A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

definition



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 28th 04, 10:20 PM
Roland Karlsson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Woodchuck Bill wrote in news:Xns95AF5D84091EAbswr607h4
@130.133.1.4:

Sort of, there are at least two Digital SLR Cameras out there from
Olympus the E-10 and E-20 neither of which had interchangeable lenses.


Those are ZLRs.


Yes they are - and they are also SLR. ZLR is Olympus name
for an SLR camera with a non interchangable zoom lens.


/Roland
  #22  
Old November 29th 04, 01:36 AM
Michael Meissner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"David J Taylor" writes:

Michael Meissner wrote:
[]
No it is a Point & Shoot with Zoom.


Or a zlr, using the wacky new group names.


A ZLR is not just a point and shoot with zoom; perhaps better defined as
an SLR-like camera with no mirror and fixed lens. On a ZLR one would look
for:

- SLR-like format
- zoom
- full manual control of aperture, shutter speed and focus
- hot shoe


Well the C-2100UZ has all that, except for the hot-shoe (but the FL-CB04 cable
gives you a pc-sync connection so you can fire off external flashes).

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org
  #23  
Old November 29th 04, 08:41 AM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Browne wrote:
David J Taylor wrote:

I don't see that pushing a button or operating a wheel affects
whether you /can/ control these parameters or not.


It's not that you can control the parameters, but how easily it can
be done while shooting.

[]

That's not relevant to a defintion - if all these parameters /can/ be
manually controlled then the camera could qualify as ZLR rather than
point-and-shoot.

David


  #24  
Old November 29th 04, 08:46 AM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Browne wrote:
[]
It's not that you can control the parameters, but how easily it can
be done while shooting. I have two SLR's, a Maxxum 7xi and a Maxxum
9.
7xi: Changing between A-S and M modes; or setting exposure
compensation is a bit tedious (depress a button once or twice, then
turn a wheel to select).
On the Maxxum 9 I can do these without taking my eye from the
viewfinder and entirely by feel or by watching the exp. meter. Makes
shooting much less tedious to have these principal controls dedicated.


As a matter of interest, how do the popular D70 and 300D cameras compare?
I looked at the 300D review and saw neither an aperture ring nor a shutter
speed dial.

David


  #25  
Old November 29th 04, 11:40 AM
Graham Holden
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:46:30 -0000, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:
[]
It's not that you can control the parameters, but how easily it can
be done while shooting. I have two SLR's, a Maxxum 7xi and a Maxxum
9.
7xi: Changing between A-S and M modes; or setting exposure
compensation is a bit tedious (depress a button once or twice, then
turn a wheel to select).
On the Maxxum 9 I can do these without taking my eye from the
viewfinder and entirely by feel or by watching the exp. meter. Makes
shooting much less tedious to have these principal controls dedicated.


As a matter of interest, how do the popular D70 and 300D cameras compare?
I looked at the 300D review and saw neither an aperture ring nor a shutter
speed dial.

David


For the D70:

You change P/A/S/M mode by turning an "old-style" mode knob on the left of
the viewfinder; with practice, I'm sure you could adjust this by feel.

In these modes, two command-dials control one or both of shutter or
aperture. These are "thumbwheels" (or one thumb-, one fingerwheel) that
poke out front and back of the shutter release (i.e. the rear one is
roughly where the film advance lever would be. Visual feedback of what
you're doing is in the viewfinder, so you can adjust these easily without
taking your eye from the shot.

A few other settings (white balance/white balance adjust, ISO, exposure
adjust) can be changed by pressing a button and turning one of the wheels.
If you're a heavy user, you could probably get quite adept at changing
these without looking (though for some, I think you would need to remember
what the current setting was).

Regards,
Graham Holden (g-holden AT dircon DOT co DOT uk)
--
There are 10 types of people in the world;
those that understand binary and those that don't.
  #26  
Old November 29th 04, 03:47 PM
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David J Taylor wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:

David J Taylor wrote:


I don't see that pushing a button or operating a wheel affects
whether you /can/ control these parameters or not.


