If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
Matt Clara wrote:
[Snipped Text] There were two qualities of Miranda here though, up to the early eighties they were a manufacturer of good quality camera equipment. Then they got bought by Dixons, and were just branded cheap stuff from the far east. Unfortunately I bought the latter quality. Mind you, the actual quality of a picture is going to be controlled by the quality of the lens anyway. If the lens is going to produce a ****e image, then the rest doesn't really matter. Some folks with Holgas tend to disprove that. Jennifer Shaw's "Railroad Ties" is a good example: http://www.shotsmag.com/shots89-07.jpg Well, yes, but the applications are somewhat limited. It's a bit like a one trick filter. -- Andy Hewitt ** FAF#1, (Ex-OSOS#5) - FJ1200 ABS Windows free zone (Mac G5 Dual Processor) http://andyhewitt.webhop.net/ (updated Jan 2006) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
Andy Hewitt wrote:
Some folks with Holgas tend to disprove that. Jennifer Shaw's "Railroad Ties" is a good example: http://www.shotsmag.com/shots89-07.jpg Well, yes, but the applications are somewhat limited. It's a bit like a one trick filter. I've a feeling it would look better to my eyes if it were a bit sharper and less vignetted. At least if it were on a camera with a barely decent lens you could add your one trick filter or remove it at will. Pete -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
Sigma 135/1.8 but there are times when you need the speed, awful build
quality, glass fair. Nikon 43-86, early, non-AI. Traded it to some sucker for at 85/1.8! (So I guess it was a great lens since it got me just what I wanted. No name 35-70 in Canon mount (actually it had a name, but I had never heard of it!). Came with a Canon A-1 I bought at a pawn shop for $135 (this with motor MA). Lens so bad I did the Billie Joe McAllister thing a dropped it off a bridge (really!). -- darkroommike "Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message ink.net... The best and worst of anything are ultimately matters of taste and experience. As there is no accounting for taste and experience is what life deals you we should not argue about someone's nomination. What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Leaving out the plastic-fantastics: Dianas, Empire Babies and their cousins. My picks: o Cambridge 135mm f2.8 pre-set T-Mount. Uniformly fuzzy at all f-stops, could only be focused to a 'least fuzzy'. I bought it second hand, it was in like-new condition, now I am wary of 'mint' lenses. o Cambridge 400mm f6.3 {?} pre-set T-Mount. You would figure after one Cambridge, who would buy another ... o Schneider Xenar 150/5.6 of 70's vintage. This was, I am sure, a bad example but I went nuts trying to figure out why the pics were all bad, depth gauges - micrometers - pictures of newspaper pages, until I remembered: o Agfa Apotar/Solina, purchased with many months saving at age nine. The lens wasn't bad, but the focusing helix was frozen; new camera packed in orange tissue with a factory seal and the famous green-gunk disease had already hit -- the focusing ring turned but nothing happened. After a year of fuzzy pictures it hits - it's not my fault, it is the camera's. After I fixed it I obsessively kept re-checking the focus and adjusting the lens my microns until the screw threads stripped, then it was epoxy time and leave the lens alone. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com Fstop timer - http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/index.htm |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message
ink.net... The best and worst of anything are ultimately matters of taste and experience. As there is no accounting for taste and experience is what life deals you we should not argue about someone's nomination. What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Leaving out the plastic-fantastics: Dianas, Empire Babies and their cousins. I think the Russians/Ukrainians have that market sown up (with Chinese closing fast). One of the first SLRs I owned was a Zenit with some atrocious 58mm lens (whose name now mercifully escapes me) my father smuggled from Poland back in the early 70s. Well, it was great for portraits. It was the first in a series of Eastern European gems he brought back over the years including Kiev & Leningrad (or was it Stalingrad?) so I got to be pretty familiar with their "quality" which later helped me appreciate real quality. Natural Light Black and White Photography http://mysite.verizon.net/vze76ane/ -George- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
Nicholas O. Lindan wrote:
What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Maxxum 28-80xi -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message
