If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Magnificent advancements in digital!
Okay, I was, for some indeterminate reason, poking around in the photo
department of Wal-Mart yesterday, and for those unfamiliar with this line of stores, they are a do-it-all-halfass chain of department stores specializing in snack foods... So I was chatting with the woman staffing the photo department about the wonderful range of digital cameras they offer there, most of which I would have trouble finding in the same pocket as my keys. What came next stunned me though, as I was informed that some digitals have now advanced beyond 35mm cameras - they go up to 38mm! Is this true? Is it time to ditch my Canon (and Olympus) stuff and go with the superior benefits of 38mm? That's nearly a ten percent increase, which beats hell out of my pay raises the past couple of years. I have little reason to distrust her, since she told me about using her OM-PC (35mm) outfit for the past 24 years, but finally relented and got herself a Kodak digital camera that produced, and I kid you not, *4*, that's right, *four* megapixels. If pixels were dollars, that would mean two thirds of a bionic man, just to put this in perspective. I'm torn. I mean, I would love a camera with controls I have to operate with my fingernails, not to mention never having to change lenses, but my photography clothes aren't accessorized for grey plastic cameras, and this would mean an additional expense to remain fashionable. Is this justified for that 10% increase, in the long run I mean? Looking for input, - Al. P.S. Alan, this is NOT my entry for SI-FI, since I think you said those had to be made up... -- To reply, insert a dash between "wading" and "in". Please excuse the changed format, I'm working remotely. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Al Denelsbeck wrote:
I'm torn. I mean, I would love a camera with controls I have to operate with my fingernails, not to mention never having to change lenses, but my photography clothes aren't accessorized for grey plastic cameras, and this would mean an additional expense to remain fashionable. You mean you forgot to ask about the automatic accessory clothing 50% discount they offer with all 38mm camera purchases??? Boy, they sure saw you coming! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Al Denelsbeck wrote:
I'm torn. I mean, I would love a camera with controls I have to operate with my fingernails, not to mention never having to change lenses, but my photography clothes aren't accessorized for grey plastic cameras, and this would mean an additional expense to remain fashionable. You mean you forgot to ask about the automatic accessory clothing 50% discount they offer with all 38mm camera purchases??? Boy, they sure saw you coming! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... Okay, I was, for some indeterminate reason, poking around in the photo department of Wal-Mart yesterday, and for those unfamiliar with this line of stores, they are a do-it-all-halfass chain of department stores specializing in snack foods... Hey, Wrong forum. This is the 35mm group, not the 38mm group... That's what you get for poking around in Wal-Mart. FYI, they have them here in Europe as well... Don't let her get her hands on one with a Zoom lens that goes up to 70mm. She'll think it's a Medium Format:~))) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... Okay, I was, for some indeterminate reason, poking around in the photo department of Wal-Mart yesterday, and for those unfamiliar with this line of stores, they are a do-it-all-halfass chain of department stores specializing in snack foods... Hey, Wrong forum. This is the 35mm group, not the 38mm group... That's what you get for poking around in Wal-Mart. FYI, they have them here in Europe as well... Don't let her get her hands on one with a Zoom lens that goes up to 70mm. She'll think it's a Medium Format:~))) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... I have little reason to distrust her, since she told me about using her OM-PC (35mm) outfit for the past 24 years, but finally relented and got herself a Kodak digital camera that produced, and I kid you not, *4*, that's right, *four* megapixels. She is typical of the millions of consumers that are abandoning film and are quite content with the results they get from digital cameras. She and others like her are the reason that film manufacturing and distribution are now mature industries, and will likely decline drastically. Even though her remarks were amusing, it was the millions of consumers like her that made photographic film and products so readily accessible to those of us that had a more intense interest in photography. Give it 10 years, and I'll bet you will have to buy film either at specialty stores or by mail order--certainly not at every corner drug store or department store. So, while she may have been funny, her remarks were tragic, too. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... I have little reason to distrust her, since she told me about using her OM-PC (35mm) outfit for the past 24 years, but finally relented and got herself a Kodak digital camera that produced, and I kid you not, *4*, that's right, *four* megapixels. She is typical of the millions of consumers that are abandoning film and are quite content with the results they get from digital cameras. She and others like her are the reason that film manufacturing and distribution are now mature industries, and will likely decline drastically. Even though her remarks were amusing, it was the millions of consumers like her that made photographic film and products so readily accessible to those of us that had a more intense interest in photography. Give it 10 years, and I'll bet you will have to buy film either at specialty stores or by mail order--certainly not at every corner drug store or department store. So, while she may have been funny, her remarks were tragic, too. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeremy" wrote in message hlink.net... "Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... I have little reason to distrust her, since she told me about using her OM-PC (35mm) outfit for the past 24 years, but finally relented and got herself a Kodak digital camera that produced, and I kid you not, *4*, that's right, *four* megapixels. She is typical of the millions of consumers that are abandoning film and are quite content with the results they get from digital cameras. She and others like her are the reason that film manufacturing and distribution are now mature industries, and will likely decline drastically. Even though her remarks were amusing, it was the millions of consumers like her that made photographic film and products so readily accessible to those of us that had a more intense interest in photography. Give it 10 years, and I'll bet you will have to buy film either at specialty stores or by order--certainly not at every corner drug store or department store. So, while she may have been funny, her remarks were tragic, too. Good points, Jeremy, but where do you get most of your film now? Jim Kramer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeremy" wrote in message hlink.net... "Al Denelsbeck" wrote in message ... I have little reason to distrust her, since she told me about using her OM-PC (35mm) outfit for the past 24 years, but finally relented and got herself a Kodak digital camera that produced, and I kid you not, *4*, that's right, *four* megapixels. She is typical of the millions of consumers that are abandoning film and are quite content with the results they get from digital cameras. She and others like her are the reason that film manufacturing and distribution are now mature industries, and will likely decline drastically. Even though her remarks were amusing, it was the millions of consumers like her that made photographic film and products so readily accessible to those of us that had a more intense interest in photography. Give it 10 years, and I'll bet you will have to buy film either at specialty stores or by order--certainly not at every corner drug store or department store. So, while she may have been funny, her remarks were tragic, too. Good points, Jeremy, but where do you get most of your film now? Jim Kramer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Al Denelsbeck choreographed a chorus line of high-kicking electrons to
spell out: Okay, I was, for some indeterminate reason, poking around in the photo department of Wal-Mart yesterday, and for those unfamiliar with this line of stores, they are a do-it-all-halfass chain of department stores specializing in snack foods... Well, it's good to see that you and at least a small portion of Florida have made it through the most recent hurricane OK... Best question I heard recently involved whether a Pentax 90WR could be used as a manual SLR. -- __ A L L D O N E! B Y E B Y E! (__ * _ _ _ _ __)|| | |(_)| \ "...and then, the squirrels attacked." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
New Leica digital back info.... | Barney | 35mm Photo Equipment | 19 | June 30th 04 12:45 AM |
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | June 19th 04 05:48 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |