If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
I was given some excellent advice here about a year ago .
My Canon G1X has proven to be an excellent choice for my "shoot from the hip" candid shots. I really love the fold out view screen. The only minor issue is that there is a slight delay at times when I press the shutter. One of my friends told me a full sized Nikon would be much faster. I mentioned a while ago that I now have the use of a Nikon D5200 so finally decided to put it to the test. If I use the fold out viewing screen it is actually slower than the G1X and can take up to a second to focus and shoot. If I do not use the viewing screen and just use the viewfinder...the camera is lightning fast. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 26/05/2014 14:32, philo wrote:
I was given some excellent advice here about a year ago . My Canon G1X has proven to be an excellent choice for my "shoot from the hip" candid shots. I really love the fold out view screen. The only minor issue is that there is a slight delay at times when I press the shutter. One of my friends told me a full sized Nikon would be much faster. I mentioned a while ago that I now have the use of a Nikon D5200 so finally decided to put it to the test. If I use the fold out viewing screen it is actually slower than the G1X and can take up to a second to focus and shoot. If I do not use the viewing screen and just use the viewfinder...the camera is lightning fast. Yes, this is normal. The "Live View" mode uses a contrast-detect focus method (as the normal auto-focus sensors can no longer "see" the image, and that is a lot slower on the D5200 than the normal auto-focus sensors. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 05/26/2014 10:04 AM, David Taylor wrote:
On 26/05/2014 14:32, philo wrote: I was given some excellent advice here about a year ago . My Canon G1X has proven to be an excellent choice for my "shoot from the hip" candid shots. I really love the fold out view screen. The only minor issue is that there is a slight delay at times when I press the shutter. One of my friends told me a full sized Nikon would be much faster. I mentioned a while ago that I now have the use of a Nikon D5200 so finally decided to put it to the test. If I use the fold out viewing screen it is actually slower than the G1X and can take up to a second to focus and shoot. If I do not use the viewing screen and just use the viewfinder...the camera is lightning fast. Yes, this is normal. The "Live View" mode uses a contrast-detect focus method (as the normal auto-focus sensors can no longer "see" the image, and that is a lot slower on the D5200 than the normal auto-focus sensors. OK thanks. Oddly enough, when taking candid photos, a slight shutter delay adds to the randomness...as what I see is not exactly what I get. Sometimes I may miss the exact shot I wanted and at other times get something even better. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 26/05/2014 16:52, philo wrote:
[] OK thanks. Oddly enough, when taking candid photos, a slight shutter delay adds to the randomness...as what I see is not exactly what I get. Sometimes I may miss the exact shot I wanted and at other times get something even better. If you don't mind the noise, you could use burst mode! Perhaps attracts too much attention for candids! Or if HD resolution is enough, use video. But perhaps the randomness adds to the fun! I wonder how recent MFT (micro four-thirds) cameras compare in response to the shutter press? Better than the Nikon D5200 in LiveView, but better or worse than the Canon G1X? -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 5/26/2014 2:33 PM, David Taylor wrote:
On 26/05/2014 16:52, philo wrote: [] OK thanks. Oddly enough, when taking candid photos, a slight shutter delay adds to the randomness...as what I see is not exactly what I get. Sometimes I may miss the exact shot I wanted and at other times get something even better. If you don't mind the noise, you could use burst mode! Perhaps attracts too much attention for candids! Or if HD resolution is enough, use video. But perhaps the randomness adds to the fun! What program do you use to convert videoto still? -- PeterN |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
In article , philo* wrote:
