If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said:
Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2013021310052035001-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg -- Yep. Looks good. That's what I would've attempted had I had photoshop. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said:
On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ....but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ....and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg -- Regards, Savageduck |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:34:48 -0800, Savageduck
wrote: On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said: On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ...but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ...and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg Nope. I can see the masking. :-( -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2013021321344871490-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said: On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ...but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ...and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg Nice. I wish I had my photoshop back - I'm using a loaner computer that has such few RAM it is impossible at the moment, but I hope to have it again before long. Thanks for playing with this and your comments. Tim |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On 2013-02-13 23:48:13 -0800, Eric Stevens said:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:34:48 -0800, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said: On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ...but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ...and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg Nope. I can see the masking. :-( What do you mean nope? Where did I say that was perfect? It was just a down & dirty sloppy job. If I was serious I would probably have taken much more care. I had no reason to. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On 2013-02-14 00:23:24 -0800, "Tim Conway" said:
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2013021321344871490-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said: On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ...but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ...and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg Nice. I wish I had my photoshop back - I'm using a loaner computer that has such few RAM it is impossible at the moment, but I hope to have it again before long. Thanks for playing with this and your comments. Tim I hope you get your digital darkroom back together soon. It is just fun to play with the tools we have available now. Thanks for that opportunity. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Steeples - Cooper's Comments
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:25:52 -0800, Savageduck
wrote: On 2013-02-13 23:48:13 -0800, Eric Stevens said: On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:34:48 -0800, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 17:47:33 -0800, Rob said: On 14/02/2013 5:05 AM, Savageduck wrote: On 2013-02-13 09:23:57 -0800, "Tim Conway" said: Tim Conway's views are all almost ruined by distracting elements of the wires and the television antenna. You're right. I'm photoshopless at the moment or I would've attempted to clone a lot of that stuff out. As always, thanks everyone for your comments - you're appreciated. Well here is a quick fix. ;-) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-1.jpg You could have selected the sky and rendered clouds. Naah! It was just a quick fix to get rid of the utility lines. ...but since you wanted sky + clouds, the quick fix is to add a background sky layer beneath the layer with the building. Add a layer mask to the building layer, and just paint in the new sky with black on the layer mask. Much quicker and easier than making a selection. So utility lines gone and new sky painted in. ...and here is that quick fix sky, not perfect, but good enough for this exercise. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Tim-QF-2.jpg Nope. I can see the masking. :-( What do you mean nope? Where did I say that was perfect? It was just a down & dirty sloppy job. If I was serious I would probably have taken much more care. I had no reason to. Maybe I misunderstood you. When you wrote "good enough for the exercise" I thought you meant [SI] but now I see that you meant something slightly different. I agrre, it was good enough to illustrate the point. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Pairs, etc - Cooper's Comments on in-house shots | PeterN | Digital Photography | 3 | July 23rd 12 11:57 PM |