PING: William Graham!

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04...


I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our
recent
history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it.

What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was
gutted
back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any
secret
organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under
Richard
Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a
list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for
them
to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from
that
point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a
CIA
if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know
where
the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives?
You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however,
blame
the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.)

Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked,
successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's
a total failure.

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04...


I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our
recent
history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it.

What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was
gutted
back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any
secret
organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under
Richard
Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a
list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for
them
to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from
that
point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a
CIA
if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know
where
the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives?
You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however,
blame
the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.)

Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked,
successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's
a total failure.

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:ZLBdd.505767$8_6.364591@attbi_s04...


I meant for the US. We've never suffered an attack like that in our
recent
history. Bush was asleep at the switch, and we paid for it.

What nonsense! What could Bush have done about 9/11, when the CIA was
gutted
back in the 70's and it became politically incorrect to maintain any
secret
organization whatsoever? I remember a presidential directive, (under
Richard
Nixon, I believe) that said from now on, the CIA would have to publish a
list of every cent they spent. This effectively made it impossible for
them
to maintain any operatives, or perform any clandestine operations from
that
point on. It effectively disbanded that organization....Of what use is a
CIA
if they can't carry on anything in secret? How can they possible know
where
the Al Queda is doing if they can't infiltrate them with their operatives?
You can't blame Bush, or even Clinton, for that......You can, however,
blame
the liberals. (and I do, brother, I do.)

Blame whoever you want, but the absolute fact is that we were attacked,
successfully, on Dumbya's watch. That makes it his fault. Deal with it. He's
a total failure.

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:OABdd.400632$mD.106439@attbi_s02...


BTW, the only time in history what you describe has ever happened is on
Dumbya's watch. maybe it's because he was on vacation for 42% of the time
during the months leading up to 9/11. Yes, he wasn't even on the job.

Perhaps not....But you can't say that Clinton, or the other recent
presidents before him, were either....I can't speak for past mistakes,
made
by past AH's. All I can do is revere the one guy who has finally seen the
light and is willing to put his money where his mouth is.....I will let
you
know more about that guy on November 3rd........

For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures
to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his
fault. He's s total screw up.

"William Graham" wrote in message
news:OABdd.400632$mD.106439@attbi_s02...


BTW, the only time in history what you describe has ever happened is on
Dumbya's watch. maybe it's because he was on vacation for 42% of the time
during the months leading up to 9/11. Yes, he wasn't even on the job.

Perhaps not....But you can't say that Clinton, or the other recent
presidents before him, were either....I can't speak for past mistakes,
made
by past AH's. All I can do is revere the one guy who has finally seen the
light and is willing to put his money where his mouth is.....I will let
you
know more about that guy on November 3rd........

For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures
to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his
fault. He's s total screw up.

From: "Böwzér"

For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures
to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his
fault. He's s total screw up.

Nobody thinks Bush is a total ****up more than I do, but even I don't blame him
for 9/11. I do blame him for his actions (and inactions) since then, however.
I also think it's despicable how he's wrapped himself in the 9/11 tragedy by
using it as a means of promoting himself.

From: "Böwzér"

For God's sakes, Bill, stop trying to shift blame for Bush's total failures
to others! We were successfully attacked on Bush's watch, that makes it his
fault. He's s total screw up.

Nobody thinks Bush is a total ****up more than I do, but even I don't blame him
for 9/11. I do blame him for his actions (and inactions) since then, however.
I also think it's despicable how he's wrapped himself in the 9/11 tragedy by
using it as a means of promoting himself.

"B=F6wz=E9r" wrote:
You'll never convince William. He told me, in another thread, that the =
US=20
should act as the world's police force. At that point, I left the=20
converstion, since all semblance of logic and intelligence flew out the=
=20
window. What little was left, anyway.

Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately?
I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants,
he would write about something photographic.

"B=F6wz=E9r" wrote:
You'll never convince William. He told me, in another thread, that the =
US=20
should act as the world's police force. At that point, I left the=20
converstion, since all semblance of logic and intelligence flew out the=
=20
window. What little was left, anyway.

Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately?
I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants,
he would write about something photographic.

Bill Tuthill wrote:

Has anybody seen a photography-related post by William Graham, lately?
I'd be happy if, just once in a while amid all his OT political rants,
he would write about something photographic.

Not me. 'Course, I haven't seen any of the rants either :-)