I was given some excellent advice here about a year ago . My Canon G1X has proven to be an excellent choice for my "shoot from the hip" candid shots. I really love the fold out view screen. The only minor issue is that there is a slight delay at times when I press the shutter. One of my friends told me a full sized Nikon would be much faster. I mentioned a while ago that I now have the use of a Nikon D5200 so finally decided to put it to the test. If I use the fold out viewing screen it is actually slower than the G1X and can take up to a second to focus and shoot. If I do not use the viewing screen and just use the viewfinder...the camera is lightning fast. Yes, as mentioned, this is normal. Contrast-based auto-focus is slower. And phase detection, which is what the Nikon uses, is a lot faster. There are mirrorless cameras with phase detection, like the Nikon 1, Canon EOS M, Fujifilm X-T1, Olympus E-M1, and Sony NEX-5R/6, A6000 and A7, but in most cases, these cameras phase detection focusing is still slower (sometimes a lot slower) than phase detection in a good SLR. Most people claim that the Sony A7 has the fastest mirrorless phase detection currently. Mine hasn't arrived yet so I can't confirm. It is also small and compact, but rather expensive - more than twice the price of the Canon, and that's without a lens. -- Sandman[.net] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 05/26/2014 01:33 PM, David Taylor wrote:
On 26/05/2014 16:52, philo wrote: [] OK thanks. Oddly enough, when taking candid photos, a slight shutter delay adds to the randomness...as what I see is not exactly what I get. Sometimes I may miss the exact shot I wanted and at other times get something even better. If you don't mind the noise, you could use burst mode! Perhaps attracts too much attention for candids! Or if HD resolution is enough, use video. But perhaps the randomness adds to the fun! I wonder how recent MFT (micro four-thirds) cameras compare in response to the shutter press? Better than the Nikon D5200 in LiveView, but better or worse than the Canon G1X? The G1-X is really perfect for what I am doing...so that will be my main camera. I enjoy the randomness. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On Mon, 26 May 2014 19:33:04 +0100, David Taylor
wrote: : On 26/05/2014 16:52, philo wrote: : [] : OK thanks. : : Oddly enough, when taking candid photos, a slight shutter delay adds to : the randomness...as what I see is not exactly what I get. : : : Sometimes I may miss the exact shot I wanted and at other times get : something even better. : : If you don't mind the noise, you could use burst mode! Perhaps attracts : too much attention for candids! Or if HD resolution is enough, use : video. But perhaps the randomness adds to the fun! Depends on your definition of "fun". When Martha and I had Canon P&Ses (much more primitive ones than Philo's, to be sure), the shutter lag nearly drove us batty. That's why we bought our first pair of DSLRs. All's well that ends well, I guess. Bob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 26/05/2014 22:41, PeterN wrote:
[] What program do you use to convert video to still? It's not something I've done for some time, Peter, but one of the usual video editing or conversion programs. Perhaps from DivX converter, or VLC Media Player or Virtual Dub or .... -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is this normal?
On 2014-05-27 05:27:33 +0000, David Taylor
said: On 26/05/2014 22:41, PeterN wrote: [] What program do you use to convert video to still? It's not something I've done for some time, Peter, but one of the usual video editing or conversion programs. Perhaps from DivX converter, or VLC Media Player or Virtual Dub or .... I am sure it is possible to find an app to convert video to still. For now the only information I can provide is that you can take VLC Media Player *Snapshots* in JPEG or PNG at the set playback resolution. With Quicktime Player you can select to view the frames and then make a screen capture, but it is not exactly the best way of going about it. LR5 can import a video and you can make a frame capture, as I did with this iPhone 4S video. I am sure that with better technique and video camera (my D300S perhaps) I might have got better quality. Video: https://db.tt/tGrhOtOx LR5 Frame captu https://db.tt/qhH9SsAL -- Regards, Savageduck |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Normal lens | Superzooms Still Win[_2_] | Digital Photography | 5 | January 12th 11 05:26 PM |
Not Your Normal Photography Course | Ric Trexell | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | February 5th 06 06:51 AM |
Is this normal? (D70) | Sheldon | Digital SLR Cameras | 13 | May 18th 05 02:15 AM |
Fine vs Normal | Dave C. | Digital Photography | 5 | October 26th 04 08:11 PM |
SB-28 (normal) on a D70? | Dallas | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | October 4th 04 06:21 PM |