ping nospaam

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch,
and you said it was impossible.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood
what he said. You were right.


--
PeterN

On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch,

No you didn't.

and you said it was impossible.

No, he didn't.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood
what he said.
Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully?
Comprehension is lacking.

You were right.

No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!!





--

The above non-sensical gainsaying of everything and a few critical
remarks is my impression of a number of threads.

Well done, Peter for bellying up to the bar and admitting a wrong
statement. But it's certainly possible to order an Apple Watch for
$10,000 or more. (no "i")

On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch,

No you didn't.

and you said it was impossible.

No, he didn't.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood
what he said.
Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully?
Comprehension is lacking.

You were right.

No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!!

You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion.


--
PeterN

On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said:

On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch,

No you didn't.

and you said it was impossible.

No, he didn't.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I misunderstood
what he said.
Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully?
Comprehension is lacking.

You were right.

No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!!

You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion.

....and you missed the Pythonesque "argument".

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 9/14/2015 10:11 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said:

On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000 iWatch,

No you didn't.

and you said it was impossible.

No, he didn't.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I
misunderstood
what he said.
Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully?
Comprehension is lacking.

You were right.

No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!!

You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion.

...and you missed the Pythonesque "argument".


Probably

--
PeterN

On 9/15/15 PDT 10:07 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 9/14/2015 10:11 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-09-15 01:56:28 +0000, PeterN said:

On 9/13/2015 1:02 PM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 9/13/15 PDT 1:25 AM, PeterN wrote:

In a prior thread I stated that one of my friends had a $10,000
iWatch,

No you didn't.

and you said it was impossible.

No, he didn't.

I confirmed the other day that he had only spent $1,000. I
misunderstood
what he said.
Yes, you really, really did! Can't you learn to listen carefully?
Comprehension is lacking.

You were right.

No he wasn't, just because you were wrong. READ!!

You misread what I said, but it is not worth a discussion.

...and you missed the Pythonesque "argument".


Probably

Perhaps you missed the critical information in the signature line
contained in the first reply.