If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Print Quality
I notice that some photographers can get a reasonable price for their
services and some are struggling and charge "reasonable prices" i.e. budget prices in order to get the business. My question to those that can get $150 for a portrait setting - how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? And the same question to those photographers that can only get $50 for a sitting, how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? J |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Print Quality
I notice that some photographers can get a reasonable price for their services and some are struggling and charge "reasonable prices" i.e. budget prices in order to get the business. My question to those that can get $150 for a portrait setting - how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? And the same question to those photographers that can only get $50 for a sitting, how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? The chances are, the expensive print and the cheap print cost the same, especially in these days of digital where the photog can retouch and custom print the file for a lab/service center to feed it to a machine. but in the old film days, the ideal was to get it on film, so you don't have to crop beyond standard cards, so you didn't have to burn and dodge. with styling, make up and a bit of soft focus your retouching bill wasn't a surprise. So the middle class photog and the semi volume studio probably paid the same 2.50 for a 5x7, or 4 bucks for a unit, 2 5x7's on a sheet. but lets look at a $400 8x10. Just from the lab procedures, a custom print (though why bother cause the guy with this much control of the image usually doesn't need it) is mounted on a quality board, but first there is neg retouching, usually with a outside specialist who can micro-retouch so someone doesn't have to fix up the blobs on the print. the print is mounted and a finisher, who doesn't have to fix the retoucher's problems, or in fact does have to, but will knock off the spectral shiny forehead, eye glass rims tip of the nose, then sharpen and brighten the eyes, dry the corners, and darken the lashes, and finally put in an almost white catch light and kill the others, maybe clean off a few stray hairs. give if a sealing coat of lacquer. cost, $90 to 150. this reply is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Print Quality
In article ,
Jack says... I notice that some photographers can get a reasonable price for their services and some are struggling and charge "reasonable prices" i.e. budget prices in order to get the business. That is related to photographic skills and/or mercantile skills in various combinations. Some are able to sell the last crap for gold, some won't even be able to give gold away for free because people don't have trust in them. My question to those that can get $150 for a portrait setting - how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? And the same question to those photographers that can only get $50 for a sitting, how much do you pay for your 7 x 5 prints? Why would a lab give prints to them for different prices? Same lab effort, same price. -- Michael Quack http://www.photoquack.de/glamour/1.htm http://www.photoquack.de/fashion/1.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
contact print exposure time | John Bartley | Large Format Photography Equipment | 16 | July 12th 04 10:47 PM |
Kodak Easyshare won't Print | Andy Ody | Digital Photography | 1 | June 30th 04 02:04 AM |
Scanning prints to touch up and print | Bob Williams | Digital Photography | 0 | June 24th 04 08:22 AM |
JPEG Questions: Loss In Quality When "Saving" | Xtx99 | General Photography Techniques | 3 | April 8th 04 04:25 PM |
DIY print washer | f/256 | In The Darkroom | 10 | February 6th 04 01:44 PM |