It's not that you can control the parameters, but how easily it can
be done while shooting.


[]

That's not relevant to a defintion - if all these parameters /can/ be
manually controlled then the camera could qualify as ZLR rather than
point-and-shoot.


I didn't mean the above in the sense of definition but in the sense of what
makes helps a camera be a photographic tool as opposed to a widget. Full access
to the controls that one needs as one is shooting is part of a competent tool.
There are SLRs, ZLRs and P+Ss that fail in this regard, remaining whatever they are.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
  #27  
Old November 29th 04, 05:00 PM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alan Browne wrote:
[]
I didn't mean the above in the sense of definition but in the sense
of what makes helps a camera be a photographic tool as opposed to a
widget. Full access to the controls that one needs as one is shooting is
part of a
competent tool. There are SLRs, ZLRs and P+Ss that fail in this
regard, remaining whatever they are.


Completely agree, but the OP wanted a definition of ZLR.

David


  #28  
Old November 30th 04, 06:04 AM
JC Dill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:46:30 -0000, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

As a matter of interest, how do the popular D70 and 300D cameras compare?
I looked at the 300D review and saw neither an aperture ring nor a shutter
speed dial.


The 300D has a wheel, in P, M and TV modes its default behavior is to
change the shutter speed. In M mode when you depress a button on the
back of the camera the wheel changes the aperture, otherwise it
changes the shutter speed. In AV mode the wheel changes the aperture
without you having to use the button on the back to "select" the
aperture as the thing that gets changed.

When you select ISO, the wheel changes the ISO, when you select white
balance then the wheel changes WB. For this reason, the wheel is
unlabeled (it changes many things, depending on what is selected
elsewhere).

HTH

jc - 300D user
  #29  
Old November 30th 04, 08:30 AM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JC Dill wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:46:30 -0000, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

As a matter of interest, how do the popular D70 and 300D cameras
compare? I looked at the 300D review and saw neither an aperture
ring nor a shutter speed dial.


The 300D has a wheel, in P, M and TV modes its default behavior is to
change the shutter speed. In M mode when you depress a button on the
back of the camera the wheel changes the aperture, otherwise it
changes the shutter speed. In AV mode the wheel changes the aperture
without you having to use the button on the back to "select" the
aperture as the thing that gets changed.

When you select ISO, the wheel changes the ISO, when you select white
balance then the wheel changes WB. For this reason, the wheel is
unlabeled (it changes many things, depending on what is selected
elsewhere).

HTH

jc - 300D user


Yes, it does, JC. Sounds rather like the cameras I've handled (which fall
into the ZLR category).

Thanks,
David


  #30  
Old November 30th 04, 06:57 PM
JC Dill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:30:13 -0000, "David J Taylor"
wrote:

Yes, it does, JC. Sounds rather like the cameras I've handled (which fall
into the ZLR category).


I am not familiar with the exact description of a ZLR camera, but it
appears that one feature that they all seem to have is a built-in
zoom, such as the Canon PowerShot Pro1 and my old Olympus E-100 RS. I
don't think that cameras that A) have a reflex mirror and B) take
interchangable lenses such as Canon's EOS series cameras fall into the
ZLR category, I think those are the cameras that the SLR category is
for.

But I could be wrong.

jc

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"telephoto" - another definition problem RolandRB Medium Format Photography Equipment 36 February 14th 05 01:25 PM
"telephoto" - another definition problem RolandRB Medium Format Photography Equipment 0 February 3rd 05 07:42 AM
Kodak Gold 100 vs Kodak Bright Sun vs Kodak High Definition Colour Film Graham Fountain 35mm Photo Equipment 9 October 5th 04 12:57 AM
documentary definition? main identity Film & Labs 0 April 8th 04 02:22 PM
Kodak's High Definition Film [email protected] APS Photographic Equipment 8 December 10th 03 03:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.