If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount.
I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
I still have my adapter to use Hasselblad lenses on Nikon SLR.
I have now sold my Hasselblad equipment but I had the CFE 50, CFi 50, 120, 180. The lenses focuses opposite the Nikkors (so you have to turn opposite the indicater in the viewfinder) and the Hasselblad lenses are very large. You have to use stop down metering. You can get good results but in the long run I don't think you will use it. I could see no better performance over the Nikkors. The Hasselblad lenses also have very few apperture blades and do not use rounded blades either. The CFi 50 + adapter is very much to carry for a normal lens. An idea could be if you don't have a macro lens and then use the 120mm. If a SLR came out with a larger sensor the 24x36 then the adapter (or another because a larger mount may be necessary) could be very useful. Max "Alan Browne" skrev i en meddelelse ... I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Alan Browne wrote:
I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). Only problems are medium format lenses may not be as sharp and they become long telephoto lenses. The advantage is you can do tilt/shift. Shifting for perspective correction isn't very useful for a long lens and not all lenses hold up well tilted. You can easily test the concept by wrapping some black fabric around the mount as a makeshift bellows, the offset will be about an inch. Here's a 300mm f/4 lens with the focus mechanism and aperture removed so there's room to mount it on a bellows: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography/pg1pc4 This one is *not* sharp... perhaps a bad copy or just cheap design, but it's interesting and fun to play with. It probably produces a decent image stopped down. Here's a crazy home made tilt/shift mount for a respectable Russian 28mm fisheye: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography...-camera/pg1pc3 -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Max Perl wrote:
I still have my adapter to use Hasselblad lenses on Nikon SLR. I have now sold my Hasselblad equipment but I had the CFE 50, CFi 50, 120, 180. The lenses focuses opposite the Nikkors (so you have to turn opposite the indicater in the viewfinder) and the Hasselblad lenses are very large. You have to use stop down metering. You can get good results but in the long run I don't think you will use it. I could see no better performance over the Nikkors. The Hasselblad lenses also have very few apperture blades and do not use rounded blades either. The CFi 50 + adapter is very much to carry for a normal lens. An idea could be if you don't have a macro lens and then use the 120mm. If a SLR came out with a larger sensor the 24x36 then the adapter (or another because a larger mount may be necessary) could be very useful. Thanks. I don't have a wide-ish portrait lens (I'm considering the CZ 85 f/1.4) so I'd like to try my 80mm Hassy lens on the Sony a900. That might suffice (though I doubt it is as sharp as the 85mm f/1.4, and it's certainly not as fast). Also would like to try the 120 Makro on there. I'm not sure my 150 will be all that useful, however. Don't top post please. Max "Alan Browne" skrev i en meddelelse ... I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Paul Furman wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). Only problems are medium format lenses may not be as sharp and they become long telephoto lenses. The FL should be no different? eg: the adaptor puts the lens mount out at the same distance it would be if mounted on the 500 C/M. The image circle will be larger (potential mirror box reflection issues) but the FL should remain that of the lens. The advantage is you can do tilt/shift. Not with adaptor I'm looking at. Shifting for perspective correction isn't very useful for a long lens and not all lenses hold up well tilted. You can easily test the concept by wrapping some black fabric around the mount as a makeshift bellows, the offset will be about an inch. Here's a 300mm f/4 lens with the focus mechanism and aperture removed so there's room to mount it on a bellows: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography/pg1pc4 Looks cool ... well awkward and heavy anyway. This one is *not* sharp... perhaps a bad copy or just cheap design, but it's interesting and fun to play with. It probably produces a decent image stopped down. Here's a crazy home made tilt/shift mount for a respectable Russian 28mm fisheye: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography...-camera/pg1pc3 Insane! Love it! Where are the phots taken with it? -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
