KIDS LOVE THE FABULOUS EOS-1V !!!

I had an hour or so to kill tonight so I decided to scan a slide on my
Minolta SE 5400.
What fun!

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Actually one of your better compositions I think. Seriously, look at
the different reactions from the subjects. I really like it. Sorry it
took you 57 minutes, 33 seconds to scan it!

uw wayne wrote:
Actually one of your better compositions I think. Seriously, look at
the different reactions from the subjects. I really like it. Sorry it
took you 57 minutes, 33 seconds to scan it!


Agreed, definitely one of his best
(& no lens cap eating episode this time...)

Annika1980 wrote:

I had an hour or so to kill tonight so I decided to scan a slide on my
Minolta SE 5400.
What fun!

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Reminds me of why I went digital. The greens are crap.

Colin D.

"Colin D" wrote in message
...


Annika1980 wrote:

I had an hour or so to kill tonight so I decided to scan a slide on my
Minolta SE 5400.
What fun!

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Reminds me of why I went digital. The greens are crap.

Colin D.

Reminds me of what an asshole colin d is.

--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Reminds me of why I went digital. The greens are crap.

That's funny. I always thought digital's biggest weakness was in the
greens. They always look too "yellowish" to me.

This pic was taken with Fuji Astia, which gives a very neutral image.
A film like Velvia which bumps up the greens a bit might be more to
your liking.

To me, a perfect camera system would just capture what it sees without
changing anything. Then it is up to me to convert that neutral image
into what I want it to look like. So the finished photograph isn't so
much what the scene really looked like, but instead is the artist's
interpretation of what he was feeling when he viewed the scene. This
may explain why I usually stay away from B&W. I don't see in B&W and I
don't want to see in B&W.
A world without color would be a bit too "Republican" for me.

So the finished photograph isn't so
much what the scene really looked like, but instead is the artist's
interpretation of what he was feeling when he viewed the scene. This
may explain why I usually stay away from B&W. I don't see in B&W and I
don't want to see in B&W.


Again, photography is an art. It is totally up to the artist. Personally, I
find I see details better in B&W. I find that the mind gets distracted
trying to "look around colors" and potentially misses some interesting
details that are easier seen in B&W. I shoot as much of not more B&W than I
do color slide film.


A world without color would be a bit too "Republican" for me.

"Republican"? I think that reducing photography to politics is a low blow.

F1

--
Message posted via PhotoKB.com
http://www.photokb.com/Uwe/Forums.as...-35mm/200512/1

Annika1980 wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Reminds me of why I went digital. The greens are crap.

That's funny. I always thought digital's biggest weakness was in the
greens. They always look too "yellowish" to me.

To me greens come out looking almost white in places when photographed
with the 20D.
http://upload.pbase.com/konascott/im...51048/original

Scott

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Actually one of your better compositions I think. Seriously, look at
the different reactions from the subjects. I really like it.

Thanks. I kinda liked it, too.

"Annika1980" wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/53028788

Reminds me of why I went digital. The greens are crap.

That's funny. I always thought digital's biggest weakness was in the
greens. They always look too "yellowish" to me.

This pic was taken with Fuji Astia, which gives a very neutral image.
A film like Velvia which bumps up the greens a bit might be more to
your liking.

To me, a perfect camera system would just capture what it sees without
changing anything. Then it is up to me to convert that neutral image
into what I want it to look like. So the finished photograph isn't so
much what the scene really looked like, but instead is the artist's
interpretation of what he was feeling when he viewed the scene. This
may explain why I usually stay away from B&W. I don't see in B&W and I
don't want to see in B&W.
A world without color would be a bit too "Republican" for me.


Dude, I'm so far from republican, it hurts when you say that!

--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com