|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
October 26th 07, 03:18 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Full Moon Handheld
I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I
tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Roger 
|
|
#2
October 26th 07, 03:39 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Roger Impressive !!
|
|
#3
October 26th 07, 03:51 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)"
wrote in message ... I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Quite impressive! You don't mention it but were you using some form of image stabilisation? -- Jim Silverton Potomac, Maryland
|
|
#4
October 26th 07, 04:08 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
James Silverton wrote:
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Quite impressive! You don't mention it but were you using some form of image stabilisation? Very impressive. Roger lists an IS lens, but not whether IS was enabled. Cheers, David
|
|
#5
October 26th 07, 11:15 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
David J Taylor wrote:
James Silverton wrote: "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Quite impressive! You don't mention it but were you using some form of image stabilisation? Very impressive. Roger lists an IS lens, but not whether IS was enabled. Yes, IS was on. Roger
|
|
#6
October 27th 07, 07:16 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
David J Taylor wrote: [] Very impressive. Roger lists an IS lens, but not whether IS was enabled. Yes, IS was on. Roger I guessed it would be, Roger. Thanks, David
|
|
#7
October 26th 07, 05:03 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... I finally had a night with a steady atmosphere, so I tried imaging the full moon handheld at 1000 mm (real focal length): http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries...3f-8s-800.html This was done standing up with no supports and not leaning against anything. The full resolution image can be seen from the above page. Roger Over exposed, lost detail. Just another unremarkable moon shot I'm afraid. The fact that it is hand-held is completly irrelevant
|
|
#8
October 26th 07, 09:37 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
"Battleax" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Over exposed, lost detail. Just another unremarkable moon shot I'm afraid. The fact that it is hand-held is completly irrelevant Sure, you'll prefer this 500mm NOT handheld: http://baron.phpnet.us/50-500/crw_05...?size=1&exif=Y (a few days before)... mb
|
|
#9
October 26th 07, 11:14 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
Saguenay wrote:
"Battleax" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Sure, you'll prefer this 500mm NOT handheld: http://baron.phpnet.us/50-500/crw_05...?size=1&exif=Y (a few days before)... Saguenay Very nice image. But you'll just make the troll more jealous. Roger
|
|
#10
November 6th 07, 06:35 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Full Moon Handheld
"Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" wrote in message ... Saguenay wrote: "Battleax" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Sure, you'll prefer this 500mm NOT handheld: http://baron.phpnet.us/50-500/crw_05...?size=1&exif=Y (a few days before)... Saguenay Very nice image. But you'll just make the troll more jealous. Roger Troll? I think that it would appear that he was quite correct from this demonstration, why call him a troll.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Full Moon | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 24 | January 6th 07 05:43 AM |
| Full Moon 2 | RichG | Digital Photography | 1 | January 4th 07 08:01 AM |
| The Moon handheld | Frank ess | Digital Photography | 5 | January 30th 05 12:31 AM |
| The Moon handheld | dj NME | Digital Photography | 0 | January 29th 05 04:00 PM |
| The Moon handheld | dj NME | Digital Photography | 0 | January 29th 05 04:00 PM |
Hybrid Mode
