If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera.
My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
Depends on the lens. Bear in mind that the greater depth of field because of
the smaller than film sensor makes it almost moot if you are out of doors. "Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
"Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
"Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
"Marvin Margoshes" wrote in message ... "Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. Use the "sports" scene mode. With most cameras that allows the autofocus to lock on to a moving subject. (sorry if this has already been suggested... I haven't caught up on this group in a while.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Marvin Margoshes" wrote in message ... "Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. Use the "sports" scene mode. With most cameras that allows the autofocus to lock on to a moving subject. (sorry if this has already been suggested... I haven't caught up on this group in a while.) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:41:26 -0400, "skymuffins"
wrote: "Marvin Margoshes" wrote in message ... "Lazarus Long" wrote in message ... I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show You are right that the autofocus in a digicam doesn't work on a featureless field. It would certainly work to set the focus at infinity at an air show or a fireworks display. You had a good learning experience. The quick feedback with a digicam is going to help you to learn more. Use the "sports" scene mode. With most cameras that allows the autofocus to lock on to a moving subject. (sorry if this has already been suggested... I haven't caught up on this group in a while.) Good suggestions - sports mode or simply infinite focus. I've also thought about the cameras "landscape mode" too. But my basic question still stands - how close is "infinite focus"? I know aperture plays a role in apparent sharpness, but focus is focus. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
In article , Lazarus Long
writes I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? The cute answer is that "infinity focus" is focussed on things infinitely far away. The helpful answer - though it may not seem like it - is this. When your camera is focussed at infinity, objects considerably closer than this will appear to be sharp. (This is because the amount of "fuzziness" - the diameter of the circle of confusion - is too small to be seen). The bad news is that the limit (i.e. how close they get and still appear sharp) depends on the aperture of your camera lens, and its focal length; it also varies according to what you propose to do with the picture (small web picture to huge enlargement - they have different demands on sharpness). This zone for which objects appear sharp is known as depth of field (DoF). With 35mm film cameras, it is easy to find tables (in books, on the web etc) which will tell you DoF details for any common focal length. For example, my 50mm f/1.4 lens shows that at f/22 I might expect everything from 3m to infinity to be in focus at the infinity setting. With lenses of longer focal length, the DoF for any lens aperture gets very much smaller; conversely, for wide angle lenses, it is larger. Thus if you take a portrait with a long lens at wide aperture, DoF is so small it is often impossible to get both eyes in sharp focus unless the subject is dead square to the camera. OTOH, if you use a very wide lens for a landscape at f/16, you can often get everything from a rock 1m away to the distant mountains in sharp focus. There is a slightly better way than setting the camera focus at infinity, and that is to set it (in my above example with the 50mm f/1.4 lens) to focus at 3m, then everything from about 1.5 m to infinity should be sharp. This setting is called the "hyperfocal distance". For any lens, at any particular aperture, there is such a setting which gives you maximum DoF, from about half the hyperfocal distance to infinity. Unfortunately, because these numbers are different for every focal length of lens and every aperture, I can't tell you what they are. You will have to do some research yourself, either to work it out (the maths is not that difficult) or to find a suitable table. One cautionary word: whilst you may be used to seeing the focal lengths of the lenses of digital compacts being quoted as "35mm equivalent" numbers - e.g. 35 - 135 or 28 - 80mm - these are a complete trap for this purpose. You will have to use the actual focal length of the lens, and the real sensor size, to do the maths. In the end, it may be easier to find the answer empirically. Even if you calculate or find a figure, you still have to test it - it will vary, as I said above, with the use to which you will put the pictures. So, set the camera to manual, find some regularly spaced objects (lamp posts or telegraph posts spring to mind) and get to it. You will find a setting which will work well for your purpose. I'd guess 20m at f/8 will be fine - but please come back and tell us yea or nay. At least (being digital) it will be quick and cost nothing except your time. BTW - I don't want to rain on your parade, but I would imagine that digital compacts are about the worst possible type of camera for air displays. The shutter lag would make it impossible to catch the critical moment and the focal length at the longest end inadequate for any but a large formation. If you can't afford a DSLR, a film SLR (with a zoom up to at least 300mm) would give much better results at reasonable price. David -- David Littlewood |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
how close is infinite focus?
