A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Giving photogs a bad name?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 19th 14, 12:53 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bowser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 265
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

On Sat, 17 May 2014 23:00:22 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...lican-primary/


the blogger was a tea party supporter. 'nuff said.
  #2  
Old May 19th 14, 02:48 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PAS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 480
Default Giving photogs a bad name?


"Bowser" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 May 2014 23:00:22 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...lican-primary/


the blogger was a tea party supporter. 'nuff said.


So am I. Don't got the way of a bigot and paint everyone with a broad
brush. What the blogger did is reprehensible but it is not a reflection on
the group, just himself.


  #3  
Old May 19th 14, 03:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
George Kerby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default Giving photogs a bad name?




On 5/19/14 8:48 AM, in article , "PAS"
wrote:


"Bowser" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 May 2014 23:00:22 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...t-shakes-up-mi
ssissippi-republican-primary/


the blogger was a tea party supporter. 'nuff said.


So am I. Don't got the way of a bigot and paint everyone with a broad
brush. What the blogger did is reprehensible but it is not a reflection on
the group, just himself.



"bowser" is a lapdog for dimwit libtards. He LOVES Uncle SugarDaddy running
his life, so that response was as expected...

  #4  
Old May 20th 14, 12:50 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,246
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

On 5/19/2014 10:44 AM, George Kerby wrote:


snip


"bowser" is a lapdog for dimwit libtards. He LOVES Uncle SugarDaddy running
his life, so that response was as expected...


I would be nice to have the freedom to rob banks'
Should we abolish speed limits on all highways.
We could save a lot of money if we didn't maintain those pesky red lights.
I guess it should be illegal to dump mercury into drinking water.

//end sarcasm tag

--
PeterN
  #5  
Old May 20th 14, 01:56 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Should we abolish speed limits on all highways.


that's how it used to be in montana, without mass carnage on the
highways.
  #7  
Old May 21st 14, 10:29 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
George Kerby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,798
Default Giving photogs a bad name?




On 5/19/14 7:56 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Should we abolish speed limits on all highways.


that's how it used to be in montana, without mass carnage on the
highways.


Heard it was the same on some German Autobahns...

  #8  
Old May 21st 14, 10:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
James Silverton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 123
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

On 5/21/2014 5:29 PM, George Kerby wrote:



On 5/19/14 7:56 PM, in article ,
"nospam" wrote:

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Should we abolish speed limits on all highways.


that's how it used to be in montana, without mass carnage on the
highways.


Heard it was the same on some German Autobahns...


Unlimited speed was the rule on German Autobahnen but the stretches with
that seem to decrease annually. I used to like the signs saying "Please,
no faster than 100" (in German of course it was "Bitte, nicht schneller
als 100" wasn't it?)

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not." in Reply To.
  #9  
Old May 22nd 14, 10:37 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Bowser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 265
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

On Mon, 19 May 2014 09:44:03 -0500, George Kerby
wrote:




On 5/19/14 8:48 AM, in article , "PAS"
wrote:


"Bowser" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 May 2014 23:00:22 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...t-shakes-up-mi
ssissippi-republican-primary/

the blogger was a tea party supporter. 'nuff said.


So am I. Don't got the way of a bigot and paint everyone with a broad
brush. What the blogger did is reprehensible but it is not a reflection on
the group, just himself.



"bowser" is a lapdog for dimwit libtards. He LOVES Uncle SugarDaddy running
his life, so that response was as expected...


Oh, how little you know...
  #10  
Old May 22nd 14, 11:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Giving photogs a bad name?

On 2014.05.22, 17:37 , Bowser wrote:

Oh, how little you know...


It knows that much? Amazing.

--
I was born a 1%er - I'm just more equal than the rest.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Giving photogs a bad name? Eric Stevens Digital Photography 9 May 20th 14 12:43 AM
Giving photogs a bad name? Savageduck[_3_] Digital Photography 4 May 18th 14 09:30 PM
Giving up. Pablo Digital Photography 56 November 7th 12 01:50 PM
Giving up Badasghan Lukacina APS Photographic Equipment 0 August 22nd 04 09:11 AM
Giving up Beneactiney Redgrave Film & Labs 0 August 21st 04 10:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.