedy I'm not a Hollywood film producer, so I guess I wouldn't know. But I have an idea what most hot blooded males would do with their cameras if they had video. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
"Alex VI" wrote in message
... "Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message ... For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) -- Kennedy I'm not a Hollywood film producer, so I guess I wouldn't know. But I have an idea what most hot blooded males would do with their cameras if they had video. In case you haven't worked it out, I'm talking about ****ing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
"Alex VI" wrote in message ... "Alex VI" wrote in message ... "Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message ... For video to be any good on still camera's, it needs to record more than 10 minutes. If you know what I mean. ;-) Can you name a single Hollywood movie with a single shot that has more than 10 minutes between cuts? I suspect you will struggle to find many that have many longer than 1 minute. If less than a minute is good enough for Hollywood, why is it wrong to force the great unwashed to limit their clips to less than 10minutes - almost 5x as long as a single reel of 8mm cine film? Is there any commercial need to watch "little Johnny" gorging his bar of chocolate and vomiting it all up 11 minutes later without a cut between the two acts? ;-) -- Kennedy I'm not a Hollywood film producer, so I guess I wouldn't know. But I have an idea what most hot blooded males would do with their cameras if they had video. In case you haven't worked it out, I'm talking about ****ing. In case you haven't worked it out, Alex is one of the many who should disconnect their keyboards before typing. IMDb commentor Phantomg6, on the movie "The Player": "The answer to your question of which film has the longest take is "Russian Ark." It is a feature length film consisting of merely 1 long-take, not a single cut in the entire film. Before this film, the record for longest cut must have been Hitchcock's "Rope", as the entire film cuts only, I believe, 6 times. Each cut is the length of an entire reel of film, which is the only reason Hitchcock cut." Another commentor, HSJDesign: "Fun Fact: The second guy who talks about TOuch of Evil's opening shot in this movie's first scene, the moment he starts talking this movie breaks the timelength of Touch of Evil." I have yet to discover the official "timelength" of the "Touch of Evil" opening scene. -- Frank ess |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
On 10-11-07 11:45 , Alex VI wrote:
In case you haven't worked it out, I'm talking about ****ing. Most people who talk about it are not only inept at it but have inadequate anatomy complemented with very short endurance. -- gmail originated posts filtered due to spam. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
Alex VI wrote:
Alex VI wrote: I have an idea what most hot blooded males would do with their cameras if they had video. In case you haven't worked it out, I'm talking about ****ing. Wow, I won't even put the tip of my rocket blower inside my camera... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is video degrading new still camera models?
On 11/7/10 5:12 PM, in article m, "Wilba" wrote: Alex VI wrote: Alex VI wrote: I have an idea what most hot blooded males would do with their cameras if they had video. In case you haven't worked it out, I'm talking about ****ing. Wow, I won't even put the tip of my rocket blower inside my camera... BFG! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New camera models | Don Stauffer | Digital Photography | 11 | November 2nd 08 04:20 PM |
(video) Guy shows off FLIR infrared thermal video camera that he bought off Ebay. | Joe[_7_] | Digital Photography | 6 | November 16th 07 02:15 PM |
Biggest worldwide free Entertainment multi language Video web , Travel, Sports, Health , Racing cars , Massages techniques, Games , Fashions, Jokes , Top models , Free online IT learning , 5000 links, 250 free online TV , 50000 music video, n | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | August 22nd 07 08:30 PM |
Video camera -vs- digital camera with video function | mike bishop | Digital Photography | 4 | June 14th 07 06:59 PM |
Select a 5 megapixel camera between 6 models ???? | Chris Berry | Digital Photography | 48 | October 20th 04 08:07 AM |