If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical
viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
"N.Morrow" wrote in message ... I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow If you are judging the rear screens, look for a brightness setting in the menu. If you are looking through the eyepiece VF, make sure the lenses are the same speed and set to the same zoom settings. BTW, the Nikon bodies below the D80/D90 use mirrors instead of the brighter pentaprisms. I don't know what various models of Canons use... --DR |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
On 23/06/2010 9:44 a.m., N.Morrow wrote:
I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Nikon's DSLR viewfinders are very dark unless charged batteries are in the camera. I guess that the D3000/5000 VF are similar to Canon XS. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:51:48 -0400, "David Ruether"
wrote: : : "N.Morrow" wrote in message : ... : : I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit : brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead : batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a : characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? Maybe the Nikon needs power to keep the lens at full aperture and ther Canon doesn't. : If you are judging the rear screens, look for a brightness setting : in the menu. If you are looking through the eyepiece VF, make : sure the lenses are the same speed and set to the same zoom : settings. BTW, the Nikon bodies below the D80/D90 use mirrors : instead of the brighter pentaprisms. I don't know what various : models of Canons use... I'm pretty sure the XS uses mirrors. Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
On 2010-06-22 14:44:07 -0700, "N.Morrow" said:
I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow If you are talking about the actual viewfinder, then the problem is the dead batteries. Nikon cameras default to stopping down the lens all the way if the batteries are dead. Of course, if you are talking about the LCD on the back, not only is not a viewfinder but it does not work at all without batteries. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
In article , Me
writes On 23/06/2010 9:44 a.m., N.Morrow wrote: I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Nikon's DSLR viewfinders are very dark unless charged batteries are in the camera. Don't confuse viewfinders with displays. SLR viewfinders are optical, they don't use electricity so battery status *should* be irrelevant in any comparison. What matters with an optical viewfinder is: 1: How fast is the lens? Make sure that you are comparing equal f/# lenses or taking the difference into account - and "bright" focus screens don't show the benefit of fast optics as much as dim focus screens, so it not only better to compare at the same f/# but at the f/# of the lenses you are likely to use. Also, be sure the lens is fully open when you make the comparison - as others have commented this may depend on whether the lens is powered: Canon are open fully by default, with Nikon it depends on the lens. 2: What is the viewfinder technology? As someone else mentioned, cheap cameras use penta-mirrors instead of pentaprisms - and get darker viewfinders as a result and, more significantly, are more prone to loss of viewfinder/sensor alignment as they wear. Do your research, although in this case all of the cameras you are comparing have cheap pentamirrors. 3: What is the viewfinder magnification? Expect a larger viewfinder image to be darker if everything else is equal - sensor size, f/#, etc. 4: If everything else is the same - as far as you can tell - it might just be the focus screen, bit even that isn't as simple as you might think. Bright focus screens are great for low light work, but they don't show depth of field very well - making the camera's DOF Preview button often worse than useless in that it gives a completely false and very optimistic DOF preview. A darker focus screen gives a better DOF preview, but is less useful for framing the subject in low light. Not such a problem if you can use Live-view, but in a lot of situations you can't (eg. night time wildlife). Pays your money - takes your choice. ;-) -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's ****ed. Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:11:11 +0100, Kennedy McEwen
