A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » Film & Labs
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

35mm slides from digital images



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 2nd 04, 12:11 AM
Tom Monego
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Polaroid made crap film recorders until their last model when they finally came
close to getting it right. Work from a Matrix, Agfa, Mangement Graphics or the
top dog Celco makes Polaroid slides look like mush. Again their last 8000 line
unit did work about as good as 4000 line units from other companies. If you are
making slides from digital files ask what film recorder the lab is using if
they say Polaroid go elsewhere, there is a world of difference.

Tom

In article zp9rd.375239$a85.104940@fed1read04,
says...


"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

Has anyone tried this? Results?
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/image_...5406&pid=66497
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/

The max res is 2732 x 4096 (11.2 Mpix)

$2.49 for 1 slide; 1.25 per additional slide of same image.


Sounds interesting. At $2.50 a pop, doesn't sound like too much to try
them out, unless they have prohibitively high shipping costs or insane
minimum orders.

Additionally, I don't know what the hell I'd do with them. I haven't
projected slides in... forever.


Why...you'd scan them back into your computer, of course!




  #32  
Old December 2nd 04, 12:11 AM
Tom Monego
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Polaroid made crap film recorders until their last model when they finally came
close to getting it right. Work from a Matrix, Agfa, Mangement Graphics or the
top dog Celco makes Polaroid slides look like mush. Again their last 8000 line
unit did work about as good as 4000 line units from other companies. If you are
making slides from digital files ask what film recorder the lab is using if
they say Polaroid go elsewhere, there is a world of difference.

Tom

In article zp9rd.375239$a85.104940@fed1read04,
says...


"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

Has anyone tried this? Results?
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/image_...5406&pid=66497
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/

The max res is 2732 x 4096 (11.2 Mpix)

$2.49 for 1 slide; 1.25 per additional slide of same image.


Sounds interesting. At $2.50 a pop, doesn't sound like too much to try
them out, unless they have prohibitively high shipping costs or insane
minimum orders.

Additionally, I don't know what the hell I'd do with them. I haven't
projected slides in... forever.


Why...you'd scan them back into your computer, of course!




  #33  
Old December 2nd 04, 12:11 AM
Tom Monego
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Polaroid made crap film recorders until their last model when they finally came
close to getting it right. Work from a Matrix, Agfa, Mangement Graphics or the
top dog Celco makes Polaroid slides look like mush. Again their last 8000 line
unit did work about as good as 4000 line units from other companies. If you are
making slides from digital files ask what film recorder the lab is using if
they say Polaroid go elsewhere, there is a world of difference.

Tom

In article zp9rd.375239$a85.104940@fed1read04,
says...


"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

Has anyone tried this? Results?
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/image_...5406&pid=66497
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/

The max res is 2732 x 4096 (11.2 Mpix)

$2.49 for 1 slide; 1.25 per additional slide of same image.


Sounds interesting. At $2.50 a pop, doesn't sound like too much to try
them out, unless they have prohibitively high shipping costs or insane
minimum orders.

Additionally, I don't know what the hell I'd do with them. I haven't
projected slides in... forever.


Why...you'd scan them back into your computer, of course!




  #34  
Old December 2nd 04, 02:10 AM
Bandicoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"McLeod" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:17:59 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote:


Has anyone tried this? Results?
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/image_...5406&pid=66497
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/

The max res is 2732 x 4096 (11.2 Mpix)

$2.49 for 1 slide; 1.25 per additional slide of same image.


Haven't tried this but have used an old (1997) Polaroid film recorder
with excellent results.


One of those sold on *bay recently for - if I remember - $0.01 (plus
shipping...)


Peter


  #35  
Old December 2nd 04, 02:10 AM
Bandicoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"McLeod" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:17:59 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote:


Has anyone tried this? Results?
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/image_...5406&pid=66497
http://www.iprintfromhome.com/

The max res is 2732 x 4096 (11.2 Mpix)

$2.49 for 1 slide; 1.25 per additional slide of same image.


Haven't tried this but have used an old (1997) Polaroid film recorder
with excellent results.


One of those sold on *bay recently for - if I remember - $0.01 (plus
shipping...)


Peter


  #36  
Old December 2nd 04, 10:33 AM
Magnus W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote in :

The latest generation of SCSI disks+controllers can move 320MB/s - yes
320 Mega bytes/second peak. And SCSI is still being improved. Yet those
same 320MB/s disks will fit in machines that have old controllers of 5
MB/s. They just run at 5MB/s.


For years, my public web/mail server was running a Quantum Empire SCSI
drive on a -- Trantor T128 controller (8-bit ISA, SCSI-1). This wasn't /so/
long ago, four to five years or so, well into the PCI age :-) The drive
crashed, unfortunately, and since then I have been running IDE, not because
of any controller problem but rather because I at the time of panic rebuild
didn't have a spare SCSI drive. It always gave me a kind of perverse
satisfaction to know that I was using a 286-era disk controller with
otherwise modern Pentium class equipment.
  #37  
Old December 2nd 04, 10:33 AM
Magnus W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote in :

The latest generation of SCSI disks+controllers can move 320MB/s - yes
320 Mega bytes/second peak. And SCSI is still being improved. Yet those
same 320MB/s disks will fit in machines that have old controllers of 5
MB/s. They just run at 5MB/s.


For years, my public web/mail server was running a Quantum Empire SCSI
drive on a -- Trantor T128 controller (8-bit ISA, SCSI-1). This wasn't /so/
long ago, four to five years or so, well into the PCI age :-) The drive
crashed, unfortunately, and since then I have been running IDE, not because
of any controller problem but rather because I at the time of panic rebuild
didn't have a spare SCSI drive. It always gave me a kind of perverse
satisfaction to know that I was using a 286-era disk controller with
otherwise modern Pentium class equipment.
  #40  
Old December 3rd 04, 09:31 AM
ryder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.ardice.com/Business/Busin...gs/35mm_Slides
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sad news for film-based photography Ronald Shu Medium Format Photography Equipment 199 October 6th 04 01:34 AM
Future of MF Victor Medium Format Photography Equipment 174 September 19th 04 11:53 PM
Scanning Film Images into Digital Files Michael Digital Photography 21 September 18th 04 09:47 PM
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? Toralf Digital Photography 213 July 28th 04 06:30 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.