A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Experimenting with DIY light box



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 18th 11, 05:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light
sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
  #2  
Old March 19th 11, 12:57 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Better Info[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light


WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see
in magazine-ads doesn't make it right.

  #3  
Old March 19th 11, 04:28 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light


WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see
in magazine-ads doesn't make it right.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
  #4  
Old March 19th 11, 04:40 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Better Info[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light


WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.



sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see
in magazine-ads doesn't make it right.

  #5  
Old March 19th 11, 06:43 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:40:55 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light

WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.


It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to
the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't
supply an answer.

A light box allows light to pass through it, albeit diffused light. A
cardboard box does not.





sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".

Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see
in magazine-ads doesn't make it right.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
  #6  
Old March 19th 11, 07:17 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Better Info[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:43:20 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:40:55 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:28:59 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:57:03 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:23:27 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT), eNo
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light

WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.


It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to
the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't
supply an answer.


It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize
that so there was no reason to repeat it again.



A light box allows light to pass through it,


WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass
through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO.

No wonder that so many others have given up on correcting you. No doubt
your wife and all others in your life have given up on you as well so
you're now inflicting the whole world with your bull**** stupidity. You're
nothing but a hopeless moron. Terminally so.

For your own sake, and the sake of everyone else in the whole world --
PLEASE, GO ****IN' EDUCATE YOURSELF BEFORE TYPING ONE MORE WORD, EVER
AGAIN.

Correcting your relentless displays of ignorance is just hopelessly tedious
nonsense.



albeit diffused light. A
cardboard box does not.





sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".

Just because your only knowledge of photography is what you read(?) and see
in magazine-ads doesn't make it right.

  #7  
Old March 19th 11, 04:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light

WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.


It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to
the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't
supply an answer.


It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize
that so there was no reason to repeat it again.

A light box allows light to pass through it,


WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass
through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO.


Show me a link to one that doesn't.

albeit diffused light. A
cardboard box does not.

sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a
light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of
light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and
murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject.

His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that
he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his
statements with facts.






--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
  #8  
Old March 19th 11, 07:20 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Outing Trolls is FUN![_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 359
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:03:23 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light

WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.

It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to
the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't
supply an answer.


It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize
that so there was no reason to repeat it again.

A light box allows light to pass through it,


WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass
through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO.


Show me a link to one that doesn't.


http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


albeit diffused light. A
cardboard box does not.

sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a
light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of
light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and
murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject.

His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that
he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his
statements with facts.


You're refusal to go educate yourself and instead desperately try to get
attention on usenet to fill your bottomless pit of "nobody gives a ****
about you in your life" tells everyone much much more about you.

ARRrrrr.... Man your harpoons men! Thar be TROLL! A big white one!

LOL!!!!





  #9  
Old March 19th 11, 07:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Outing Trolls is FUN![_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 359
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:03:23 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:17:00 -0500, Better Info
wrote:

Check it out @
http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


That's not what I would call a light box. That's just a box to
provide a neutral background and little bit of bounce light.

A light box, or soft box, has translucent sides so external light

WRONG.

They CAN have translucent sides for more lighting and diffusing
possibilities, but that does not in and of itself make it a light-box. Its
function is what defines it as a light-box, not its materials nor
construction.

What is the function of the box shown that makes it a "light box"?

If you had ever taken a photograph with any kind of external lighting
other than the puny on-board flash of your Barbie P&S, you'd
understand what the function of a light box is. (Streetlights for bad
rare moth pictures excluded)


Hint: When you stop posting your vast array of ignorance in public, then
people who know far more than you ever will, will stop correcting you. It's
that simple. Let us all know when you figure that out.

It is noted that you did not answer the question. That translates to
the fact that you don't know what you're talking about and can't
supply an answer.


It had already been answered. You're just too much of a moron to realize
that so there was no reason to repeat it again.

A light box allows light to pass through it,


WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass
through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO.


Show me a link to one that doesn't.


http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071


albeit diffused light. A
cardboard box does not.

sources can be used without creating glare spots on the object being
photographed.

This is not to say that your box is not useful or a good backdrop. I
just don't feel it's a "light box".


This lack of understanding of why people who use a light box use a
light box constructed with translucent material sheds a great deal of
light on the reason that Mothboy's rare moth photo was so dark and
murky. He doesn't understand how to illuminate his subject.

His refusal to supply the reasoning behind his misstatement shows that
he doesn't know what he's talking about and can't support his
statements with facts.


Your refusal to go educate yourself and instead desperately try to get
attention on usenet to fill your bottomless pit of "nobody gives a ****
about you in your life" tells everyone much much more about you.

ARRrrrr.... Man your harpoons men! Thar be TROLL! A big white one!

LOL!!!!





  #10  
Old March 19th 11, 11:26 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Tony Cooper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,748
Default Experimenting with DIY light box

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:20:12 -0500, Outing Trolls is FUN!
wrote:

A light box allows light to pass through it,

WRONG AGAIN (like that's any surprise). It *CAN* allow light to pass
through some structural sides of it, BUT NOT ALL DO.


Show me a link to one that doesn't.


http://esfotoclix.com/blog1/?p=2071

Perfect example of circular logic. You have linked to the "light box"
that triggered the comment that this is mistakenly identified by the
poster as a "light box". It is not. It is a cardboard box that
provides a background for the object and - at best - a very minimal
amount of bounce light. It blocks the light from the sides and back
that users of real light boxes employ.

You can call a moth an eagle, but it doesn't make a moth an eagle.

I am surprised, given Mothboy's propensity to fabricate tales about
his life, that he did not tell us that he made his own light box from
quartz that he personally mined in the Minas Gerais state in Brazil,
trucked out on the backs of Pygmy Marmosets, and shaved into panels
using Piranha teeth that he extracted whilst swimming naked in the
Amazon.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Experimenting with Nikon defocus control (DC) Paul Furman Digital Photography 1 March 3rd 11 06:21 PM
40D and experimenting Charles[_2_] Digital SLR Cameras 20 March 1st 09 08:33 AM
Sanjaia has me considering experimenting with the gay Librarians are hiding something Digital Photography 0 April 1st 07 03:19 AM
Sanjaia has me considering experimenting with the gay Librarians are hiding something 35mm Photo Equipment 0 April 1st 07 03:19 AM
Newbie interested in experimenting with MF - suggestions? Chris Brown Medium Format Photography Equipment 10 May 22nd 04 10:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.