Book Fair

Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/

Thanks for your comments.

--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com

On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:41:45 +0100, Bruce
wrote:

"mmyvusenet" wrote:
Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/

Thanks for your comments.



Truly multiple-"award"-winning.

I think Miguel's getting a bad rap on this Flickr "award" thing. It's
not his fault.

He may be using Flickr only because it's a convenient way to upload
and share his photos. He can't be blamed because the other viewers of
Flickr sites participate in that stupid claque system they have.



--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:08:20 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:41:45 +0100, Bruce
wrote:

"mmyvusenet" wrote:
Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/

Thanks for your comments.



Truly multiple-"award"-winning.

I think Miguel's getting a bad rap on this Flickr "award" thing. It's
not his fault.

He may be using Flickr only because it's a convenient way to upload
and share his photos. He can't be blamed because the other viewers of
Flickr sites participate in that stupid claque system they have.

I guess you've missed all his Flickr crapshot posts where he sincerely
thanks them for all their wonderful praise and awards, showing how he
clearly believes all of them. But then, you're about as observant as a
cave-fish, evidenced in your own craptography, so it's understood why you
are so incessantly ignorant.

Tell us all again about that blurry moth photo that you never saw, was
never posted, and was never claimed to have been posted. Your chronic
displays misinformation, dementia, and psychoses are so very entertaining
to all.

"tony cooper" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:41:45 +0100, Bruce
wrote:

"mmyvusenet" wrote:
Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/

Thanks for your comments.



Truly multiple-"award"-winning.

I think Miguel's getting a bad rap on this Flickr "award" thing. It's
not his fault.

He may be using Flickr only because it's a convenient way to upload
and share his photos. He can't be blamed because the other viewers of
Flickr sites participate in that stupid claque system they have.


I agree with Tony. Flickr is probably the most convenient way to show
photos and also, who doesn't enjoy praise? Even if it is superficial.
Miguel has considerably improved in some areas of his photography, and
others less, but I think he gets undue bashing in this group.

Tim Conway wrote:

Miguel has considerably improved in some areas of his photography, and
others less, but I think he gets undue bashing in this group.

Since Miguel never responds to questions about intent,
purpose or technique, I think the bashing is justified.

I've never searched, but I assume he spams his photos
all over the net to get views on Flickr.

BugBear

On Wed, 04 May 2011 02:40:05 GMT, MC wrote:

mmyvusenet wrote:

Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/


Why?

MC

To upset the know-it-alls on this group.

On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:41:18 +0100, bugbear
wrote:

Tim Conway wrote:

Miguel has considerably improved in some areas of his photography, and
others less, but I think he gets undue bashing in this group.

Since Miguel never responds to questions about intent,
purpose or technique, I think the bashing is justified.

What obligation has he do to do so? He doesn't seem to be comfortable
with English, and he does seem to be a non-comfrontationable sort, so
why should he have to mix it up with the likes of us?

I've never searched, but I assume he spams his photos
all over the net to get views on Flickr.

It's just as easy to assume he doesn't.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On Wed, 04 May 2011 06:01:09 -0500, Will T
wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:08:20 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:41:45 +0100, Bruce
wrote:

"mmyvusenet" wrote:
Hello:

I recently took this photo in the Historic Center of Lima:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/5659516873/

Thanks for your comments.



Truly multiple-"award"-winning.

I think Miguel's getting a bad rap on this Flickr "award" thing. It's
not his fault.

He may be using Flickr only because it's a convenient way to upload
and share his photos. He can't be blamed because the other viewers of
Flickr sites participate in that stupid claque system they have.

I guess you've missed all his Flickr crapshot posts where he sincerely
thanks them for all their wonderful praise and awards, showing how he
clearly believes all of them.

Ahhh, you're just upset because no one praises your fuzzy, muddy,
out-of-focus shots of rare moths. Or ever will.

I thought I'd downloaded and kept that photo of yours, but it turned
out that what I had was just a macro of a wad of chewing tobacco that
had been spit out.



--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

On Wed, 4 May 2011 10:32:07 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:

You're getting better.

horse-**** troll's advice snipped

Now why on earth do you think anyone would take advice, bad advice at that,
from a KNOWN AND PROVED PHOTO THIEF? Like all those images you steal from
others and then claim ownership of them, presenting them as your own. Like
this one:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink

When you hover your cursor on the "Belongs to" link, it clearly states
"Vance Lear".

Yet we find proof-positive that this image is owned and copyrighted by
someone else.

http://mothphotographersgroup.msstat...p?hodges=08262

With this copyright notice clearly stated at the beginning of that page:

"Photographs are the copyrighted property of each photographer listed.
Contact individual photographers for permission to use for any purpose."

You do understand the meaning of the word "any", don't you?

"Outing Trolls is FUN!" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2011 10:32:07 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:

You're getting better.

horse-**** troll's advice snipped

Now why on earth do you think anyone would take advice, bad advice at
that,
from a KNOWN AND PROVED PHOTO THIEF? Like all those images you steal from
others and then claim ownership of them, presenting them as your own. Like
this one:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink

When you hover your cursor on the "Belongs to" link, it clearly states
"Vance Lear".

Yet we find proof-positive that this image is owned and copyrighted by
someone else.

http://mothphotographersgroup.msstat...p?hodges=08262

With this copyright notice clearly stated at the beginning of that page:

"Photographs are the copyrighted property of each photographer listed.
Contact individual photographers for permission to use for any purpose."

You do understand the meaning of the word "any", don't you?

Uh, I don't know what dishonest game you're trying to play. It does not say
"Vance Lear" when I hover my cursor over it. It says "For Trolls" which
you have no doubt put there. If you don't have any substantial proof, I
suggest you shut up and leave.