If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix)..And an photography idea atthe end of the my rant.
Bill Graham wrote: You must be a socialist. ... throw everything in a huge pot, and then divvy it up China has been in its current form for about a quart as long as the US and they seem to have enough left over to lend money to the US. Go figure. w.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix)..And an photography idea at the end of the my rant.
"Peter" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message ... "Peter" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message ... "Peter" wrote in message ... "Dr.Smith" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message news My father just turned 74 and is still working. He was able to retire back in the 80's, but after 6 months of fishing, hunting, and golfing, he could not stand not it anymore. He was born the son of a real blacksmith. He lived in Stanley, Oklahoma (now just a name on a map). He would wake up well before first light and do his chores mostly tending live stock. After his chores he would eat breakfast that was cooked on a wood stove. Breakfast consisted of fresh eggs (he had collected), a little meat from a smoke house, that his father and uncles kept, and milk from cows. After breakfast my father would have to catch the bus to school. The bus at that time only ran on the main highway,. My father would have to cross the Kiamichi River either by horse or by row boat, depending on the depth. He had 11 bothers and sisters. His father kept all the kids fed and sheltered, but died around 1943. My father as well as the older kids helped support the family with farm work, hunting, trapping and pulpwood cutting. This was back when Sears and Roebuck would send buyers around the country to buy animal skins for their clothing. After highschool he did get a senior trip....to Korea. Senior trips were riskier in those days, not because of lost luggage and scant cellphone coverage, but due to people trying to kill you. One of his older brothers (an uncle I will never know), I believe was killed while on 'vacation' in Europe during the first half of the 1940's. I could go on, but I only discuss my fathers teenage years so as to point out how much easier teenagers have it today. A teenagers life today is so damn easy, they have to create their own hardships (cyberbulling, druguse, teenage pregnancy, boredom, etc). The types of hardships my father faced were not actually that uncommon for many his age. I will admit that because of him, I had things easier, but to this day he and I have little patience for those who believe that they are owed healthcare, transportation, entertainment, food, shelter, money (or other resources), etc. just because they were born. This country can easily support the elderly, truly sick, mentally retarded, and those who really cannot support themselves, and as a first world nation we should, but we have far too many who are on the public dole simply because they can be. I often use the term "MIDNIGHT BASKETBALL", for all those who remember it, as a metaphor for all that is wrong with the 'NANNY STATE'. There is a foodbank on my way to work and I see too many cars with loud stereos worth more then the rest of the car, and oversize rims pulling in there. This has to end! As far as the $4000 dollar subsidy for getting trading a 'clunker' so that it could be crushed. First off I have three vehicles, one motorcycle bought new in 1998, one truck bought used in 2005, and one motorcycle bought used in 2007. I maintain all three, take care of them, and keep them road worthy. Why in the name of H)*ll am mine or anybody else's tax money going to help others buy new cars. Second, those 'clunkers' are what the working poor and just plain poor people buy to get them around for a couple of years till they reached a station in life that they could buy a new car. By reducing the number of used cars on the lots, the price is higher than what it would have been otherwise. Some who might have been able to just afford a used car now could not. Real, real smart (sarcasm). Supply and Demand. Sorry for the venting. BTW I have a Nikon D50 with many accessories. I may have to take some pictures of the BS I see and post them in a binaries/photography group. Hey lets all do that! Anything I have today I got by working for it. I am 73, still working part time, in the last 2 months I averaged 85 hours per week. I dislike the freeloaders too, perhaps even more than you do. I am in the fortunate position of working because I want to. (I only mention this to put my POV in perspective.) It is too easy to forget that for every person who plays the system there are at least 20 to 30 who are in genuine need. As a human being I cannot enjoy what I have Much of the cause is that it would cost more to do a 100% police job on everybody, than to let a few chiseling *******s slip through the cracks. We supposedly live in a civilized society. Part of the price we pay for civilization is a recognition of the moral obligation to help those in need. Part of this obligation is paid for in taxes. Other parts can be met by simple acts. I don't know you at all, but I wonder how much time you spent helping Katrina, victims, or other unfortunates. There was one