Lightroom vs. Apertu Curves

In article , PAS wrote:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a binary
to text encoding method.


--
Sandman[.net]

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

In article , PAS
wrote:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a
binary
to text encoding method.

I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for
Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case.

On 2014-08-21 12:56:56 +0000, "PAS" said:

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2014-08-20 19:48:33 +0000, "PAS" said:


"John Turco" wrote in message
...
On 8/13/2014 8:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-08-13 13:03:09 +0000, Sandman said:

heavily edited for brevity

Which begs the question

I thought we had covered the "begs the question" ? "raises the
question'
issue"
http://begthequestion.info

edited

What does "?" mean?

John

"Not equal to"

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

Good question with no good answers. I'm using Outlook Express as a
newsreader and using plain text to send messages and using Uuencode for
replies.

Uuencode is the problem. Do you have an option to use Unicode (UTF8)?

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2014-08-21 12:59:43 +0000, "PAS" said:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

That answers my previous question. So it seems OE isn't a "real Usenet
client". ;-)

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014082107311524884-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-08-21 12:59:43 +0000, "PAS" said:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

That answers my previous question. So it seems OE isn't a "real Usenet
client". ;-)

Bored? ;-p
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

In article 2014082107292958999-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-08-21 12:56:56 +0000, "PAS" said:

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2014-08-20 19:48:33 +0000, "PAS" said:


"John Turco" wrote in message
...
On 8/13/2014 8:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-08-13 13:03:09 +0000, Sandman said:

heavily edited for brevity

Which begs the question

I thought we had covered the "begs the question" ? "raises the
question'
issue"
http://begthequestion.info

edited

What does "?" mean?

John

"Not equal to"

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

Good question with no good answers. I'm using Outlook Express as a
newsreader and using plain text to send messages and using Uuencode for
replies.

Uuencode is the problem. Do you have an option to use Unicode (UTF8)?

http://newsreaders.com/
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2014082107311524884-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2014-08-21 12:59:43 +0000, "PAS" said:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

That answers my previous question. So it seems OE isn't a "real Usenet
client". ;-)

I guess it isn't . I've tried multiple newsreaders as well as email
apps. I never cared for any other newsreader so I kept going back to
OE. For email, I keep going back to Outlook.

On 8/21/2014 10:31 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2014-08-21 12:59:43 +0000, "PAS" said:

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article 2014082014470137702-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

That answers my previous question. So it seems OE isn't a "real Usenet
client". ;-)


OE at least marke the same message as read, when it was cross posted. I
Haven't figgured out how to get Thunderbird to do that.


--
PeterN

In article 2014082107292958999-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

Good question with no good answers. I'm using Outlook Express as a
newsreader and using plain text to send messages and using Uuencode for
replies.

Uuencode is the problem. Do you have an option to use Unicode (UTF8)?

uuencode is not the same as unicode.

In article , PAS
wrote:

Correct, but, how did we get ± turned into a "?" in your response?
Are you perhaps not using Unicode for your replies?

that's how.

There is no setting in Outlook Express to use Unicode, it's Uuencode.

It's not comparable. Unicode is a character set, and UUencode is a
binary to text encoding method.

I never claimed they are compatible. I said there is no setting for
Unicode, it's Uuencode. That is still the case.

no it isn't the case at all. they are two entirely different things.

uuencode is a way to encode binary files (not individual characters)
into plain text for sending through email or usenet. it's long been
replaced by mime in email and yenc in usenet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uuencoding

As a complete file, the uuencoded output for a plain text file named
cat.txt containing only the characters Cat would be

begin 644 cat.txt
#0V%T
`
end

unicode is a character set that can handle just about any character in
any language.

the problem is that outlook doesn't use unicode and will show and/or
send the wrong characters. it's broken and incompatible with the rest
of the world. replace it.