wrote: In article , Me writes On 23/06/2010 9:44 a.m., N.Morrow wrote: I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Nikon's DSLR viewfinders are very dark unless charged batteries are in the camera. Don't confuse viewfinders with displays. SLR viewfinders are optical, they don't use electricity so battery status *should* be irrelevant in any comparison. What matters with an optical viewfinder is: 1: How fast is the lens? Make sure that you are comparing equal f/# lenses or taking the difference into account - and "bright" focus screens don't show the benefit of fast optics as much as dim focus screens, so it not only better to compare at the same f/# but at the f/# of the lenses you are likely to use. Also, be sure the lens is fully open when you make the comparison - as others have commented this may depend on whether the lens is powered: Canon are open fully by default, with Nikon it depends on the lens. 2: What is the viewfinder technology? As someone else mentioned, cheap cameras use penta-mirrors instead of pentaprisms - and get darker viewfinders as a result and, more significantly, are more prone to loss of viewfinder/sensor alignment as they wear. Do your research, although in this case all of the cameras you are comparing have cheap pentamirrors. 3: What is the viewfinder magnification? Expect a larger viewfinder image to be darker if everything else is equal - sensor size, f/#, etc. 4: If everything else is the same - as far as you can tell - it might just be the focus screen, bit even that isn't as simple as you might think. Bright focus screens are great for low light work, but they don't show depth of field very well - making the camera's DOF Preview button often worse than useless in that it gives a completely false and very optimistic DOF preview. A darker focus screen gives a better DOF preview, but is less useful for framing the subject in low light. Not such a problem if you can use Live-view, but in a lot of situations you can't (eg. night time wildlife). Pays your money - takes your choice. ;-) Thanks for outlining a whole other list of reasons why DSLRs are pieces of **** to add to my "100 REASONS WHY P&S's ARE BETTER" list. Now it's 104. Btw: If your live-view doesn't ramp up in gain in dim lighting, as it does on all my P&S cameras so that I can focus and compose shots in lighting too dim to see in any optical viewfinder, you might want to talk to the designers of your POS cameras about leaving out that highly beneficial feature of EVF and LCD viewfinders on most every P&S camera. :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
"Kennedy McEwen" wrote in message ... In article , Me writes On 23/06/2010 9:44 a.m., N.Morrow wrote: I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Nikon's DSLR viewfinders are very dark unless charged batteries are in the camera. Don't confuse viewfinders with displays. SLR viewfinders are optical, they don't use electricity so battery status *should* be irrelevant in any comparison. But it is relevant. This phenomenon has been around for an age. There are some dSLRs that intentionally dim the viewfinder when power is off. (I wasn't aware that this was a Nikon thing, though, and I don't know how they do it. But it's an old story.) Whether that's a feature or a bug is another question, but the fact remains that you have to power them up to compare. -- David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
"N.Morrow" wrote in message ... I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Nikons seem to default to around a mid aperture setting when turned off. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dim Nikon viewfinder compared to Canon?
"Ben Dover" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:11:11 +0100, Kennedy McEwen wrote: In article , Me writes On 23/06/2010 9:44 a.m., N.Morrow wrote: I'm shopping for a DSLR and comparing Nikon and Canon models. The optical viewfinder on the Canon XS seemed to be quite a bit brighter than either the Nikon D3000 or D5000. I'm talking a couple of f-stops brighter. None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark) and the viewing was done inside a store with flourescent lights. Is the dim viewfinder a characteristic of Nikon, or there something else I'm missing? -N.Morrow Thanks for outlining a whole other list of reasons why DSLRs are pieces of **** to add to my "100 REASONS WHY P&S's ARE BETTER" list. Now it's 104. Btw: If your live-view doesn't ramp up in gain in dim lighting, as it does on all my P&S cameras so that I can focus and compose shots in lighting too dim to see in any optical viewfinder, you might want to talk to the designers of your POS cameras about leaving out that highly beneficial feature of EVF and LCD viewfinders on most every P&S camera. Gee TROLL BOY your reading comprehension is pretty poor. The OP said: "The optical viewfinder" not the LCD screen. He also said; "None of the cameras were turned on (dead batteries is a Sears demo trademark)" Nikon requires power for the aperture to open up, no power- lens closes down. DUH!!! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Small viewfinder compared to film slr | geez | Digital Photography | 4 | June 8th 06 09:37 PM |
D100 Nikon compared to 10D Canon | Ryadia | Digital Photography | 10 | December 26th 04 09:21 AM |
Canon Powershot a80 as compared to the a95. | Mydnight | Digital Photography | 8 | October 26th 04 11:18 PM |
Canon i960 Compared to New Canon Pixma P6000D Photo Preinter: Opinions On ? | Robert11 | Digital Photography | 4 | October 21st 04 04:31 PM |
Proportions of 10D viewfinder compared to 8x10 crop | Jay Stalman | Digital Photography | 25 | August 10th 04 07:48 PM |