If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 1/24/2017 1:07 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. Just how long have I been working with Photoshop? -- PeterN |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 1/24/2017 2:13 PM, nospam wrote:
In article 2017012410344138165-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, And you know I never did. so the first opportunity he could have used photoshop would have been when it went cross-platform in 1992 with version 2.5, about 3 years after i first started using it. 1992 is well before the digital photography revolution, so it's likely that he did not start using photoshop until much later. i still have photoshop 2.0 on an old mac from that era, which worked the last time i tried. To make a declaration that you have worked with Photoshop for much longer than an individual whose usage history you have absolutly no knowledge, is to put it mildly, Trumpian. Perhaps you are drawing from an alternate fact set. perhaps i'm drawing from what actually happened. -- PeterN |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
In article , PeterN
wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, And you know I never did. occasionally using a mac does not count. i was using photoshop since 1989. you were not. and as for plug-ins, i first started writing them in the late 1990s with the bulk of it in the mid-2000s. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. So you claim. yes i do, and calling me a liar shows just how desperate you are to bash and argue. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 2017-01-24 19:13:34 +0000, nospam said:
In article 2017012410344138165-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, so the first opportunity he could have used photoshop would have been when it went cross-platform in 1992 with version 2.5, about 3 years after i first started using it. 1992 is well before the digital photography revolution, so it's likely that he did not start using photoshop until much later. i still have photoshop 2.0 on an old mac from that era, which worked the last time i tried. OK! That is logical and actually makes sense. My first exposure to Photoshop was around 1994 as that was when I got my first Mac. Up until then I was quite happy with my Apple ][e with DuoDrives and of all things, a Gibson Light Pen to play with. To make a declaration that you have worked with Photoshop for much longer than an individual whose usage history you have absolutly no knowledge, is to put it mildly, Trumpian. Perhaps you are drawing from an alternate fact set. perhaps i'm drawing from what actually happened. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 1/24/2017 2:13 PM, nospam wrote:
In article 2017012410344138165-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, so the first opportunity he could have used photoshop would have been when it went cross-platform in 1992 with version 2.5, about 3 years after i first started using it. 1992 is well before the digital photography revolution, so it's likely that he did not start using photoshop until much later. i still have photoshop 2.0 on an old mac from that era, which worked the last time i tried. To make a declaration that you have worked with Photoshop for much longer than an individual whose usage history you have absolutly no knowledge, is to put it mildly, Trumpian. Perhaps you are drawing from an alternate fact set. perhaps i'm drawing from what actually happened. According to that logic you nobody has more experience using PS than you. Sure we believe that. You said so, it must be true. -- PeterN |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
In article , PeterN
wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, so the first opportunity he could have used photoshop would have been when it went cross-platform in 1992 with version 2.5, about 3 years after i first started using it. 1992 is well before the digital photography revolution, so it's likely that he did not start using photoshop until much later. i still have photoshop 2.0 on an old mac from that era, which worked the last time i tried. To make a declaration that you have worked with Photoshop for much longer than an individual whose usage history you have absolutly no knowledge, is to put it mildly, Trumpian. Perhaps you are drawing from an alternate fact set. perhaps i'm drawing from what actually happened. According to that logic you nobody has more experience using PS than you. Sure we believe that. You said so, it must be true. i never said any such thing. stop lying. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 1/24/2017 2:31 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Tony Cooper wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. So you claim. yes i do, and calling me a liar shows just how desperate you are to bash and argue. According to you asking for proof, is calling you a liar. Meanwhile, you do not even tell us which plugins you claim to have written. Not even what the plugin does. Now just what conclusion should we draw. -- PeterN |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
On 1/24/2017 2:49 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: From a technical standpoint anything a plugin does can be done from within PS. not true. If you actually worked with the product you would know what I am talking about. OK I will revise to say the "majority of things" i've worked with photoshop for much longer than you have and have also written several photoshop plug-ins, so i'm quite confident i know far more about what can and cannot be done with a plug-in. As a matter of curiosity, just when did you start working with photoshop? in late 1989, when photoshop was still beta. it came with a hardware key. the company i was at had only one key. we shared, although it was really just myself and one or two others. photoshop version 1.0 was released in feb 1990, mac only. peter doesn't use a mac, so the first opportunity he could have used photoshop would have been when it went cross-platform in 1992 with version 2.5, about 3 years after i first started using it. 1992 is well before the digital photography revolution, so it's likely that he did not start using photoshop until much later. i still have photoshop 2.0 on an old mac from that era, which worked the last time i tried. To make a declaration that you have worked with Photoshop for much longer than an individual whose usage history you have absolutly no knowledge, is to put it mildly, Trumpian. Perhaps you are drawing from an alternate fact set. perhaps i'm drawing from what actually happened. According to that logic you nobody has more experience using PS than you. Sure we believe that. You said so, it must be true. i never said any such thing. stop lying. Do learn logic. OTOH, I really don't care what you learn. You have proven to be a blowhard. -- PeterN |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion
That confirms I'm not the only one that uses "what is needed to be
done, only when needed. The less, the better". Knowledge is power: if you know which kind of effect you want to do, and you know which plugin does the job, you're green. Personally, if I need some effect, I'll search the optimal plugin for it and nothing else, this results in a libray of things I know what they do. No need to load all the Nik when I only use Dfine. -- andrea - ri mi cci, name |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photo editing software for editing lotsa pics | Bob Haar | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | December 17th 08 10:25 PM |
Photo editing software for editing lotsa pics | Eric Stevens | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 15th 08 09:47 AM |
Photo editing software for editing lotsa pics | nospam | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | December 15th 08 03:14 AM |
my photo-homepage - your opinion? | Michael Damb?ck | Digital Photography | 0 | February 10th 05 01:24 PM |
what is your honest opinion of this photo? | Ron Hunter | Digital Photography | 0 | February 6th 05 02:43 AM |