Rear Window 500/8 Mirror

On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 8:46:39 AM UTC-4, nospam wrote:
-hh wrote:


FWIW, some people have reportedly chosen alternative images which
are vastly less ... civilized.

which is by far the best solution.

I think it depends.

On the one hand, a "very rude" image certainly would get a reaction
out of a website's readership, but it IMO probably be that the
website was an "innocent victim" of a malicious hack, not that they
themselves had done anything wrong.

On the other hand, an "I'm sorry you're reading content from a thief"
makes it quite clear that the website was the guilty party.

there's a certain photo with goat in its name that works wonders.

Yes, that's the one that I was alluding to.


-hh

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:


Uploading isn't stealing .

it's distributing content that is not yours and for which you do not
have the rights to distribute it.

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

If you upload an image (that you don't own) to a site and you don't
distrubute it or let anyone else see it you can count it as a backup even if
it isn't your own.

wrong.

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

If you upload an image (that you don't own) to a site and you don't
distrubute it or let anyone else see it you can count it as a backup even
if it isn't your own.

wrong.

Prove it.

read the relevant laws.

The problem is you don't know it's been done.

that doesn't make it legal.

On 2018-05-23 12:38:59 +0000, -hh said:


https://photocopyrightlaw.com/can-embedding-hotlinking-or-inline-linking-constitute-copyright-infringement/



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inline...s_that_inline_

An interesting legal perspective, although I'd make a counterpoint
that it really should depend on just how the hotlinking was done.
IMO, its one thing if the hotlinked image had been dutifully attributed
to its copyright owner, but if it was misrepresented as belonging
to the one who did the hotlink, that's entirely a different story.

Hotlinking is allowed as the law is practiced in the EU and USA. Feel
free to thange them! :-))
--
teleportation kills

On 2018-05-23 12:51:19 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

Uploading isn't stealing .

In extenso then It sure is. Unless you have secured the rights to the
material. You're publicising something that you don't own for your own
purposes. Quotations are different
--
teleportation kills

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

When I back up tonight SDs image and lots of others are in my cache and some
are in my download folder and archive folders IT IS NOT illegal for me to
back them up to a HD or server, in fact for some here updating to servers is
done on a regular basis it is NOT illegal.

backups are not the same as uploading content.

On 23-May-18 1:46 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , David B.
wrote:

On 22-May-18 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Regardless of my CC by-nc-sa license, I would expect the courtesy to
advise
me of your intention to post that DB link on Facebook which I personally
never use.

I don't understand your license reference.

CC = Creative Commons

Thank you. I'm fairly sure that you've told me previously that I could
share you images if I wished.

somehow i doubt that.

once again, you're trying to weasel out of having stolen other people's
content.

I've stolen nothing. Savageduck still has his fantastic image of the
Cheetah. I'm now wishing that I *had* downloaded and kept a copy. My
loss, that's for sure. :-(

You just have to choose an appropriate cat.

https://www.cat-lovers-only.com/imag...on-litter-box-
375.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8chR33SzqK.jpg

I get "Sorry, there's no such page here"

that's because you're an idiot.

No, I'm not. Why do you lie so often?

--
David B.

In article , David B.
wrote:

On 22-May-18 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Regardless of my CC by-nc-sa license, I would expect the courtesy to
advise
me of your intention to post that DB link on Facebook which I personally
never use.

I don't understand your license reference.

CC = Creative Commons

Thank you. I'm fairly sure that you've told me previously that I could
share you images if I wished.

somehow i doubt that.

once again, you're trying to weasel out of having stolen other people's
content.

I've stolen nothing.

actually, you did. you stole his intellectual property and used it
without his permission.

Savageduck still has his fantastic image of the
Cheetah. I'm now wishing that I *had* downloaded and kept a copy. My
loss, that's for sure. :-(

digging yourself an even deeper hole.

You just have to choose an appropriate cat.

https://www.cat-lovers-only.com/imag...on-litter-box-
375.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8chR33SzqK.jpg

I get "Sorry, there's no such page here"

that's because you're an idiot.

No, I'm not.

true. you're dumber than an idiot.
you being an idiot would be an improvement.

Why do you lie so often?

i'm not lying. the link works and you are incredibly stupid.

On 23-May-18 6:14 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , David B.
wrote:

On 22-May-18 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Regardless of my CC by-nc-sa license, I would expect the courtesy to
advise
me of your intention to post that DB link on Facebook which I personally
never use.

I don't understand your license reference.

CC = Creative Commons

Thank you. I'm fairly sure that you've told me previously that I could
share you images if I wished.

somehow i doubt that.

once again, you're trying to weasel out of having stolen other people's
content.

I've stolen nothing.

actually, you did. you stole his intellectual property and used it
without his permission.

I stole NOTHING. I posted a link, nothing more.

Savageduck still has his fantastic image of the
Cheetah. I'm now wishing that I *had* downloaded and kept a copy. My
loss, that's for sure. :-(

digging yourself an even deeper hole.

You just have to choose an appropriate cat.

https://www.cat-lovers-only.com/imag...on-litter-box-
375.jpg.pagespeed.ic.8chR33SzqK.jpg

I get "Sorry, there's no such page here"

that's because you're an idiot.

No, I'm not.

true. you're dumber than an idiot.
you being an idiot would be an improvement.

I forgive your rudeness. It simply demonstrates your ignorance.

Why do you lie so often?

i'm not lying. the link works and you are incredibly stupid.

This link works .... now:-

https://www.cat-lovers-only.com/imag...8chR33SzqK.jpg

It did NOT work this morning.

--
David B.