If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I'm happy to have at least a few years worth of TechPan left in the freezer. I mostly use it at EI400 in T-MAX developer. e.g. http://www.phred.org/~josh/photo/CandyCane.jpg -- is Joshua Putnam http://www.phred.org/~josh/ Updated Infrared Photography Gallery: http://www.phred.org/~josh/photo/ir.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"F.C. Trevor Gale" wrote in message ... Greetings; I've just developed the last of the monochrome films from a recent vacation in Wengen, Switzerland - some of these were Ilford FP4+ and HP5+, a couple of Ilford SFX-200 (for the red sensitivity) and three rolls of Kodak TechPan rated at nominal 25ASA but exposed at a stop under and over in some shots. All 120-roll, of course. Now, I read, or have read, here and in other places, that TechPan is 'tricky' or 'difficult' or 'you have to process critically' (etc etc), yet quite frankly the TechPan negatives I have are the best of the lot. Using Technidol developer at 20degsC for 10m 15secs with 10-secs agitation every 45secs dev time in a Paterson spiral tank, it has given me a great tonal range and of course fine grain and a very clear base. Now that is what I have come to expect - I've used TP120 for quite a time now, only of course when I need a faster film I opt for Ilford emulsions, even the Delta films. My quesion is: why do so many folks find TechPan so "difficult"? My next question is, clearly, what will come to replace TechPan after my 'fridge stocks run out? Anyone any ideas? My regards, F.C. Trevor Gale. I think partly because people try to develop it in standard developers relying on high dilution to get the extra-low contrast required. It may do that but will also distort the tone rendition. Kodak's recommended procedures work just fine. I used to use a lot of Tech Pan, developed in Technidol. I developed for slightly lower contrast than the Kodak guide, exposing at around EI-15 and using Technidol liquid. Since TP is now discontinued the closest to it is 100T-Max in Microdol-X, but its not the same. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak TechPan - not difficult! | Claudio Bonavolta | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 11th 05 11:28 PM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Kodak Perfect Touch Processing | Jeremy | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | October 28th 04 08:16 PM |
Buy film, not equipment. | Geoffrey S. Mendelson | In The Darkroom | 545 | October 24th 04 09:25 PM |
Kodak Gold 100 vs Kodak Bright Sun vs Kodak High Definition Colour Film | Graham Fountain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | October 5th 04 12:57 AM |