|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 15th 15, 09:24 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
40 vs 16MP
If you look at these samples of the new OM-D E-M5 Mark II:
16 MP http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100.HTM 40 MP (8-shot) http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM The gain in resolution is simply breathtaking. And if you look at the coloured Siemens stars, you will notice that there is also a lack of artifacts. So it's not only the resolution increase, but also the elimination of Bayer sensor artifacts (by capturing the full colour information at each pixel). -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site 
|
|
#2
February 15th 15, 02:59 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
On 02/15/2015 03:24 AM, Alfred Molon wrote:
www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM Post some working links
|
|
#3
February 15th 15, 03:50 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
On Sunday, February 15, 2015 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-8, philo wrote:
On 02/15/2015 03:24 AM, Alfred Molon wrote: www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM Post some working links Get a functional news reader or learn to work around the one you have. Dale B. Dalrymple
|
|
#5
February 15th 15, 04:04 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
Alfred Molon:
www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM philo: Post some working links If only he knew how to enclose a URL in brackets... http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100.HTM -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
|
|
#6
February 15th 15, 06:17 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
On 02/15/2015 09:50 AM, dbd wrote:
www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM I ***do*** know how to use a news reader and splice...the URL did not go through.
|
|
#7
February 15th 15, 06:56 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
In article , philo
wrote: www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM I ***do*** know how to use a news reader and splice...the URL did not go through. obviously not, since the links definitely worked and without the need to splice anything. had they been posted with delimiters, the links would have been clickable, but since they weren't, just copy all of the lines and paste into a browser. the browser will eliminate the line breaks.
|
|
#8
February 15th 15, 07:32 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
On 02/15/2015 12:56 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , philo wrote: www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM I ***do*** know how to use a news reader and splice...the URL did not go through. obviously not, since the links definitely worked and without the need to splice anything. had they been posted with delimiters, the links would have been clickable, but since they weren't, just copy all of the lines and paste into a browser. the browser will eliminate the line breaks. Yes for the 2nd time now. I know how to splice a link and when I did so it was no good. If you got it to work...which you didn't...you would have posted a working link.
|
|
#9
February 15th 15, 07:39 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
In article , philo
wrote: www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM I ***do*** know how to use a news reader and splice...the URL did not go through. obviously not, since the links definitely worked and without the need to splice anything. had they been posted with delimiters, the links would have been clickable, but since they weren't, just copy all of the lines and paste into a browser. the browser will eliminate the line breaks. Yes for the 2nd time now. I know how to splice a link and when I did so it was no good. obviously not, since it didn't work. again, no need to splice anything. copy all lines, paste, done. whatever you're doing is breaking the url. If you got it to work...which you didn't...you would have posted a working link. wrong on that too. as i said, copy/paste works. it would have been much better had the original link been properly delimited because it would have been clickable, no copy/paste needed at all.
|
|
#10
February 15th 15, 09:04 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
40 vs 16MP
In article , George Kerby
says... Learn to use BRACKETS brackets when posting a URL. Like this? http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100.HTM http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-e-m5- ii/FULLRES/EM52hVFAI00100_HR.HTM -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nikon D4 16MP as good as D3s in low light? | Rich[_6_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | January 6th 12 03:59 AM |
| 4mp doubled = 16mp!? | Bolshoy Huy | Digital Photography | 21 | March 22nd 06 12:23 PM |
Linear Mode
