If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
I'm being asked to sell the pics I've been taken at our Western Riding
Club shows, apparently they're good enough people are actually *asking* to pay money for 'em (cool!) I show the pics on the club website (cawri.com), at 640x480, which provides a decent 4x6 print, and encourage folks to print those images for free. Now, I've been printing my own photos for years. I just take the biggest copy I have, and print that at whatever resolution I need, ignoring ppi, which appears to be at 72ppi on my current images according to ThumbsPlus. I got decent photos at 8x10, even with my older cameras, back to 1.5MP. I've been getting excellent photos with 5MP cameras and above, at 8x10. Now, I'm looking at something that's explaining resolution vs print size, and saying for my 6MP camera the max I can print is 10x6 @300ppi. Hmmm. My concern is, I'm thinking of providing the digital files rather than printing them (that was a big pain last time I did it). I was thinking of providing and charging for the files based on the biggest image it would print... So for example, at 72ppi, I could provide a 1024x768 image intended to print an 8x10. At 300ppi, I'd have to provide a full-sized 10MP image (3888x2592). I don't quite understand the difference, since it appears I've been happily printing at the lower ppi for years without loss of quality - pictures I've printed have won photo contests, even! Can someone help explain this discrepancy? I could use some advice as to the best way to provide digital images to my prospective customers, that gives them the resolution to print to the size they want, and no bigger. Or is there a better way I should be doing this? Appreciate any advice! jmc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
"jmc" wrote in message ... I'm being asked to sell the pics I've been taken at our Western Riding Club shows, apparently they're good enough people are actually *asking* to pay money for 'em (cool!) I show the pics on the club website (cawri.com), at 640x480, which provides a decent 4x6 print, and encourage folks to print those images for free. Now, I've been printing my own photos for years. I just take the biggest copy I have, and print that at whatever resolution I need, ignoring ppi, which appears to be at 72ppi on my current images according to ThumbsPlus. I got decent photos at 8x10, even with my older cameras, back to 1.5MP. I've been getting excellent photos with 5MP cameras and above, at 8x10. Now, I'm looking at something that's explaining resolution vs print size, and saying for my 6MP camera the max I can print is 10x6 @300ppi. Hmmm. My concern is, I'm thinking of providing the digital files rather than printing them (that was a big pain last time I did it). I was thinking of providing and charging for the files based on the biggest image it would print... So for example, at 72ppi, I could provide a 1024x768 image intended to print an 8x10. At 300ppi, I'd have to provide a full-sized 10MP image (3888x2592). I don't quite understand the difference, since it appears I've been happily printing at the lower ppi for years without loss of quality - pictures I've printed have won photo contests, even! Can someone help explain this discrepancy? I could use some advice as to the best way to provide digital images to my prospective customers, that gives them the resolution to print to the size they want, and no bigger. Or is there a better way I should be doing this? Appreciate any advice! jmc Sorry but I do not see any problem with what you are already doing, if it works then keep using the same method. If it ain't broken then there is nothing to fix. Cheers. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
"jmc" wrote in message ... I'm being asked to sell the pics I've been taken at our Western Riding Club shows, apparently they're good enough people are actually *asking* to pay money for 'em (cool!) snip Can someone help explain this discrepancy? I could use some advice as to the best way to provide digital images to my prospective customers, that gives them the resolution to print to the size they want, and no bigger. Or is there a better way I should be doing this? Appreciate any advice! Have a look here. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...stquality.mspx http://www.digicamguides.com/print/ppi-print-size.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
jmc wrote:
Now, I've been printing my own photos for years. I just take the biggest copy I have, and print that at whatever resolution I need, ignoring ppi, which appears to be at 72ppi on my current images according to ThumbsPlus. [...] I don't quite understand the difference, since it appears I've been happily printing at the lower ppi for years without loss of quality - pictures I've printed have won photo contests, even! No you haven't. You have taken pictures with a certain amount of pixels and printing them at a certain physical size. That gives an effective ppi that has absolutely nothing to do with whatever ppi is stated in the meta-data for the image. It's a common mistake: The ppi stated in the image is just a suggestion for the print-resolution (and size, when we combine it with the amount of pixels). Suggestion being the important word here. You have overruled it when you have been printing. Continue doing that and all will continue to be fine. -- Toke Eskildsen - http://ekot.dk/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
