If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group
posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...4177443&page=1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
RichA wrote:
I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...4177443&page=1 So why are you bringing this up here and not on the Olympus group on dpreveiw? Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
On Jul 30, 1:37 pm, Scott W wrote:
RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... So why are you bringing this up here and not on the Olympus group on dpreveiw? Scott It has been well-covered in that forum, to the tune of 103 posts. But the same condition afflicts others on this forum. Willful ignorance about system flaws and attacks on those who mention them. I just thought this example was particularly funny given the "proof" offered to the contrary. I can't fathom the reason behind the blindness. For instance, I own Olympus and I've never disputed certain truths about the brand, such as their high ISO noise and restricted dynamic range. You take the good with the bad. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
"RichA" wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 30, 1:37 pm, Scott W wrote: RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... So why are you bringing this up here and not on the Olympus group on dpreveiw? Scott It has been well-covered in that forum, to the tune of 103 posts. But the same condition afflicts others on this forum. Willful ignorance about system flaws and attacks on those who mention them. I just thought this example was particularly funny given the "proof" offered to the contrary. I can't fathom the reason behind the blindness. For instance, I own Olympus and I've never disputed certain truths about the brand, such as their high ISO noise and restricted dynamic range. You take the good with the bad. And yet amazingly you scream and screech here and other places about flaws in other camera, goose!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:54:21 +1000, Pete D wrote:
And yet amazingly you scream and screech here and other places about flaws in other camera, goose!! As they say, that's rich! (pun intended) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
RichA wrote:
I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...4177443&page=1 How does a selection of photos that were shot raw and converted with a non-oem raw converter that probably doesn't correctly read w/b metadata in the raw file show anything at all? The poster that you refer to probably has a poorly calibrated monitor. DPReview forums are full of posts like that. Mainly there are posts about "sharpness" of lenses and noise at high iso, where tiny images are posted, and nothing can be seen. Because the forum is moderated, and because the threads are linear making it harder for an idiot poster to be flamed in a way that would happen on usenet, idiots proliferate. It's also a favourite place for shills to hang out. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
On Jul 30, 4:54 pm, "Pete D" wrote:
"RichA" wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 30, 1:37 pm, Scott W wrote: RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... So why are you bringing this up here and not on the Olympus group on dpreveiw? Scott It has been well-covered in that forum, to the tune of 103 posts. But the same condition afflicts others on this forum. Willful ignorance about system flaws and attacks on those who mention them. I just thought this example was particularly funny given the "proof" offered to the contrary. I can't fathom the reason behind the blindness. For instance, I own Olympus and I've never disputed certain truths about the brand, such as their high ISO noise and restricted dynamic range. You take the good with the bad. And yet amazingly you scream and screech here and other places about flaws in other camera, goose!! Yes(?), same thing, pointing out FLAWS in cameras, not hiding from them. Is that a difficult concept for some? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
On Jul 30, 5:05 pm, frederick wrote:
RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... How does a selection of photos that were shot raw and converted with a non-oem raw converter that probably doesn't correctly read w/b metadata in the raw file show anything at all? The poster that you refer to probably has a poorly calibrated monitor. The poster was attempting to prove that the original poster was wrong, that there was no magenta issue with the E-510 results and in fact he ended up posting shots that showed clearly there IS a magenta cast issue with the camera. DPReview forums are full of posts like that. Mainly there are posts about "sharpness" of lenses and noise at high iso, where tiny images are posted, and nothing can be seen. Agreed 100%, and if you point out to some of them that a 600x800 image proves nothing about sharpness, or noise, they go beserk. Because the forum is moderated, and because the threads are linear making it harder for an idiot poster to be flamed in a way that would happen on usenet, idiots proliferate. It's also a favourite place for shills to hang out. Good point. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
"RichA" wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 30, 4:54 pm, "Pete D" wrote: "RichA" wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 30, 1:37 pm, Scott W wrote: RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... So why are you bringing this up here and not on the Olympus group on dpreveiw? Scott It has been well-covered in that forum, to the tune of 103 posts. But the same condition afflicts others on this forum. Willful ignorance about system flaws and attacks on those who mention them. I just thought this example was particularly funny given the "proof" offered to the contrary. I can't fathom the reason behind the blindness. For instance, I own Olympus and I've never disputed certain truths about the brand, such as their high ISO noise and restricted dynamic range. You take the good with the bad. And yet amazingly you scream and screech here and other places about flaws in other camera, goose!! Yes(?), same thing, pointing out FLAWS in cameras, not hiding from them. Is that a difficult concept for some? No we live with them and understand that any camera and system will have its FLAWS but we choose the one we can live with and then go out and take photos rather than having to tell EVERYONE about the flaws from EVERY other system. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
When loyalty to a camera system = absolute blindness
"RichA" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 30, 5:05 pm, frederick wrote: RichA wrote: I can't believe some people. Some newby on the dpreview Olympus group posts about a magenta cast in the highlights in images of the Olympus E-510, and the KOOKS who guard the forum attack the guy, some with logically, but some are off the charts stupid. One poster refutes the magenta cast post by posting pictures of his own, but at least FIVE of the images SHOW a magenta cast!!! Unbelievable! Purple rocks, purple roads!!! Look to the image posts from Ben Herrmann about halfway down the page. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...22&thread=2417... How does a selection of photos that were shot raw and converted with a non-oem raw converter that probably doesn't correctly read w/b metadata in the raw file show anything at all? The poster that you refer to probably has a poorly calibrated monitor. The poster was attempting to prove that the original poster was wrong, that there was no magenta issue with the E-510 results and in fact he ended up posting shots that showed clearly there IS a magenta cast issue with the camera. DPReview forums are full of posts like that. Mainly there are posts about "sharpness" of lenses and noise at high iso, where tiny images are posted, and nothing can be seen. Agreed 100%, and if you point out to some of them that a 600x800 image proves nothing about sharpness, or noise, they go beserk. Because the forum is moderated, and because the threads are linear making it harder for an idiot poster to be flamed in a way that would happen on usenet, idiots proliferate. It's also a favourite place for shills to hang out. Good point. Ha Ha, you resemble that remark, right. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A quick colour blindness test | m II | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | May 10th 07 03:20 PM |
ABSOLUTE BEST digital camera? | Girl | Digital Photography | 16 | April 28th 07 06:53 PM |
color blindness question | Marcus | Digital Photography | 13 | December 2nd 06 12:31 AM |
Absolute beginner needs advivce | Bert | Large Format Photography Equipment | 280 | September 16th 04 12:32 PM |
Absolute beginner needs advivce | No One | Large Format Photography Equipment | 49 | September 10th 04 02:12 PM |