If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA spent $58 million on its Mars drone. Now it went haywire.
On 2021-05-30 00:08, RichA wrote:
I'm wondering what DJI would have charged to build NASA an equivalent drone? Actually it was very well designed with a wide stability margin. ***** Another design decision also played a role in helping Ingenuity land safely. As I’ve written about before, we stop using navigation camera images during the final phase of the descent to landing to ensure smooth and continuous estimates of the helicopter motion during this critical phase. That design decision also paid off during Flight Six: Ingenuity ignored the camera images in the final moments of flight, stopped oscillating, leveled its attitude, and touched down at the speed as designed. Looking at the bigger picture, Flight Six ended with Ingenuity safely on the ground because a number of subsystems – the rotor system, the actuators, and the power system – responded to increased demands to keep the helicopter flying. In a very real sense, Ingenuity muscled through the situation, and while the flight uncovered a timing vulnerability that will now have to be addressed, it also confirmed the robustness of the system in multiple ways. While we did not intentionally plan such a stressful flight, NASA now has flight data probing the outer reaches of the helicopter’s performance envelope. That data will be carefully analyzed in the time ahead, expanding our reservoir of knowledge about flying helicopters on Mars.[1] ***** Further, Ingenuity was designed to research how hard it is to fly on Mars. What they've learned so far will inform future designs and make them better. Not sure if DJI would be interested, though the publicity for success would be useful. DJI drones are highly reliant on GPS for navigation. There is no GPS constellation around the moon.[2] It's also a Chinese company and the US and China are not very space cooperative (The USA never wanted China to be part of the ISS, for example). __________________________________________________ _____________________ [1] https://mars.nasa.gov/technology/hel...-sixth-flight/ [2] There are proposals for such as well as a proposal to use the 'leakage'[3] from earth GPS/Galileo/GLONASS signals for nav on Mars. It would only cover part of the planet at a time (obviously) and would probably not be available during opposition for some time (days). Accuracy would be on the order of 100m. [3] by leakage, that part of the signal that misses the earth and radiates towards Mars. -- "...there are many humorous things in this world; among them the white man's notion that he is less savage than the other savages." -Samuel Clemens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA spent $58 million on its Mars drone. Now it went haywire. | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 1 | May 30th 21 06:43 PM |
Photographer cited, had drone confiscated for documenting Hart Island mass burials with his drone | Alfred Molon[_4_] | Digital Photography | 19 | April 21st 20 06:59 PM |
NASA's Mars probe: NO cmos, NO Bayer | Voodoo Thunder Pig | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | June 29th 08 07:22 AM |
"Your money is better spent on an SLR". Is it? | David J Taylor | Digital Photography | 45 | December 11th 04 04:01 PM |
Best Spent $600??? | Tom C. | Digital Photography | 20 | August 9th 04 05:28 AM |