In article , Lazarus Long
writes I'm a relative newbie to most of the features of a "modern" camera. My question is about focusing - how close, is infinite focus. My camera is a Coolpix 5400. 20 feet? 30 feet? I was at an air show this past weekend. With my film camera I would have simply twisted the lens to the infinite focus and left it there. However, with this new digital autofocus, I let the camera pick the focus. Well, for a lot of the shots of the planes overhead, they're not that well focused. I wrongly thought the camera would automatically go to infinite focus. So after looking around a bit (including the manual) I note that AF systems are confused by relatively featureless backgrounds (sky). So if I had manually set infinite focus, how close to the camera would something appear to be in focus? The cute answer is that "infinity focus" is focussed on things infinitely far away. The helpful answer - though it may not seem like it - is this. When your camera is focussed at infinity, objects considerably closer than this will appear to be sharp. (This is because the amount of "fuzziness" - the diameter of the circle of confusion - is too small to be seen). The bad news is that the limit (i.e. how close they get and still appear sharp) depends on the aperture of your camera lens, and its focal length; it also varies according to what you propose to do with the picture (small web picture to huge enlargement - they have different demands on sharpness). This zone for which objects appear sharp is known as depth of field (DoF). With 35mm film cameras, it is easy to find tables (in books, on the web etc) which will tell you DoF details for any common focal length. For example, my 50mm f/1.4 lens shows that at f/22 I might expect everything from 3m to infinity to be in focus at the infinity setting. With lenses of longer focal length, the DoF for any lens aperture gets very much smaller; conversely, for wide angle lenses, it is larger. Thus if you take a portrait with a long lens at wide aperture, DoF is so small it is often impossible to get both eyes in sharp focus unless the subject is dead square to the camera. OTOH, if you use a very wide lens for a landscape at f/16, you can often get everything from a rock 1m away to the distant mountains in sharp focus. There is a slightly better way than setting the camera focus at infinity, and that is to set it (in my above example with the 50mm f/1.4 lens) to focus at 3m, then everything from about 1.5 m to infinity should be sharp. This setting is called the "hyperfocal distance". For any lens, at any particular aperture, there is such a setting which gives you maximum DoF, from about half the hyperfocal distance to infinity. Unfortunately, because these numbers are different for every focal length of lens and every aperture, I can't tell you what they are. You will have to do some research yourself, either to work it out (the maths is not that difficult) or to find a suitable table. One cautionary word: whilst you may be used to seeing the focal lengths of the lenses of digital compacts being quoted as "35mm equivalent" numbers - e.g. 35 - 135 or 28 - 80mm - these are a complete trap for this purpose. You will have to use the actual focal length of the lens, and the real sensor size, to do the maths. In the end, it may be easier to find the answer empirically. Even if you calculate or find a figure, you still have to test it - it will vary, as I said above, with the use to which you will put the pictures. So, set the camera to manual, find some regularly spaced objects (lamp posts or telegraph posts spring to mind) and get to it. You will find a setting which will work well for your purpose. I'd guess 20m at f/8 will be fine - but please come back and tell us yea or nay. At least (being digital) it will be quick and cost nothing except your time. BTW - I don't want to rain on your parade, but I would imagine that digital compacts are about the worst possible type of camera for air displays. The shutter lag would make it impossible to catch the critical moment and the focal length at the longest end inadequate for any but a large formation. If you can't afford a DSLR, a film SLR (with a zoom up to at least 300mm) would give much better results at reasonable price. David -- David Littlewood |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yashicamat focus shift problem | sreenath | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | July 27th 04 06:18 AM |
macro or close up filters? | Joseph Meehan | Digital Photography | 11 | July 22nd 04 07:42 PM |
Canon "known issue" with DOF ? | Scott | 35mm Photo Equipment | 20 | July 15th 04 07:53 PM |
Focus trouble | Luc Brentener | Digital Photography | 2 | July 13th 04 05:20 AM |
Rollei 6x6 projector focus | [email protected] | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | December 1st 03 11:27 PM |