individual I ran into a few times and each time he would plead hunger and ask for money. I would not give him money, but offered to buy him a sandwich. Turned out that this poor guy was simply very hungry and was quite grateful when I would buy him a sandwich or salad so he would have something decent to eat, for at least one meal. I was a reliable source for him every time I saw him and didn't think twice. It was just something I did. It's all too easy to pin labels as an excuse for not meeting our moral obligations. I suspect Bill Graham is not at all like his namesake. I don't know what you do in that sense, but hope you do your share. I don't pretend to be generous, nor do I give up all my luxuries. Too many do absolutely nothing. When I express outrage at the recently strongly suspected Goldman Sachs ripoff and the answer is that we should eliminate welfare and allow smoking anywhere, I strongly suspect less than noble motives. -- Peter I don't agree that, "For every person who cheats the system there are 30 or 30 in need" As a matter of fact, I saw a statistic that says less that 2% of the people on welfare have some disability, either physical or mental. This why I would like to cut all those deadbeats off and pay the ones who really have a need 50 times as much money as they are getting now. For starters, I would be still giving away the same money, but it would be going to a much better use. Share it with us. Might make for an interesting analysis. How does your "statistic" define disability? BTW how much money do you really "need." I do agree with you on one thing though. As my grandmother said. "rich or poor, its good to have money." And: "it's better to be rich than poor." Now please state whether rich only means lots of money. Or, does it mean that you can walk around with a sense of inner peace without consistent bitter feelings, because someone may be depriving you of the ability to have five magnums of a fine cognac on your shelf, instead of four. -- Peter I am only speaking of money.....My money. rant snipped How sad! -- Peter Well, if wanting my own money is sad, then lets see you eat nothing for a while.....I think that will change your mind. You must truly be a socialist. You want everyone to throw everything they own in a huge pot, and then divvy it up amongst themselves equally.....That will surely create a lot of incentives to work hard, and develop new products.......Thanks, but no thanks.....It's high time I bow out of your company.....You are a nut. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix)..And an photography idea at the end of the my rant.
"Bill Graham" wrote in message
... "Peter" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message ... "Peter" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message ... "Peter" wrote in message ... "Dr.Smith" wrote in message ... "Bill Graham" wrote in message news My father just turned 74 and is still working. He was able to retire back in the 80's, but after 6 months of fishing, hunting, and golfing, he could not stand not it anymore. He was born the son of a real blacksmith. He lived in Stanley, Oklahoma (now just a name on a map). He would wake up well before first light and do his chores mostly tending live stock. After his chores he would eat breakfast that was cooked on a wood stove. Breakfast consisted of fresh eggs (he had collected), a little meat from a smoke house, that his father and uncles kept, and milk from cows. After breakfast my father would have to catch the bus to school. The bus at that time only ran on the main highway,. My father would have to cross the Kiamichi River either by horse or by row boat, depending on the depth. He had 11 bothers and sisters. His father kept all the kids fed and sheltered, but died around 1943. My father as well as the older kids helped support the family with farm work, hunting, trapping and pulpwood cutting. This was back when Sears and Roebuck would send buyers around the country to buy animal skins for their clothing. After highschool he did get a senior trip....to Korea. Senior trips were riskier in those days, not because of lost luggage and scant cellphone coverage, but due to people trying to kill you. One of his older brothers (an uncle I will never know), I believe was killed while on 'vacation' in Europe during the first half of the 1940's. I could go on, but I only discuss my fathers teenage years so as to point out how much easier teenagers have it today. A teenagers life today is so damn easy, they have to create their own hardships (cyberbulling, druguse, teenage pregnancy, boredom, etc). The types of hardships my father faced were not actually that uncommon for many his age. I will admit that because of him, I had things easier, but to this day he and I have little patience for those who believe that they are owed healthcare, transportation, entertainment, food, shelter, money (or other resources), etc. just because they were born. This country can easily support the elderly, truly sick, mentally retarded, and those who really cannot support themselves, and as a first world nation we should, but we have far too many who are on the public dole simply because they can be. I often use the term "MIDNIGHT BASKETBALL", for all those who remember it, as a metaphor for all