If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:24:32 +0100, David_B
wrote: On 07/06/2020 00:33, Eric Stevens wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:23:57 -0700, John McWilliams wrote: On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote: On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff wrote: On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote: On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote: Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the first on left hand side. https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv Sorry about that! ;-) Yeah I wondered where the image link was. Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ? Nice pic, niceÂ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it. geoff Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ejgecx8uk...nbury.jpg?dl=0 Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. Thanks, Eric. Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By Kaspersky? You know as much as I do. As you can see it's truncated. If you wish to explore further yourself, simply copy/paste the link into Virus Total - select 'URL', he- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/home/upload Thanks -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
"Eric Stevens" wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:24:32 +0100, David_B wrote: Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By Kaspersky? You know as much as I do. As you can see it's truncated. It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:55:44 +0100, "Apd" wrote:
"Eric Stevens" wrote: On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:24:32 +0100, David_B wrote: Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By Kaspersky? You know as much as I do. As you can see it's truncated. It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. Even so, I don't expect that David either knew or intended that it be there. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 11/06/2020 11:16, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:55:44 +0100, "Apd" wrote: "Eric Stevens" wrote: On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:24:32 +0100, David_B wrote: Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By Kaspersky? You know as much as I do. As you can see it's truncated. It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. Even so, I don't expect that David either knew or intended that it be there. Thanks, Eric. :-) I had absolutely no idea it was there. :-( I wonder if Apd knows from whence the script originated. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 11/06/2020 02:52, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky Please post a screenshot, Eric. Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken? Wasn't a problem at all. The malicious link most likely not in David's image but bundled with the compressed image downloaded with David's image. unlike most of david's links, this one was surprisingly not malicious. *FOUL* I have never knowingly posted a malicious link. *EVER* McAfee never used to find these by Kaspersky has warned me of several. just because it warned you doesn't mean it's actually a problem. it's clearly a false positive. Apd has also suggested that it's a 'false positive' MID |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 11/06/2020 00:19, geoff wrote:
On 10/06/2020 6:02 pm, David_B wrote: On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote: On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote: I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of the best in the business though:- https://www.clamxav.com Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing? Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be better-named. That's upside-down thinking for sure, geoff! :-) Not many folk here like the product either:- https://www.facebook.com/clamxav/ Less than 400 the last time I looked. It could also be audio-visual systems for the bearded-clamÂ* (!) Indeed, geoff (but I have no idea what you mean!) When will your website be finished? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
"David_B" wrote:
On 11/06/2020 11:16, Eric Stevens wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:55:44 +0100, "Apd" wrote: It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. Even so, I don't expect that David either knew or intended that it be there. Thanks, Eric. :-) I had absolutely no idea it was there. :-( No reason why you would. I wonder if Apd knows from whence the script originated. From where I said, cdn.siteswithcontent.com. CDN = content distribution network. It supplies part of the web page content, i.e. javascript for notifications, as I said elsewhere. It's common for sites to pull their scripts from such places. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was - Oops! (Was - '3D'))
In article , Apd
wrote: It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. Even so, I don't expect that David either knew or intended that it be there. Thanks, Eric. :-) I had absolutely no idea it was there. :-( No reason why you would. he claims to be an investigator hunting down the bad guys. such a person *would* know it was there. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -
On 11/06/2020 23:25, nospam wrote:
In article , Apd wrote: It was alerting on a script from cdn.siteswithcontent.com. That domain has apparently been associated with adware. The script is OK so it's a false positive. Even so, I don't expect that David either knew or intended that it be there. Thanks, Eric. :-) I had absolutely no idea it was there. :-( No reason why you would. he claims to be an investigator hunting down the bad guys. I am. such a person *would* know it was there. I'm still learning! *HOW* would I know there was a script involved? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|