I Hope That Canon Watched Today's Apple Event

In article 2015090920574128144-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Then there was also the demo of Adobe Photoshop "6" on the iPad Pro
today. It is scheduled for an October release.

which is odd, given that the ipad pro comes out in november.

The Adobe Mobile apps are iOS and not exclusive to the iPad Pro.

true, but the main attraction is using the stylus with it, and on a
larger display.

Absolutely.
...and the iPad Pro is so very tempting, but I have other things to do
and acquire first.

like the new 6s/6s+

On 2015-09-10 04:03:46 +0000, nospam said:

In article 2015090920574128144-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Then there was also the demo of Adobe Photoshop "6" on the iPad Pro
today. It is scheduled for an October release.

which is odd, given that the ipad pro comes out in november.

The Adobe Mobile apps are iOS and not exclusive to the iPad Pro.

true, but the main attraction is using the stylus with it, and on a
larger display.

Absolutely.
...and the iPad Pro is so very tempting, but I have other things to do
and acquire first.

like the new 6s/6s+

That is one of the target zones.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

Drat! Caught by a bottom-post enforcer!

Eric Stevens:
[Unwrapped and bottom posted version.]

...

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:17:10 -0400, Davoud wrote:

Drat! Caught by a bottom-post enforcer!

Eric Stevens:
[Unwrapped and bottom posted version.]

...

I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap the
URL.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Drat! Caught by a bottom-post enforcer!

Eric Stevens:
[Unwrapped and bottom posted version.]

...

I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap the
URL.

a task that computers can do automatically.

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:17:09 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Drat! Caught by a bottom-post enforcer!

Eric Stevens:
[Unwrapped and bottom posted version.]

...

I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap the
URL.

a task that computers can do automatically.

I know, I know ... but the evidence is that most of them don't.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap the
URL.

a task that computers can do automatically.

I know, I know ... but the evidence is that most of them don't.

nope. most do.

yours might not thought.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap the
URL.

a task that computers can do automatically.

I know, I know ... but the evidence is that most of them don't.

nope. most do.

yours might not thought.

None do. None at all. Unwrapping URLs is not a computer function.
Never has been. Never will be.

wrong. it absolutely is a computer function.

I'm surprised the Mr noitall doesn't know the difference between a
computer and software. He's broken.

arguing just to argue, i see.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't decided to (helpfully) unwrap
the
URL.

a task that computers can do automatically.

I know, I know ... but the evidence is that most of them don't.

nope. most do.

yours might not thought.

None do. None at all. Unwrapping URLs is not a computer function.
Never has been. Never will be.

wrong. it absolutely is a computer function.

I'm surprised the Mr noitall doesn't know the difference between a
computer and software. He's broken.

arguing just to argue, i see.

Nope. It's a software function. My newsreader, Forte Agent, does not
automatically unwrap. On the same computer, but using a different
newsreader's software, URLs would be unwrapped.

you truly are an idiot. software requires hardware. software does not
run in a vacuum. when someone says computer, they do not mean a
computer void of all software. *every* computer has software on it.
every single one.

you are once again, arguing to argue and showing just how dumb you
really are.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

Nope. It's a software function. My newsreader, Forte Agent, does not
automatically unwrap. On the same computer, but using a different
newsreader's software, URLs would be unwrapped.

you truly are an idiot. software requires hardware. software does not
run in a vacuum. when someone says computer, they do not mean a
computer void of all software. *every* computer has software on it.
every single one.

you are once again, arguing to argue and showing just how dumb you
really are.

Of course software requires hardware to run on, but the function of
unwrapping URLs is in the software not the hardware and you know it.

i'm not the one arguing over the difference.

Your statement is very specific: "(it's) a computer function". This
would mean that the computer, not the software, provides the function.

all computers need software. otherwise do nothing but take up space.

It is not a question of a computer running void of all software, but
about *which* software is used on the computer.

There is no way that I can invoke a computer function to automatically
unwrap URLs in this newsgroup if I continue to use the newsreader
software that I use.

then the software you're using is ****ty and outdated, just like the
rest of the things you use.

What you are doing is your usual weaseling around to to cover up
making a misstatement. The proper answer you should have provided is
"a task that computer software can do automatically". You need not
have included "computer" in that sentence at all since it would be
assumed the software runs on a computer.

nonsense.

you're arguing over something completely stupid and irrelevant because
you're bored and have nothing better to do.

every computer has software and when someone says a computer can do
something, they mean the entire package, hardware, software and
firmware (something you neglected to mention).