If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
Did you make the prints or look at negs only ?
I made prints from them and they were contrast-less and hard to print. The times given by Ilford are definitely too short. More realistic is to use times for 6400 or shot at 1600 and use times for 3200. I use the times for 3200 + 3-4 minutes I will try ID11 and Ilfotec DD-X. I love trying new developers! Thaks for the answer. Moda |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
Użytkownik "moda" napisał w wiadomo¶ci . .. Did you make the prints or look at negs only ? I made prints from them and they were contrast-less and hard to print. The times given by Ilford are definitely too short. More realistic is to use times for 6400 or shot at 1600 and use times for 3200. I use the times for 3200 + 3-4 minutes I will try ID11 and Ilfotec DD-X. I love trying new developers! My time for DD-X is 11 min and for ID-11 1+0 12 min in 20 Celcius. Remember using distilled water for the chemicals, always one shot ... also agitation is important. I agitate vigorously for the first 30 sek and than 10sec every minutes inversion. wkg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:02:20 +0200, "moda" wrote:
I have developed some Delta 3200@3200 (Ilford) in Rodinal (not the bedst for the job), HC-110 and Kodak T-Max. I have extended the development time and agitated a litte more than usual. the negs are still too thin....any recommendation on another developer? Microphen. Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
"moda" wrote
I love trying new developers! There are very few "new" developers. I think Ilford's DD-X is the most recent well knowen on the market. Rodinal is the most ancient. At least a few who post to this NG know of some good developers which are no longer marketed. If you really like testing out "new" brews you should invest in some chemicals and equipment for Homebrewing. More than a few do. Many, many, formulas can be compounded from a half-dozen chemicals. There really is'nt anything magic about off-the-shelf developers. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
I love trying new developers!
There are very few "new" developers. I think Ilford's DD-X is the most recent well knowen on the market. Rodinal is the most ancient. At least a few who post to this NG know of some good developers which are no longer marketed. If you really like testing out "new" brews you should invest in some chemicals and equipment for Homebrewing. More than a few do. Many, many, formulas can be compounded from a half-dozen chemicals. There really is'nt anything magic about off-the-shelf developers. To me more than few developers on the market are new to me. I am half newbee but knows quite a bit already. I will soon start to make my own developers which I think would be fun. Thanks for the tip. Moda |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Delta 3200
moda napisał(a):
Hi I have developed some Delta 3200@3200 (Ilford) in Rodinal (not the bedst for the job), HC-110 and Kodak T-Max. I have extended the development time and agitated a litte more than usual. the negs are still too thin....any recommendation on another developer? Moda Try Tetenal Ultrafin Plus 1+4 at 9 minutes for rotary processing or 14 minutes with 4 tank inversions during first 10 seconds of every minute if you don't use rotary processor. I'm just looking at my Delta 3200 developed this way (rotary processing) and it has good contrast. Best regards Jakub |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|