If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. - Jay Leno, The Tonight Show, 6/10/04 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
William Graham wrote:
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"Frank ess" wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: "David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. Yes.....Bush freed the Iraqi people. If only for a little while. I hope they remain free, but if they don't, at least Bush gave them the chance. But you are definitely right. A tyrant has to kill large numbers of people to keep the rest docile. And, as long as one has to kill people, one might as well have lots of fun doing it, so that explains Saddam's torture chambers and rape rooms. And if Jay Leno doesn't see that Bush doesn't maintain torture chambers and rape rooms, well, that's his stupidity, not mine, but I'm sure he got a good laugh with his little joke. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"William Graham" wrote in message news:LapCc.135220$3x.55289@attbi_s54... "Frank ess" wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: "David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. Yes.....Bush freed the Iraqi people. If only for a little while. I hope they remain free, but if they don't, at least Bush gave them the chance. But you are definitely right. A tyrant has to kill large numbers of people to keep the rest docile. And, as long as one has to kill people, one might as well have lots of fun doing it, so that explains Saddam's torture chambers and rape rooms. And if Jay Leno doesn't see that Bush doesn't maintain torture chambers and rape rooms, well, that's his stupidity, not mine, but I'm sure he got a good laugh with his little joke. How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"D.R." DR@NewZealand wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:LapCc.135220$3x.55289@attbi_s54... "Frank ess" wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: "David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. Yes.....Bush freed the Iraqi people. If only for a little while. I hope they remain free, but if they don't, at least Bush gave them the chance. But you are definitely right. A tyrant has to kill large numbers of people to keep the rest docile. And, as long as one has to kill people, one might as well have lots of fun doing it, so that explains Saddam's torture chambers and rape rooms. And if Jay Leno doesn't see that Bush doesn't maintain torture chambers and rape rooms, well, that's his stupidity, not mine, but I'm sure he got a good laugh with his little joke. How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... Well, if you want to change the subject.....Sure, ---I'll bite. I was in Europe about 15 years ago, and I had to pay $3.50 a gallon for gasoline. Today, $2.20 a gallon here in the US is really pretty cheap. Why the price is exactly what it is I can't say for sure, but the ME cartel fixes the price to maximize the amount of money they make, and the president tries to not use up our oil reserves so that when the world runs out of oil, we will be the last ones to run out. I have it on pretty good authority that we won't run out for another 50 years or more, so I think it's a moot point, because by that time there will be enough alternative energy sources that it won't really matter. (In my opinion) As far as the "US oil getting under their sand", if it weren't for the West, they would still be riding their camels over that sand and wouldn't have a clue that there was anything down there that was more valuable than well water. We found it, drilled for it, pumped it up, built the refineries and cracked it into gasoline, sold them the Caddies, and built their roads and taught them how to drive around with it. All they ever learned to do was quote the Koran and hate Americans. Belong to us? - No, not quite. But pretty damn near......... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
William Graham wrote:
"D.R." DR@NewZealand wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:LapCc.135220$3x.55289@attbi_s54... "Frank ess" wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: "David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. Yes.....Bush freed the Iraqi people. If only for a little while. I hope they remain free, but if they don't, at least Bush gave them the chance. But you are definitely right. A tyrant has to kill large numbers of people to keep the rest docile. And, as long as one has to kill people, one might as well have lots of fun doing it, so that explains Saddam's torture chambers and rape rooms. And if Jay Leno doesn't see that Bush doesn't maintain torture chambers and rape rooms, well, that's his stupidity, not mine, but I'm sure he got a good laugh with his little joke. How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... Well, if you want to change the subject.....Sure, ---I'll bite. I was in Europe about 15 years ago, and I had to pay $3.50 a gallon for gasoline. Today, $2.20 a gallon here in the US is really pretty cheap. Why the price is exactly what it is I can't say for sure, but the ME cartel fixes the price to maximize the amount of money they make, and the president tries to not use up our oil reserves so that when the world runs out of oil, we will be the last ones to run out. I have it on pretty good authority that we won't run out for another 50 years or more, so I think it's a moot point, because by that time there will be enough alternative energy sources that it won't really matter. (In my opinion) As far as the "US oil getting under their sand", if it weren't for the West, they would still be riding their camels over that sand and wouldn't have a clue that there was anything down there that was more valuable than well water. We found it, drilled for it, pumped it up, built the refineries and cracked it into gasoline, sold them the Caddies, and built their roads and taught them how to drive around with it. All they ever learned to do was quote the Koran and hate Americans. Belong to us? - No, not quite. But pretty damn near......... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
