|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 11th 10, 03:26 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Binary Date
Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big
thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier 
|
|
#2
October 11th 10, 03:38 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
* Gary Eickmeier wrote :
Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier 101010 is binary for 42: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11511219 -- Troy Piggins
|
|
#3
October 11th 10, 04:01 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
"Troy Piggins" wrote in message ... * Gary Eickmeier wrote : Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier 101010 is binary for 42: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11511219 Yipes! The prophesy is true! Gary Eickmeier
|
|
#4
October 11th 10, 04:08 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote:
Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01.
|
|
#5
October 11th 10, 04:29 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
On 2010-10-10 20:08:56 -0700, ray said:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote: Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01. I think you might find your answer he http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/C...ational_binary -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
#6
October 11th 10, 05:25 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010101020290986357-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-10-10 20:08:56 -0700, ray said: On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote: Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01. I think you might find your answer he http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/C...ational_binary Hmmmm - looks like a job for Nicholas Cage. Gary Eickmeier
|
|
#7
October 11th 10, 03:32 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
On 10/10/2010 11:08 PM, ray wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote: Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01. Size matters, or so they tell me.
|
|
#8
October 11th 10, 04:32 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
Dave Cohen wrote:
On 10/10/2010 11:08 PM, ray wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote: Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01. Size matters, or so they tell me. Well, in that case, 12/12/12 is the one to watch for. After that, we'll have to wait for the next 01/01/01, but I doubt if any of us will make it for that one. Allen
|
|
#9
October 11th 10, 06:07 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
On 2010-10-11 08:32:42 -0700, Allen said:
Dave Cohen wrote: On 10/10/2010 11:08 PM, ray wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:26:22 -0400, Gary Eickmeier wrote: Hey! It's 10/10/10! Don't we have to do something about this? Next big thrill will be 11/11/11. I'm just sayin... Gary Eickmeier Please explain to me why it's any more significant than, say, 01/01/01. Size matters, or so they tell me. Well, in that case, 12/12/12 is the one to watch for. ....but that is not even the pseudo binary of 01/01/01 or 10/10/10! After that, we'll have to wait for the next 01/01/01, but I doubt if any of us will make it for that one. Some geeks will be troubled souls forever. So let's just leave it at 000000. -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
#10
October 11th 10, 07:28 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Binary Date
On 2010-10-11 10:33:43 -0700, Twibil said:
On Oct 11, 10:07*am, Savageduck wrote: After that, we'll have to wait for the next 01/01/01, but I doubt if any of us will make it for that one. Some geeks will be troubled souls forever. So let's just leave it at 0000 00. Interestingly enough, "000000!" is the sound that was made by the crowd watching Evel Knievel attempt his jump across the Snake River Canyon. (And he didn't make it either.) Coincidence or conspiracy? You decide. Aah! but it is the modifying "!" which makes all the difference in binary numerical, or crowd-audio effect code conversion. -- Regards, Savageduck
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Test #3: again, all including binary | bowser | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | January 11th 09 01:31 PM |
| Test #2: all except binary, again | Rol_Lei Nut | Digital Photography | 0 | January 11th 09 09:24 AM |
| Test #2: all except binary | bowser | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | January 11th 09 09:23 AM |
| binary newsgroups? | Beck | Digital Photography | 12 | April 17th 06 10:19 AM |
| Photoshop shortcuts (I know it's a binary but it's useful!) | SleeperMan | Digital Photography | 11 | February 15th 05 04:28 AM |
Linear Mode
