Images of the abandoned

On 10/5/14 7:48 PM, in article ,
"Eric Stevens" wrote:

On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:39:53 -0500, George Kerby
wrote:




On 10/5/14 5:48 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , George Kerby
wrote:


http://news.distractify.com/beth-buczynski/nature-reclaims-what-we-abandon
/

"Page does not exist"

yes it does.

I'm sure it does, but when I click on the original URL that the OP posted,
that is the result that I get...

Try this: http://tinyurl.com/o5at38b
It's the same site but may employ different routing.

BINGO! Thanks!

On 10/5/14 7:58 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , George Kerby
wrote:


http://news.distractify.com/beth-buczynski/nature-reclaims-what-we-abandon
/

"Page does not exist"

yes it does.

I'm sure it does, but when I click on the original URL that the OP posted,
that is the result that I get...

something is wrong at your end.

Don't think so, the followup by Eric was fine...

In article ,
George Kerby wrote:

On 10/5/14 7:58 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , George Kerby
wrote:


http://news.distractify.com/beth-buczynski/nature-reclaims-what-we-abandon

/

"Page does not exist"

yes it does.

I'm sure it does, but when I click on the original URL that the OP posted,
that is the result that I get...

something is wrong at your end.

Don't think so, the followup by Eric was fine...

The original link worked for me.
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

BTW: Concerning Chernobyl:

http://englishrussia.com/2006/09/13/lost-city-of-chernobyl/


On 10/5/14 9:58 PM, in article ,
"George Kerby" wrote:




On 10/5/14 7:48 PM, in article ,
"Eric Stevens" wrote:

On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:39:53 -0500, George Kerby
wrote:




On 10/5/14 5:48 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , George Kerby
wrote:



http://news.distractify.com/beth-buczynski/nature-reclaims-what-we-abandon

/

"Page does not exist"

yes it does.

I'm sure it does, but when I click on the original URL that the OP posted,
that is the result that I get...

Try this: http://tinyurl.com/o5at38b
It's the same site but may employ different routing.

BINGO! Thanks!

In article , George Kerby
wrote:

http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/

"Page does not exist"

yes it does.

I'm sure it does, but when I click on the original URL that the OP posted,
that is the result that I get...

something is wrong at your end.

Don't think so, the followup by Eric was fine...

the above link works. it's something at your end.

On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:08:56 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2014-10-06 00:50:06 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:54:23 -0500, philo* wrote:

On 10/05/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/




Yep.

If all humans disappeared today, in 100 years there would not be
much sign of them left.

Oh I dunno. They are still arguing about +14,000 year-old remains in
South America, over in sci.archaeology.

...but what will the surviving cockroaches argue over?

Accessible toe nails?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On 10/05/2014 07:50 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:54:23 -0500, philo wrote:

On 10/05/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/




Yep.

If all humans disappeared today, in 100 years there would not be
much sign of them left.

Oh I dunno. They are still arguing about +14,000 year-old remains in
South America, over in sci.archaeology.



But most of the stuff will be pretty well buried.

In my own yard I must pull out dozens of tree seedlings every year...
If I didn't, my whole yard would be a forest in 100 years

On 10/6/2014 5:05 AM, philo wrote:
On 10/05/2014 07:50 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:54:23 -0500, philo wrote:

On 10/05/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/





Yep.

If all humans disappeared today, in 100 years there would not be
much sign of them left.

Oh I dunno. They are still arguing about +14,000 year-old remains in
South America, over in sci.archaeology.



But most of the stuff will be pretty well buried.

In my own yard I must pull out dozens of tree seedlings every year...
If I didn't, my whole yard would be a forest in 100 years

Will yo know it.

--
PeterN

On 10/5/14 PDT, 6:01 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 10/5/2014 7:54 PM, philo wrote:
On 10/05/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/

Yep.

If all humans disappeared today, in 100 years there would not be
much sign of them left.

There was an interesting show on one of the channels, on that very
theme, called "Life After People."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1433058/

Darn. Missed it a couple of years ago.

I suppose even much of the plastic strewn about will be overgrown, and
in arrid places, start to breakdown in the heat and UV exposure.

In article , philo* wrote:

Eric Stevens:
http://news.distractify.com/beth-buc...at-we-abandon/

Yep.

If all humans disappeared today, in 100 years there would not be
much sign of them left.

You know, there's still some thousands of years old remnants of humans
around...

Sure, your local McDonald's isn't as sturdy built as the pyramids, but
still


--
Sandman[.net]