ink.net... The best and worst of anything are ultimately matters of taste and experience. As there is no accounting for taste and experience is what life deals you we should not argue about someone's nomination. What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Leaving out the plastic-fantastics: Dianas, Empire Babies and their cousins. My picks: o Cambridge 135mm f2.8 pre-set T-Mount. Uniformly fuzzy at all f-stops, could only be focused to a 'least fuzzy'. I bought it second hand, it was in like-new condition, now I am wary of 'mint' lenses. o Cambridge 400mm f6.3 {?} pre-set T-Mount. You would figure after one Cambridge, who would buy another ... o Schneider Xenar 150/5.6 of 70's vintage. This was, I am sure, a bad example but I went nuts trying to figure out why the pics were all bad, depth gauges - micrometers - pictures of newspaper pages, until I remembered: o Agfa Apotar/Solina, purchased with many months saving at age nine. The lens wasn't bad, but the focusing helix was frozen; new camera packed in orange tissue with a factory seal and the famous green-gunk disease had already hit -- the focusing ring turned but nothing happened. After a year of fuzzy pictures it hits - it's not my fault, it is the camera's. After I fixed it I obsessively kept re-checking the focus and adjusting the lens my microns until the screw threads stripped, then it was epoxy time and leave the lens alone. The single worst lens I ever had contact with was a Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 that I bought my wife for Christmas, one year, on the recommendation of Shutterbug magazine. It was the last time I ever took a camera mag report seriously, and the last Sigma lens I ever bought. Number two on the hit list was a 400mm f8 "baseball bat" from a mail order house that age prevents me from remembering. It's probably the same lens as your Cambridge 400mm, except mine was an Exacta t mount. But I expected it to be awful, it was $60 new, and my wife bought it at a garage sale for $15. (Notice a common thread, here? Bad lenses/gifts?) -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
"Skip M" wrote in message
news:RefBf.12413$sA3.1965@fed1read02... [SNIP] The single worst lens I ever had contact with was a Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 that I bought my wife for Christmas, one year, on the recommendation of Shutterbug magazine. It was the last time I ever took a camera mag report seriously, and the last Sigma lens I ever bought. Number two on the hit list was a 400mm f8 "baseball bat" from a mail order house that age prevents me from remembering. It's probably the same lens as your Cambridge 400mm, except mine was an Exacta t mount. But I expected it to be awful, it was $60 new, and my wife bought it at a garage sale for $15. (Notice a common thread, here? Bad lenses/gifts?) I dunno Skip, I think she was just getting her revenge on you... Peter |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
In article . net,
Nicholas O. Lindan wrote: What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Leaving out the plastic-fantastics: Dianas, Empire Babies and their cousins. Got hold of a Mamiya C3 *real* cheap back in the early 90s, and it had an old-school Mamiya-Sekor 80mm, with the chrome bezel. We're talking NO contrast. I had to develop the bejeezus out of b&w, and anything color was a complete lost cause. It's amazing how much better the newer black-bezeled lens I now have is. Will -- Will Wagner / / http://www.ymb.net/ "Keep it simple: as simple as possible, but no simpler." -- A. Einstein |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message ink.net... What is/are the worst lens/es you every took a picture with? Leaving out the plastic-fantastics: Dianas, Empire Babies and their cousins. During much of my photo-hobby life, money was too dear to make ill-considered lens purchases, but I got nailed twice. 1. I bought a package of used lenses getting into Pentax 6x7. In the package was a Komura Telemore 2x doubler - so bad that you could see the defects though the viewfinder, or so I thought. You got low contrast, loss of sharpness, and color fringing all in one lens. I put a rock bottom price on it at a swap meet table and carried the guilt of selling it for several years. 2. A Yashica 635 MF TLR with the Yashinor [3 element] lens which preceded the later Yashinon.. [And the Yashinon was nothing to get worked up over either.] It may not have been any worse than any other 3-element lens, but it was the only one I ever owned. You could watch a medium format negative image fall apart when enlarged to a fill frame 11x14 print. Fortunately, I bought it at a forgiving shop which took it back. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The worst lens you ever had ... a collection of stories
Since this group is for medium format, I can't say I've ever had a
crappy lens. I've used Hasselblads since 1971 and you don't have a choice for lenses. In 35mm...anybody remember Lentar? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon digital bodies and Nikon lenses | Joseph Chamberlain, DDS | Digital SLR Cameras | 128 | November 20th 05 01:01 AM |
FS: Schneider Large-Format Lens TRADE!!! | Bill Gillooly | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 2 | February 20th 05 07:43 AM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 10:58 AM |
Copy/Macro Lens for this camera | Mr. Bill | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | February 16th 04 08:18 PM |
FS: Nikon F4, Nikkor Lens and accessories. | FocaIPoint | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 23rd 03 01:36 AM |