that is wrong with the 'NANNY STATE'. There is a foodbank on my way to work and I see too many cars with loud stereos worth more then the rest of the car, and oversize rims pulling in there. This has to end! As far as the $4000 dollar subsidy for getting trading a 'clunker' so that it could be crushed. First off I have three vehicles, one motorcycle bought new in 1998, one truck bought used in 2005, and one motorcycle bought used in 2007. I maintain all three, take care of them, and keep them road worthy. Why in the name of H)*ll am mine or anybody else's tax money going to help others buy new cars. Second, those 'clunkers' are what the working poor and just plain poor people buy to get them around for a couple of years till they reached a station in life that they could buy a new car. By reducing the number of used cars on the lots, the price is higher than what it would have been otherwise. Some who might have been able to just afford a used car now could not. Real, real smart (sarcasm). Supply and Demand. Sorry for the venting. BTW I have a Nikon D50 with many accessories. I may have to take some pictures of the BS I see and post them in a binaries/photography group. Hey lets all do that! Anything I have today I got by working for it. I am 73, still working part time, in the last 2 months I averaged 85 hours per week. I dislike the freeloaders too, perhaps even more than you do. I am in the fortunate position of working because I want to. (I only mention this to put my POV in perspective.) It is too easy to forget that for every person who plays the system there are at least 20 to 30 who are in genuine need. As a human being I cannot enjoy what I have Much of the cause is that it would cost more to do a 100% police job on everybody, than to let a few chiseling *******s slip through the cracks. We supposedly live in a civilized society. Part of the price we pay for civilization is a recognition of the moral obligation to help those in need. Part of this obligation is paid for in taxes. Other parts can be met by simple acts. I don't know you at all, but I wonder how much time you spent helping Katrina, victims, or other unfortunates. There was one individual I ran into a few times and each time he would plead hunger and ask for money. I would not give him money, but offered to buy him a sandwich. Turned out that this poor guy was simply very hungry and was quite grateful when I would buy him a sandwich or salad so he would have something decent to eat, for at least one meal. I was a reliable source for him every time I saw him and didn't think twice. It was just something I did. It's all too easy to pin labels as an excuse for not meeting our moral obligations. I suspect Bill Graham is not at all like his namesake. I don't know what you do in that sense, but hope you do your share. I don't pretend to be generous, nor do I give up all my luxuries. Too many do absolutely nothing. When I express outrage at the recently strongly suspected Goldman Sachs ripoff and the answer is that we should eliminate welfare and allow smoking anywhere, I strongly suspect less than noble motives. -- Peter I don't agree that, "For every person who cheats the system there are 30 or 30 in need" As a matter of fact, I saw a statistic that says less that 2% of the people on welfare have some disability, either physical or mental. This why I would like to cut all those deadbeats off and pay the ones who really have a need 50 times as much money as they are getting now. For starters, I would be still giving away the same money, but it would be going to a much better use. Share it with us. Might make for an interesting analysis. How does your "statistic" define disability? BTW how much money do you really "need." I do agree with you on one thing though. As my grandmother said. "rich or poor, its good to have money." And: "it's better to be rich than poor." Now please state whether rich only means lots of money. Or, does it mean that you can walk around with a sense of inner peace without consistent bitter feelings, because someone may be depriving you of the ability to have five magnums of a fine cognac on your shelf, instead of four. -- Peter I am only speaking of money.....My money. rant snipped How sad! -- Peter Well, if wanting my own money is sad, then lets see you eat nothing for a while.....I think that will change your mind. You must truly be a socialist. You want everyone to throw everything they own in a huge pot, and then divvy it up amongst themselves equally.....That will surely create a lot of incentives to work hard, and develop new products.......Thanks, but no thanks.....It's high time I bow out of your company.....You are a nut. I am devastated. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix) | Neil Harrington[_4_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | April 16th 10 04:48 PM |
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix) | Bill Graham | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | April 16th 10 06:59 AM |
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix) | Bill Graham | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | April 16th 10 01:37 AM |
a portrait - Ellen DeGeneres (link fix) | Albert Ross | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | April 15th 10 06:53 PM |