"Alan Browne" skrev i en meddelelse ... Max Perl wrote: I still have my adapter to use Hasselblad lenses on Nikon SLR. I have now sold my Hasselblad equipment but I had the CFE 50, CFi 50, 120, 180. The lenses focuses opposite the Nikkors (so you have to turn opposite the indicater in the viewfinder) and the Hasselblad lenses are very large. You have to use stop down metering. You can get good results but in the long run I don't think you will use it. I could see no better performance over the Nikkors. The Hasselblad lenses also have very few apperture blades and do not use rounded blades either. The CFi 50 + adapter is very much to carry for a normal lens. An idea could be if you don't have a macro lens and then use the 120mm. If a SLR came out with a larger sensor the 24x36 then the adapter (or another because a larger mount may be necessary) could be very useful. Thanks. I don't have a wide-ish portrait lens (I'm considering the CZ 85 f/1.4) so I'd like to try my 80mm Hassy lens on the Sony a900. That might suffice (though I doubt it is as sharp as the 85mm f/1.4, and it's certainly not as fast). I wrote wrong.......my CFE lens was the 80/2.8. The 80 is the smallest lens but with adapter still quite large. When I had the 80/2.8 I made a small "bokeh" test with the 80-85 mm lenses I had to mount on my D2x. http://www.pbase.com/mxp/85mmtest I think the Zeiss has the worst bokeh in this test......but the difference among the lenses were smaller than I expected. Test target could probably be better. If just the old AI'ed 85/1.8 H-C had rounded blades like the AFD 85/1.4...... Also would like to try the 120 Makro on there. I'm not sure my 150 will be all that useful, however. The 120 is very good. And with macro you usally set it to a magnification and then move the whole setup to get perfect focus. But still a bit tricky if you want to stop down to 8 or 11....then the image will be dark and much eassier to focus at full apperture (e.g. if you what to take images of moving targets.....insects etc.) Don't top post please. Max "Alan Browne" skrev i en meddelelse ... I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? I expect it will require stop down metering (or incident meter or histo test metering) and of course there's no AF (no problem). -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Max Perl wrote:
"Alan Browne" skrev i en meddelelse ... Max Perl wrote: I still have my adapter to use Hasselblad lenses on Nikon SLR. I have now sold my Hasselblad equipment but I had the CFE 50, CFi 50, 120, 180. The lenses focuses opposite the Nikkors (so you have to turn opposite the indicater in the viewfinder) and the Hasselblad lenses are very large. You have to use stop down metering. You can get good results but in the long run I don't think you will use it. I could see no better performance over the Nikkors. The Hasselblad lenses also have very few apperture blades and do not use rounded blades either. The CFi 50 + adapter is very much to carry for a normal lens. An idea could be if you don't have a macro lens and then use the 120mm. If a SLR came out with a larger sensor the 24x36 then the adapter (or another because a larger mount may be necessary) could be very useful. Thanks. I don't have a wide-ish portrait lens (I'm considering the CZ 85 f/1.4) so I'd like to try my 80mm Hassy lens on the Sony a900. That might suffice (though I doubt it is as sharp as the 85mm f/1.4, and it's certainly not as fast). I wrote wrong.......my CFE lens was the 80/2.8. The 80 is the smallest lens but with adapter still quite large. When I had the 80/2.8 I made a small "bokeh" test with the 80-85 mm lenses I had to mount on my D2x. http://www.pbase.com/mxp/85mmtest I think the Zeiss has the worst bokeh in this test......but the difference among the lenses were smaller than I expected. Test target could probably be better. If just the old AI'ed 85/1.8 H-C had rounded blades like the AFD 85/1.4...... I've had bad bokeh with the 5 bladers too (80 and 150), esp. doing shots in the woods and getting pentagonal highlights off of leaves... I don't expect this to be an issue with portraits or macro, however. Also would like to try the 120 Makro on there. I'm not sure my 150 will be all that useful, however. The 120 is very good. And with macro you usally set it to a magnification and then move the whole setup to get perfect focus. But still a bit tricky if you want to stop down to 8 or 11....then the image will be dark and much eassier to focus at full apperture (e.g. if you what to take images of moving targets.....insects etc.) Yep., -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Alan Browne wrote:
