If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
"Uranium Committee" wrote in message om... (Paul Butzi) wrote in message . com... Paul: What is the title of this thread? When you have understood that, then and ONLY then, respond. Hey, why don't you do The Right Thing and collect your thoughts into some kind of manifesto. It might be a good exercise for you. I can already tell that you have facist tendencies. Don't get all bent out of shape. There are virtues even in that regard, albeit none that are worth a damn in politics. I'll send you a name and nudge or two of the esthecic facist movement if it helps.BUT you ain't going nowhere with such metrics except to Wally Land (Walmart Esthetics). Enjoy. |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
"Uranium Committee" wrote in message om... (Paul Butzi) wrote in message . com... Paul: What is the title of this thread? When you have understood that, then and ONLY then, respond. Hey, why don't you do The Right Thing and collect your thoughts into some kind of manifesto. It might be a good exercise for you. I can already tell that you have facist tendencies. Don't get all bent out of shape. There are virtues even in that regard, albeit none that are worth a damn in politics. I'll send you a name and nudge or two of the esthecic facist movement if it helps.BUT you ain't going nowhere with such metrics except to Wally Land (Walmart Esthetics). Enjoy. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Uranium Committee wrote:
YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Another Scarpitti flip-flop; on September 4 2003, Mike Scarpitti proudly proclaimed "Waffle Boy" to be a Work Of Art. (See below reprinted from Google.) Scarpitti thrives on self-generated controversy, and is very well likely to eventually reverse himself, should the reversal generate more attention. From: Michael Scarpitti ) Subject: Variable contrast Fiber Based paper? Newsgroups: rec.photo.darkroom Date: 2003-09-04 06:34:20 PST [..] I think the black youth pouring syrup is 'a work of art' [...] The hat, lighting, and his shirt and dark skin are fascinating, at least to me. It's more than a snapshot. |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Uranium Committee wrote:
YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Another Scarpitti flip-flop; on September 4 2003, Mike Scarpitti proudly proclaimed "Waffle Boy" to be a Work Of Art. (See below reprinted from Google.) Scarpitti thrives on self-generated controversy, and is very well likely to eventually reverse himself, should the reversal generate more attention. From: Michael Scarpitti ) Subject: Variable contrast Fiber Based paper? Newsgroups: rec.photo.darkroom Date: 2003-09-04 06:34:20 PST [..] I think the black youth pouring syrup is 'a work of art' [...] The hat, lighting, and his shirt and dark skin are fascinating, at least to me. It's more than a snapshot. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
Uranium Committee wrote:
YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Another Scarpitti flip-flop; on September 4 2003, Mike Scarpitti proudly proclaimed "Waffle Boy" to be a Work Of Art. (See below reprinted from Google.) Scarpitti thrives on self-generated controversy, and is very well likely to eventually reverse himself, should the reversal generate more attention. From: Michael Scarpitti ) Subject: Variable contrast Fiber Based paper? Newsgroups: rec.photo.darkroom Date: 2003-09-04 06:34:20 PST [..] I think the black youth pouring syrup is 'a work of art' [...] The hat, lighting, and his shirt and dark skin are fascinating, at least to me. It's more than a snapshot. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Sep 2004 10:09:49 -0700, (Paul Butzi) wrote:
Why do the other? Because, as an artist, YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Thanks for confirming and reinforcing what I had suspected - there is no point in attempting to discuss anything with someone who calls me a Nazi. You needed confirmation ? Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Sep 2004 10:09:49 -0700, (Paul Butzi) wrote:
Why do the other? Because, as an artist, YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Thanks for confirming and reinforcing what I had suspected - there is no point in attempting to discuss anything with someone who calls me a Nazi. You needed confirmation ? Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Don't do it,... just walk away,... do not start
another "what is art thread" ;-) (Repeat) Resist. In article , "jjs" wrote: Uranium Committee wrote: YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! More evidence that MS is searching for a religious creed. Pity. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
(Uranium Committee) wrote in message
There is no 'correct' tonal distribution for all images, only a 'correct' distribution for each image - the one which best meets the intent of the artist. Photography is not 'art' and cannot be art. Fine. I disagree. But, if you prefer, I will happily amend the statement to read "There is no 'correct' tonal distribution for all images, only a 'correct' distribution for each image - the one which best meets the intent of the photographer." Why do the other? Because, as an artist, YOU ARE NOT AN ARTIST! PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ART AND CANNOT BE ART! Thanks for confirming and reinforcing what I had suspected - there is no point in attempting to discuss anything with someone who calls me a Nazi. -Paul www.butzi.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 30 | September 12th 04 04:46 AM |
Removing 35mm mask on Durst M606? | Luigi de Guzman | In The Darkroom | 4 | March 1st 04 04:09 AM |
split grade printing - can it be done with only G5 +G0 filters? | Jules Flynn | In The Darkroom | 3 | February 7th 04 04:46 AM |
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner | bleanne | APS Photographic Equipment | 1 | November 27th 03 07:34 AM |
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner | bleanne | Other Photographic Equipment | 1 | November 27th 03 07:34 AM |