If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I suspect that one reason may be that Apple devices do not actually have a USB connection. yes they do. The handling of USB is dealt with by the Lightning plug which is on the end of the cable. What is on the end of the Apple device is not a USB connection but a Lightning connection. This is not a quibble over different connectors as there are electronic components inside the lightning plug which convert the signal from USB specs to Lightning specs. The same situation applies to the old dock-connector. nope. the usb controller is in the phone. the components in the lightning cable are for authentication and so that it can configure the port to function as a usb port. it does not translate anything. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 00:37:00 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: I suspect that one reason may be that Apple devices do not actually have a USB connection. yes they do. The handling of USB is dealt with by the Lightning plug which is on the end of the cable. What is on the end of the Apple device is not a USB connection but a Lightning connection. This is not a quibble over different connectors as there are electronic components inside the lightning plug which convert the signal from USB specs to Lightning specs. The same situation applies to the old dock-connector. nope. the usb controller is in the phone. the components in the lightning cable are for authentication and so that it can configure the port to function as a usb port. it does not translate anything. True, but it's not a USB port that is presented in the phone. It's a device capable of connecting to a Lightning plug. The lightning plug is on the end of a USB cable and converts the incoming USB data to a form where it can be handled via the Lightning plug and Lightning socket. Once it gets through the Lighning socket it is finally decoded by the phone firmware. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: The handling of USB is dealt with by the Lightning plug which is on the end of the cable. What is on the end of the Apple device is not a USB connection but a Lightning connection. This is not a quibble over different connectors as there are electronic components inside the lightning plug which convert the signal from USB specs to Lightning specs. The same situation applies to the old dock-connector. nope. the usb controller is in the phone. the components in the lightning cable are for authentication and so that it can configure the port to function as a usb port. it does not translate anything. True, but it's not a USB port that is presented in the phone. It's a device capable of connecting to a Lightning plug. The lightning plug is on the end of a USB cable and converts the incoming USB data to a form where it can be handled via the Lightning plug and Lightning socket. Once it gets through the Lighning socket it is finally decoded by the phone firmware. the cable does not convert anything. the lightning port configures itself to be a usb port and functions as one with the usb controller in the phone. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 02:19:59 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: The handling of USB is dealt with by the Lightning plug which is on the end of the cable. What is on the end of the Apple device is not a USB connection but a Lightning connection. This is not a quibble over different connectors as there are electronic components inside the lightning plug which convert the signal from USB specs to Lightning specs. The same situation applies to the old dock-connector. nope. the usb controller is in the phone. the components in the lightning cable are for authentication and so that it can configure the port to function as a usb port. it does not translate anything. True, but it's not a USB port that is presented in the phone. It's a device capable of connecting to a Lightning plug. The lightning plug is on the end of a USB cable and converts the incoming USB data to a form where it can be handled via the Lightning plug and Lightning socket. Once it gets through the Lighning socket it is finally decoded by the phone firmware. the cable does not convert anything. the lightning port configures itself to be a usb port and functions as one with the usb controller in the phone. I didn't previously want to go into too much detail but see: http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/157...patent-filings or http://tinyurl.com/o2yfzlw Notice item 410 'Accessory Hardware' in the final diagram. My understanding that's used to match the incoming data to the requirements of the Lightning socket. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , David Taylor wrote:
Sandman: Contrast this to any other mobile phone maker out there, that has changed connector a multitude of times over their entire product range over the years and we have yet another case of a person complaining about something Apple does that in the end, Apple has done a lot better than any of the alternative vendors. Within Europe, the micro USB is the standard connector for mobile phones, the Kindle, and many tablets too. Means you only need one charger and one lead type. One of the better decisions our politicians made. Indeed, an initiative that was carried out in 2009, prior to which phones had a multitude of connectors. Compliance is voluntary (as of now). The only non-compliant company is .... Apple. They do offer an adapter in Europe, and according to the EPS commission they are in compliance with the standard: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/...erence=E-2013- 001164&language=EN -- Sandman |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , nospam wrote:
