If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Photoshop File Name
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:26:37 GMT, Matti Vuori wrote:
"PA" wrote in : Because TIFF is a more universal format than PSD and also has ISO certification IIRC. Thus more future proof and software independent. There is no certification, but a standard - and that does not matter anything. The TIFF format is a means of packaging "tagged" information (the first T) inside a file. But the information is sometimes proprietary. In Photoshop's case Photoshop is in many cases the only application that can read all content of a PS TIFF file! Wrong. That's why TIFF is a "standard". PhotoLine handles multi-layer/document TIFF files just fine. As do many other applications. Quit trying to make PhotoSlop out to be some legendary "holy grail" of editors. Like those that keep their nose in one book, the bible, they make themselves ignorant to what's already known by the rest of the world--long before PhotoSlop even implemented (stole) it. E.g. PhotoLine was the first program to incorporate HDR methods, the German to English translation putting it on their menus as "Combine Images", three years before any PhotoSlop users ever even heard of HDR techniques. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Photoshop File Name
"Matti Vuori" wrote in message
. 114... Because TIFF is a more universal format than PSD and also has ISO certification IIRC. Thus more future proof and software independent. There is no certification, but a standard - and that does not matter anything. The TIFF format is a means of packaging "tagged" information (the first T) inside a file. But the information is sometimes proprietary. In Photoshop's case Photoshop is in many cases the only application that can read all content of a PS TIFF file! A layered PSD file has much better probability of getting opened properly in the future than a layered TIFF file. I done a test a while back just to see how my TIFF files opened in something as bog standard the picture viewer that comes as standard with Windows. It opened 400MB TIFF files, with smart object original, other additional layers, adjustment layers, masks, smart filters, etc. perfectly. I tried it with a PSD, and it wouldn't open. Also, when I worked for a corporate, a huge amount of information was stored in TIFF's and PDF's, so there is no way the TIFF file format will ever be redundant. In other words, I'll stick with TIFF. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photoshop CS & RAW files from a Sony A300 dslr ARW file | ray | Digital Photography | 0 | February 8th 09 03:34 PM |
Saving NEF file as JPG in Photoshop 7 | bmoag | Digital Photography | 1 | January 30th 05 04:44 PM |
NEF file to Photoshop... | Randy Howard | Digital SLR Cameras | 15 | January 7th 05 08:01 PM |
Photoshop CS vs. Canon File Viewer Util | andre | Digital Photography | 13 | September 28th 04 06:10 AM |
RAW File Pentax *ist and Photoshop Elements | BobS | Digital Photography | 12 | August 25th 04 11:06 AM |