If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see in magazine-ads doesn't make it right. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info
wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see in magazine-ads doesn't make it right. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see in magazine-ads doesn't make it right. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:40:55 -0500, Better Info
wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't supply an answer. A light box allows light to pass through it, albeit diffused light. A cardboard box does not. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see in magazine-ads doesn't make it right. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:43:20 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:40:55 -0500, Better Info wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't supply an answer. It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize that so there was no reason to repeat it again. A light box allows light to pass through it, WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO. No wonder that so many others have given up on correcting you. No doubt your wife and all others in your life have given up on you as well so you're now inflicting the whole world with your bull**** stupidity. You're nothing but a hopeless moron. Terminally so. For your own sake, and the sake of everyone else in the whole world -- PLEASE, GO ****IN' EDUCATE YOURSELF BEFORE TYPING ONE MORE WORD, EVER AGAIN. Correcting your relentless displays of ignorance is just hopelessly tedious nonsense. albeit diffused light. A cardboard box does not. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see in magazine-ads doesn't make it right. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info
wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't supply an answer. It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize that so there was no reason to repeat it again. A light box allows light to pass through it, WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO. Show me a link to one that doesn't. albeit diffused light. A cardboard box does not. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject. His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his statements with facts. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:03:23 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't supply an answer. It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize that so there was no reason to repeat it again. A light box allows light to pass through it, WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO. Show me a link to one that doesn't. http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 albeit diffused light. A cardboard box does not. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject. His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his statements with facts. You're refusal to go educate yourself and instead desperately try to get attention on usenet to fill your bottomless pit of "nobody gives a **** about you in your life" tells everyone much much more about you. ARRrrrr.... Man your harpoons men! Thar be TROLL! A big white one! LOL!!!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:03:23 -0400, tony cooper
wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info wrote: Check it out @ http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light. A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light WRONG. They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor construction. What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"? If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad rare moth pictures excluded) Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out. It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't supply an answer. It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize that so there was no reason to repeat it again. A light box allows light to pass through it, WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO. Show me a link to one that doesn't. http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 albeit diffused light. A cardboard box does not. sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being photographed. This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I just don't feel it's a "light box". This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject. His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his statements with facts. Your refusal to go educate yourself and instead desperately try to get attention on usenet to fill your bottomless pit of "nobody gives a **** about you in your life" tells everyone much much more about you. ARRrrrr.... Man your harpoons men! Thar be TROLL! A big white one! LOL!!!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Experimenting with DIY light box
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:20:12 -0500, Outing Trolls is FUN!
wrote: A light box allows light to pass through it, WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO. Show me a link to one that doesn't. http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071 Perfect example of circular logic. You have linked to the "light box" that triggered the comment that this is mistakenly identified by the poster as a "light box". It is not. It is a cardboard box that provides a background for the object and - at best - a very minimal amount of bounce light. It blocks the light from the sides and back that users of real light boxes employ. You can call a moth an eagle, but it doesn't make a moth an eagle. I am surprised, given Mothboy's propensity to fabricate tales about his life, that he did not tell us that he made his own light box from quartz that he personally mined in the Minas Gerais state in Brazil, trucked out on the backs of Pygmy Marmosets, and shaved into panels using Piranha teeth that he extracted whilst swimming naked in the Amazon. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimenting with Nikon defocus control (DC) | Paul Furman | Digital Photography | 1 | March 3rd 11 06:21 PM |
40D and experimenting | Charles[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 20 | March 1st 09 08:33 AM |
Sanjaia has me considering experimenting with the gay | Librarians are hiding something | Digital Photography | 0 | April 1st 07 03:19 AM |
Sanjaia has me considering experimenting with the gay | Librarians are hiding something | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | April 1st 07 03:19 AM |
Newbie interested in experimenting with MF - suggestions? | Chris Brown | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 10 | May 22nd 04 10:41 PM |