In article , David Taylor David Taylor: Within Europe, the micro USB is the standard connector for mobile phones, the Kindle, and many tablets too. Means you only need one charger and one lead type. One of the better decisions our politicians made. The only non-compliant company is .... Apple. apple is fully compliant with european laws. This isn't a law, however. Compliance is voluntary. Having said that, the ESP commission regard Apple as compliant in this instance. -- Sandman |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , Andreas Skitsnack wrote:
Sandman: So why the change? Well, the Lightning connector is smaller which means it was important so that devices could be thinner and smaller as well. It's also a lot more intelligent and more versatile as connectors goes. Also, it's one of the very first data connectors you can insert either way up, which is also a nice bonus. Contrast this to any other mobile phone maker out there, that has changed connector a multitude of times over their entire product range over the years and we have yet another case of a person complaining about something Apple does that in the end, Apple has done a lot better than any of the alternative vendors. Not at all a comparable argument. Apple has two products - iPhone and iPad - that take similar charging systems. The 30 pin dock connector was launched with the iPod, and carried over to the iPhone and later the iPad. The Lighting connector replaced it due to technology advancements, and is now used for the iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and iPod Nano My iPhone and iPad do not use the same cord, but do use the same device that plugs into the wall. They don't use the same connector, no, since you bought one before the switch and the other after the switch. I was unaware that Apple had changed the plugs so both are the same on newer versions. I don't keep up on changes like this. There is no reason that I would know that Apple made a change on later models when I'm not dorky clerk that sells cords. No need - all you had to know was that when you bought your iPad you used your eyes and noticed that the connector for your iPhone and the connector for your iPad was physically different. You're making it seem like you had them for years and it was just sheer luck that led you to always connect the lightning conector to the iPad. Phones from other manufactuers are not a comparable situation because their cords connect to only one device. No they don't. Why are you making claims about how other vendors use their connectors when you don't even know what connectors Apple use? Stop making explicit statements you know nothing about. You can't play the ignorant victim of Apples connector upgrade and yet claim to know what connectors all other phones and tablets have used from other vendors. -- Sandman |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article , Andreas Skitsnack wrote:
Sandman: So why the change? Well, the Lightning connector is smaller which means it was important so that devices could be thinner and smaller as well. It's also a lot more intelligent and more versatile as connectors goes. Also, it's one of the very first data connectors you can insert either way up, which is also a nice bonus. Contrast this to any other mobile phone maker out there, that has changed connector a multitude of times over their entire product range over the years and we have yet another case of a person complaining about something Apple does that in the end, Apple has done a lot better than any of the alternative vendors. Andreas Skitsnack: Not at all a comparable argument. Apple has two products - iPhone and iPad - that take similar charging systems. My iPhone and iPad do not use the same cord, but do use the same device that plugs into the wall. nospam: only because you bought them around the time apple changed connectors, and also because you did no research on the product you were buying. What? What kind of nonsense is this? The two cords have different ends, but not at all because I did no research. That had nothing to do with it. The cords would have had different ends no matter what amount of research I did. No they wouldn't. If you had done your research and found out that Apple had switched the connector, you could have opted to buy an earlier model of the iPad that had a compatible connector. -- Sandman |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
In article ,
Sandman wrote: My iPhone and iPad do not use the same cord, but do use the same device that plugs into the wall. They don't use the same connector, no, since you bought one before the switch and the other after the switch. actually, he bought the 4s after the 5s came out, for 99 cents. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
A question for Applefans
On 9/15/2015 6:28 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Sandman wrote: My iPhone and iPad do not use the same cord, but do use the same device that plugs into the wall. They don't use the same connector, no, since you bought one before the switch and the other after the switch. actually, he bought the 4s after the 5s came out, for 99 cents. When did the 5s sell for 99 cents? For that matter, I doubt if the 4S did, either. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question for Applefans | nospam | Digital Photography | 136 | September 18th 15 01:19 AM |
A question for Applefans | nospam | Digital Photography | 14 | September 14th 15 05:09 PM |
A question for Applefans | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 7 | September 13th 15 02:28 AM |
A question for Applefans | PeterN[_6_] | Digital Photography | 1 | September 8th 15 11:49 PM |