In-body VR inferior to In-Lens?

http://www.imx.nl/photo/technique/vi...n_compare.html

"RichA" wrote in message
...
http://www.imx.nl/photo/technique/vi...n_compare.html

Pity they did not compare apples to apples, why is it that these so called
experts continue to compare oranges to bananas?? I have no doubt that the in
lens system is better but with the in camera system all your lenses get some
benefit at no cost and that is a great thing.

I would have thought that comparing an APS-C in camera system to a an APS-C
in lens system would have told us a lot more about the differences between
in camera and in lens systems.

Pete D wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
http://www.imx.nl/photo/technique/vi...n_compare.html

Pity they did not compare apples to apples, why is it that these so called
experts continue to compare oranges to bananas?? I have no doubt that the in
lens system is better but with the in camera system all your lenses get some
benefit at no cost and that is a great thing.

I would have thought that comparing an APS-C in camera system to a an APS-C
in lens system would have told us a lot more about the differences between
in camera and in lens systems.




Pete, that won't work because it makes too much sense.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

"Jer" wrote in message
news:YIadnUOoWrjFNWXanZ2dnUVZ_r7inZ2d@internetamer ica...
Pete D wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
http://www.imx.nl/photo/technique/vi...n_compare.html

Pity they did not compare apples to apples, why is it that these so
called experts continue to compare oranges to bananas?? I have no doubt
that the in lens system is better but with the in camera system all your
lenses get some benefit at no cost and that is a great thing.

I would have thought that comparing an APS-C in camera system to a an
APS-C in lens system would have told us a lot more about the differences
between in camera and in lens systems.


Pete, that won't work because it makes too much sense.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Yeah, what was I thinking? ;-)

And to make themselves look as stupid as they possible could they used a
full frame and a 2x crop factor camera!!!

They should have their reviewers license taken away from them.

Pete D wrote:
"Jer" wrote in message
news:YIadnUOoWrjFNWXanZ2dnUVZ_r7inZ2d@internetamer ica...
Pete D wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message
...
http://www.imx.nl/photo/technique/vi...n_compare.html
Pity they did not compare apples to apples, why is it that these so
called experts continue to compare oranges to bananas?? I have no doubt
that the in lens system is better but with the in camera system all your
lenses get some benefit at no cost and that is a great thing.

I would have thought that comparing an APS-C in camera system to a an
APS-C in lens system would have told us a lot more about the differences
between in camera and in lens systems.

Pete, that won't work because it makes too much sense.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Yeah, what was I thinking? ;-)

And to make themselves look as stupid as they possible could they used a
full frame and a 2x crop factor camera!!!

They should have their reviewers license taken away from them.




Or message the editor of rags that publish that kind of shill trash,
drawing a few of your own comparisons as examples of how to do it more
accurately. Editors love my feedback, not that they could read it aloud
in mixed company.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Pete D wrote:

They should have their reviewers license taken away from them.

But what would RichA do then?

-Wolfgang