If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
"Yoshi" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Donald Specker" wrote in message news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07... Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Thanks. This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. It was......but has adapted to the real world where 35mm film today is almost non existing! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
"Donald Specker" skrev i en meddelelse news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07... Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Thanks. To me it makes perfect sense as long as you can get the "angle of view" you need (wide angle). Max |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
On Sep 24, 11:34 am, "Donald Specker"
wrote: Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Of course it does. In that scenario, I'd consider the 5D as the backup. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
On Sep 24, 11:45 am, "Yoshi" wrote:
"Donald Specker" wrote in message This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized sensors. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
Annika1980 wrote:
No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized sensors. pedant Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic... /pedant ;-) -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
On Sep 24, 1:57 pm, Peter Chant
wrote: Annika1980 wrote: No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized sensors. pedant Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic... /pedant I knew that was coming as soon as I posted it. But since the 40D is part of Canon's 35mm-based DSLR system and uses the same lenses as my 35mm Fabulous EOS-1V, I guess I'll keep posting here. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
Yoshi wrote:
This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. No. It's for 35mm format camera equipment from which most DSLR cameras are derived. IAC if the NG were limited to film only users it would get quite quiet in here very fast. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
"Max Perl" wrote in message k... "Yoshi" skrev i en meddelelse ... "Donald Specker" wrote in message news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07... Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D. Thanks. This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography. It was......but has adapted to the real world where 35mm film today is almost non existing! In general, to devote a whole newsgroup to one particular type of photographic sensing plane is pretty restrictive.....Basically, there is little difference between 35 mm cameras and small hand held digital cameras....They both produce the same results, and require the same auxiliary equipment (lenses, tripods, carry bags, and etc.) in order to get those results. What does it matter whether a photograph I see on my computer was taken with film and then digitized by a film scanner, or whether it was digitized directly inside the camera? In either case, I can't see it on my computer unless it is digitized by something, somewhere along the way. And, should I not want digitized photos, then I would be restricted to living at my local camera store, which is about what my father had to do. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
1.6x body a complement to FF?
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:57:20 +0100, Peter Chant
wrote: Annika1980 wrote: No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized sensors. pedant Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic... /pedant The Tessina 35 uses 35mm film with a frame size of 14mm x 21mm, not far off the 40D's 15mm x 22mm. -- Matthew Winn [If replying by mail remove the "r" from "urk"] |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D80 - Buy Body Only or Body with Kit Lens? | Bill Gillespie | Digital SLR Cameras | 38 | December 8th 06 07:25 PM |
FA: Beginners, students and those who need a 2nd camera body need this Canon AE-1 body! | Hugh Lyon-Sach | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | August 12th 05 09:26 PM |
FS : DCS 460 - N 90 body only | P | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 3rd 05 01:24 AM |
FS: X-370 body | Joe | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | February 27th 04 07:12 PM |
FS: Nikkormat FT (Body Only) | [email protected] | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | January 7th 04 11:03 PM |