jmc wrote:
I'm being asked to sell the pics I've been taken at our Western Riding Club shows, apparently they're good enough people are actually *asking* to pay money for 'em (cool!) I show the pics on the club website (cawri.com), at 640x480, which provides a decent 4x6 print, and encourage folks to print those images for free. Now, I've been printing my own photos for years. I just take the biggest copy I have, and print that at whatever resolution I need, ignoring ppi, which appears to be at 72ppi on my current images according to ThumbsPlus. I got decent photos at 8x10, even with my older cameras, back to 1.5MP. I've been getting excellent photos with 5MP cameras and above, at 8x10. Now, I'm looking at something that's explaining resolution vs print size, and saying for my 6MP camera the max I can print is 10x6 @300ppi. Hmmm. My concern is, I'm thinking of providing the digital files rather than printing them (that was a big pain last time I did it). I was thinking of providing and charging for the files based on the biggest image it would print... So for example, at 72ppi, I could provide a 1024x768 image intended to print an 8x10. At 300ppi, I'd have to provide a full-sized 10MP image (3888x2592). I don't quite understand the difference, since it appears I've been happily printing at the lower ppi for years without loss of quality - pictures I've printed have won photo contests, even! Can someone help explain this discrepancy? I could use some advice as to the best way to provide digital images to my prospective customers, that gives them the resolution to print to the size they want, and no bigger. Or is there a better way I should be doing this? Appreciate any advice! jmc Most folks find a print at less than 150 ppi too soft. When they buy a print they have already seen, they can't complain. If you sell the file, you'll get lots of complaints, not only of the lack of sharpness but also about other problems, like bad color, when they get prints made at drug stores and the like. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Printing photos question
jmc wrote:
I'm being asked to sell the pics I've been taken at our Western Riding Club shows, apparently they're good enough people are actually *asking* to pay money for 'em (cool!) I show the pics on the club website (cawri.com), at 640x480, which provides a decent 4x6 print, and encourage folks to print those images for free. Now, I've been printing my own photos for years. I just take the biggest copy I have, and print that at whatever resolution I need, ignoring ppi, which appears to be at 72ppi on my current images according to ThumbsPlus. I got decent photos at 8x10, even with my older cameras, back to 1.5MP. I've been getting excellent photos with 5MP cameras and above, at 8x10. Now, I'm looking at something that's explaining resolution vs print size, and saying for my 6MP camera the max I can print is 10x6 @300ppi. Hmmm. My concern is, I'm thinking of providing the digital files rather than printing them (that was a big pain last time I did it). I was thinking of providing and charging for the files based on the biggest image it would print... So for example, at 72ppi, I could provide a 1024x768 image intended to print an 8x10. At 300ppi, I'd have to provide a full-sized 10MP image (3888x2592). I don't quite understand the difference, since it appears I've been happily printing at the lower ppi for years without loss of quality - pictures I've printed have won photo contests, even! Can someone help explain this discrepancy? I could use some advice as to the best way to provide digital images to my prospective customers, that gives them the resolution to print to the size they want, and no bigger. Or is there a better way I should be doing this? Appreciate any advice! jmc The 72ppi you see usually refers to the most common video display setting for resolution, and has NOTHING to do with the printing of an image. If you have a good monitor, you can change that setting to 96, or even 100 or more, and watch Thumbsplus display that new number. As for printing, the 'dream number' is 300 pixels/inch, but this is often more than is necessary for a good image. Something between 150 and 250 pixels/inch is usually more than adequate for 4x6, and some pictures printed at 8x10 look just fine as low as 150 pixels/inch. I would shoot for 200 as a good figure, and just forget about that 72 figure since it has nothing to do with printing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Printing Photos | LuvLatins[_2_] | Digital Photography | 6 | September 10th 07 01:55 PM |
Printing photos? ? ? | Ray[_3_] | Digital Photography | 8 | July 6th 07 06:26 PM |
ppi, dpi, and printing photos | Bob | Digital Photography | 35 | July 24th 04 03:37 AM |
Printing Photos | Tony Cooper | Digital Photography | 7 | July 6th 04 04:36 AM |
Printing from local stores (was, Printing from RiteAid, a question) | TheMage | Digital Photography | 0 | June 25th 04 08:22 PM |