If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon 35mm SLR: manual focus vs. auto focus
Dear Gurus,
Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! SS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A MF body has a nicer focusing screen for MF work and the MF lenses turn
more and with additional resistance. By nicer I am referring to the microprisim screens vs what is basically ground glass for the AF bodies. These features are desirable if you are into MF. If you do not need the speed, MF is more accurate than AF. You can carefully pick the exact point of focus where as the AF systems seem to get the focus point some where inside of the DOF and go with it. The Nikon MF bodies are compact and stoutly built. If you are into fast action shooting, the AF bodies and lenses are great. But if you are more into things shot from a tripod the MF system holds some advantages. I am sure that is why Nikon still makes MF bodies. Not all of us are sports photo journalists. As far as the MF lens speed being faster, f stop is independent of the focusing method. Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... S. S. wrote: Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A MF body has a nicer focusing screen for MF work and the MF lenses turn
more and with additional resistance. By nicer I am referring to the microprisim screens vs what is basically ground glass for the AF bodies. These features are desirable if you are into MF. If you do not need the speed, MF is more accurate than AF. You can carefully pick the exact point of focus where as the AF systems seem to get the focus point some where inside of the DOF and go with it. The Nikon MF bodies are compact and stoutly built. If you are into fast action shooting, the AF bodies and lenses are great. But if you are more into things shot from a tripod the MF system holds some advantages. I am sure that is why Nikon still makes MF bodies. Not all of us are sports photo journalists. As far as the MF lens speed being faster, f stop is independent of the focusing method. Perhaps if you were to mention what bodies/lenses you are considering... S. S. wrote: Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the MF will be the heavier given similar models. They tend to be
old designs with mechanical linkages and metal bodies. The only advantage to them is that some equipment snobs will tell you that you'll learn more about photography from them - they are wrong, and in fact actually don't have the vaguest idea how wrong they are, but that's the way they are, and no amount of evidence is gonna change them. Go for AF - and take a look at Canon and Pentax while you're at it. Nikon has been running on empty for a while now. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "S. S." wrote in message om... Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! SS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the MF will be the heavier given similar models. They tend to be
old designs with mechanical linkages and metal bodies. The only advantage to them is that some equipment snobs will tell you that you'll learn more about photography from them - they are wrong, and in fact actually don't have the vaguest idea how wrong they are, but that's the way they are, and no amount of evidence is gonna change them. Go for AF - and take a look at Canon and Pentax while you're at it. Nikon has been running on empty for a while now. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "S. S." wrote in message om... Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! SS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Actually the MF will be the heavier given similar models. They tend to be
old designs with mechanical linkages and metal bodies. The only advantage to them is that some equipment snobs will tell you that you'll learn more about photography from them - they are wrong, and in fact actually don't have the vaguest idea how wrong they are, but that's the way they are, and no amount of evidence is gonna change them. Go for AF - and take a look at Canon and Pentax while you're at it. Nikon has been running on empty for a while now. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "S. S." wrote in message om... Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! SS |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
S. S. wrote:
Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! This was recently discussed here. http://tinyurl.com/5d9hw -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
S. S. wrote:
Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! This was recently discussed here. http://tinyurl.com/5d9hw -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
S. S. wrote:
Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, and the MF lense speed is faster. But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! This was recently discussed here. http://tinyurl.com/5d9hw -- -- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource: -- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.-- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"S. S." wrote in message
om... Dear Gurus, Since an AF Nikon 35mm SLR will also have the capacity to do manual focus, I am wondering what is the advantage in general of an MF Nikon over an AF Nikon. I understand that an AF one probably will be bulkier and heavier than an MF one, Not true- many budget AF Nikons are lighter than many MF Nikons, the N/F55 and N/F75 in particular. and the MF lense speed is faster. Not necessarily true- while there have been faster 35mm and 50mm (and marginally faster 105mm and 135mm) lenses for MF Nikon, AF lenses are mostly just as fast (and the 28mm f1.4 is available only in AF) But in addition to those, what are the benefits, image quality-wise, of an MF Nikon? Are MF feature of an AF body the same as MF feature of an MF body? Thanks in advance for help! Image quality? No real improvement, although certain Nikon legends were never brought over to AF (and some, such as the 180mm, were apparently improved on). The benefits of a Nikon manual focus camera are mostly ergonomic- to those with a more patient approach, twiddling dials and knobs can be far more satisfying than assuming that once the button is pressed everything will just whirr into place. If you prefer to focus manually, an autofocus lens in MF mode will feel somewhat loose and unpleasant. If I may use an analogy (as I am known to), the manual/automatic issue is something like climbing a mountain versus taking the chairlift- you get the same result, and the view is still nice, and you can even spend the ride marvelling at the technology that is getting you there so easily- but when you get to the bottom again, it's easy to feel like you haven't actually done anything. OTT maybe, but a lot of people feel this way. -- Martin Francis http://www.sixbysix.co.uk "Go not to Usenet for counsel, for it will say both no, and yes, and no, and yes...." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need Nikon FG Instruction Manual | Amit Joneja | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | August 6th 04 01:39 PM |
Nikon D70 (and my 35mm Nikon equipment) | Matt Clara | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | July 2nd 04 11:58 AM |
What's the "leica look"? | TP | 35mm Photo Equipment | 68 | June 24th 04 05:05 PM |
Nikon SF-200 Auto slide feeder (like new) for sale | Ronald Shu | Photographing Nature | 0 | January 31st 04 07:46 PM |
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner | bleanne | APS Photographic Equipment | 1 | November 27th 03 07:34 AM |