In rec.photo.equipment.35mm D.R. DR@newzealand wrote:
How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... That is much more related to unrest in middle east (of which there is much more) than Iraqi oil. -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"Sander Vesik" wrote in message ... In rec.photo.equipment.35mm D.R. DR@newzealand wrote: How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? So Bush's buddies can make out like gangbusters of course. Cheap oil doesn't reallly work well for oil companies. They like to buy it low and then sell it high. Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... That is much more related to unrest in middle east (of which there is much more) than Iraqi oil. But almost all the unrest in the ME is caused by American industrial imperialism and support for Israeli occupation of Palestinian (claimed) territory. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
"William Graham" wrote in message news:GJtCc.168438$Ly.30810@attbi_s01... "D.R." DR@NewZealand wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:LapCc.135220$3x.55289@attbi_s54... "Frank ess" wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: "David Nebenzahl" wrote in message ... According to the New York Times, last year White House lawyers concluded that President Bush could legally order interrogators to torture and even kill people in the interest of national security--so if that's legal, what the hell are we charging Saddam Hussein with? Killing & torturing them without any threat to his national security......Just because he liked to kill & torture people. He "liked" to kill and torture people to keep the remainder docile. Now they are discovering what non-docile behavior can do. Ol' Bush accomplished something, anyway. Yes.....Bush freed the Iraqi people. If only for a little while. I hope they remain free, but if they don't, at least Bush gave them the chance. But you are definitely right. A tyrant has to kill large numbers of people to keep the rest docile. And, as long as one has to kill people, one might as well have lots of fun doing it, so that explains Saddam's torture chambers and rape rooms. And if Jay Leno doesn't see that Bush doesn't maintain torture chambers and rape rooms, well, that's his stupidity, not mine, but I'm sure he got a good laugh with his little joke. How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... Well, if you want to change the subject.....Sure, ---I'll bite. I was in Europe about 15 years ago, and I had to pay $3.50 a gallon for gasoline. Today, $2.20 a gallon here in the US is really pretty cheap. Why the price is exactly what it is I can't say for sure, but the ME cartel fixes the price to maximize the amount of money they make, and the president tries to not use up our oil reserves so that when the world runs out of oil, we will be the last ones to run out. I have it on pretty good authority that we won't run out for another 50 years or more, so I think it's a moot point, because by that time there will be enough alternative energy sources that it won't really matter. (In my opinion) As far as the "US oil getting under their sand", if it weren't for the West, they would still be riding their camels over that sand and wouldn't have a clue that there was anything down there that was more valuable than well water. We found it, drilled for it, pumped it up, built the refineries and cracked it into gasoline, sold them the Caddies, and built their roads and taught them how to drive around with it. All they ever learned to do was quote the Koran and hate Americans. Belong to us? - No, not quite. But pretty damn near......... In the case of Iraq, actually it was us, not you... You did it with Saudi. Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
[Survey] -Prime Lenses in the kit -results
adm wrote:
"Sander Vesik" wrote in message ... In rec.photo.equipment.35mm D.R. DR@newzealand wrote: How come now that the iraqi oil has been liberated, that we are still paying record high price at the pump for gas? So Bush's buddies can make out like gangbusters of course. Cheap oil doesn't reallly work well for oil companies. They like to buy it low and then sell it high. Damn that Iraq, I don't know how the US oil got under their sand in the first place.... That is much more related to unrest in middle east (of which there is much more) than Iraqi oil. But almost all the unrest in the ME is caused by American industrial imperialism and support for Israeli occupation of Palestinian (claimed) territory. followup set |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|