A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1.6x body a complement to FF?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th 07, 04:34 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Donald Specker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 33
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto
lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.


  #2  
Old September 24th 07, 05:18 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Max Perl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 281
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?


"Yoshi" skrev i en meddelelse
...

"Donald Specker" wrote in message
news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07...
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with
telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.

This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography.

It was......but has adapted to the real world where 35mm film today is
almost non existing!




  #3  
Old September 24th 07, 05:20 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Max Perl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 281
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?


"Donald Specker" skrev i en meddelelse
news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07...
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with
telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.


To me it makes perfect sense as long as you can get the "angle of view" you
need (wide angle).

Max


  #4  
Old September 24th 07, 05:30 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Annika1980
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,898
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

On Sep 24, 11:34 am, "Donald Specker"
wrote:
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to a
FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with telephoto
lenses, costs less than another 5D.


Of course it does. In that scenario, I'd consider the 5D as the
backup.


  #5  
Old September 24th 07, 05:31 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Annika1980
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,898
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

On Sep 24, 11:45 am, "Yoshi" wrote:
"Donald Specker" wrote in message

This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography.


No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized
sensors.

  #6  
Old September 24th 07, 06:57 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter Chant[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 203
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

Annika1980 wrote:


No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized
sensors.


pedant
Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic...
/pedant

;-)

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
  #7  
Old September 24th 07, 08:59 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Annika1980
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,898
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

On Sep 24, 1:57 pm, Peter Chant
wrote:
Annika1980 wrote:
No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized
sensors.


pedant
Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic...
/pedant


I knew that was coming as soon as I posted it.
But since the 40D is part of Canon's 35mm-based DSLR system and uses
the same lenses as my 35mm Fabulous EOS-1V, I guess I'll keep posting
here.


  #8  
Old September 25th 07, 01:11 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

Yoshi wrote:

This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography.


No. It's for 35mm format camera equipment from which most DSLR cameras
are derived.

IAC if the NG were limited to film only users it would get quite quiet
in here very fast.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
  #9  
Old September 25th 07, 01:41 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,361
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?


"Max Perl" wrote in message
k...

"Yoshi" skrev i en meddelelse
...

"Donald Specker" wrote in message
news:xOQJi.2062$YN2.1569@trndny07...
Does it make sense to use a camera like a 40D as a backup/complement to
a FF, like the 5D? Seems that the 40D would offer extra reach with
telephoto lenses, costs less than another 5D.

Thanks.

This newsgroup is for 35mm film photography.

It was......but has adapted to the real world where 35mm film today is
almost non existing!

In general, to devote a whole newsgroup to one particular type of
photographic sensing plane is pretty restrictive.....Basically, there is
little difference between 35 mm cameras and small hand held digital
cameras....They both produce the same results, and require the same
auxiliary equipment (lenses, tripods, carry bags, and etc.) in order to get
those results. What does it matter whether a photograph I see on my computer
was taken with film and then digitized by a film scanner, or whether it was
digitized directly inside the camera? In either case, I can't see it on my
computer unless it is digitized by something, somewhere along the way. And,
should I not want digitized photos, then I would be restricted to living at
my local camera store, which is about what my father had to do.


  #10  
Old September 25th 07, 09:27 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Matthew Winn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default 1.6x body a complement to FF?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:57:20 +0100, Peter Chant
wrote:

Annika1980 wrote:

No mention of "film' in the group name. We are discussing 35mm sized
sensors.


pedant
Therefore the 40D, being a non-full frame sensor is off topic...
/pedant


The Tessina 35 uses 35mm film with a frame size of 14mm x 21mm, not
far off the 40D's 15mm x 22mm.

--
Matthew Winn
[If replying by mail remove the "r" from "urk"]
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon D80 - Buy Body Only or Body with Kit Lens? Bill Gillespie Digital SLR Cameras 38 December 8th 06 07:25 PM
FA: Beginners, students and those who need a 2nd camera body need this Canon AE-1 body! Hugh Lyon-Sach 35mm Equipment for Sale 1 August 12th 05 09:26 PM
FS : DCS 460 - N 90 body only P Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 0 August 3rd 05 01:24 AM
FS: X-370 body Joe 35mm Equipment for Sale 1 February 27th 04 07:12 PM
FS: Nikkormat FT (Body Only) [email protected] 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 January 7th 04 11:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.