Paul Furman wrote: Alan Browne wrote: I've located an adaptor for Hasselblad lenses to Minolta A-mount. I'm tempted. Anyone use these? What are the tradeoffs? ... ... The advantage is you can do tilt/shift. Not with adaptor I'm looking at. Shifting for perspective correction isn't very useful for a long lens and not all lenses hold up well tilted. You can easily test the concept by wrapping some black fabric around the mount as a makeshift bellows, the offset will be about an inch. Here's a 300mm f/4 lens with the focus mechanism and aperture removed so there's room to mount it on a bellows: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography/pg1pc4 Looks cool ... well awkward and heavy anyway. A lot smaller than the 300/2.8 on the same bellows that you saw :-) This one is *not* sharp... perhaps a bad copy or just cheap design, but it's interesting and fun to play with. It probably produces a decent image stopped down. Here's a crazy home made tilt/shift mount for a respectable Russian 28mm [correction: 30mm] fisheye: http://edgehill.net/Misc/photography...-camera/pg1pc3 Insane! Love it! Where are the phots taken with it? This is really the only good/interesting technical shot I did with it: http://edgehill.net/Misc/misc-photos...ull-set/pg2pc7 -the next shot shows the setup. -on the D200 that's a normal lens, I don't know if it could be duplicated simply by stopping down, this isn't very sharp. Here's some more (but they have the freaky DOF look): http://edgehill.net/Southwest/12-21-...07-bisbee-tilt I use the lens with a floppy hand held mount for that freaky look, it's a lot less hassle than the big rig. Here's some on the D700: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/2080128112/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3233820872/ -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Paul Furman wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Insane! Love it! Where are the phots taken with it? This is really the only good/interesting technical shot I did with it: http://edgehill.net/Misc/misc-photos...ull-set/pg2pc7 -the next shot shows the setup. -on the D200 that's a normal lens, I don't know if it could be duplicated simply by stopping down, this isn't very sharp. The strings look quite straight, but there's a little keystoning in guitar walls. Cool shot (You've posted it before now that I think about it...). Here's some more (but they have the freaky DOF look): http://edgehill.net/Southwest/12-21-...07-bisbee-tilt That is odd... I use the lens with a floppy hand held mount for that freaky look, it's a lot less hassle than the big rig. Here's some on the D700: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/2080128112/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3233820872/ I think this approach could be taken a lot further in composition, color contrast (as suggested in the 2nd image). In fact I have a notion that in the studio with several models this could be used to very cool effect. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
MF to 35mm adaptors
Alan Browne wrote:
Max Perl wrote: I still have my adapter to use Hasselblad lenses on Nikon SLR. I have now sold my Hasselblad equipment but I had the CFE 50, CFi 50, 120, 180. The lenses focuses opposite the Nikkors (so you have to turn opposite the indicater in the viewfinder) and the Hasselblad lenses are very large. You have to use stop down metering. You can get good results but in the long run I don't think you will use it. I could see no better performance over the Nikkors. The Hasselblad lenses also have very few apperture blades and do not use rounded blades either. The CFi 50 + adapter is very much to carry for a normal lens. An idea could be if you don't have a macro lens and then use the 120mm. If a SLR came out with a larger sensor the 24x36 then the adapter (or another because a larger mount may be necessary) could be very useful. Thanks. I don't have a wide-ish portrait lens (I'm considering the CZ 85 f/1.4) so I'd like to try my 80mm Hassy lens on the Sony a900. That might suffice (though I doubt it is as sharp as the 85mm f/1.4, and it's certainly not as fast). Also would like to try the 120 Makro on there. I'm not sure my 150 will be all that useful, however. The 120 makro could be useful tilted on a PB-4 bellows. That has about a 50mm extension (before adding adapters) so I'm not sure how far the longest view would be, perhaps only rather extreme macros. I use an 85mm T/S for flower closeups almost daily and frequently take advantage of the tilting to capture what I want in focus. DOF is of course limited for closeups so this is actually useful/meaningful. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MF to 35mm adaptors | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 20 | May 19th 09 07:33 PM |
Canon A610 lens adaptors | SimonLW | Digital Photography | 0 | February 7th 06 12:26 PM |
Lens mount adaptors | Roxy d'Urban | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | May 3rd 05 06:09 AM |
Lens mount adaptors | Roxy d'Urban | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | April 28th 05 02:03 PM |
FA: Coolpix 5000 + Adaptors | Jim | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 16th 03 06:48 AM |