When you really wanted to have colour film loaded!

D'oh!

http://www.petezilla.co.uk/gallery/Oddments

Pete


--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk

Peter Chant wrote:

D'oh!

http://www.petezilla.co.uk/gallery/Oddments

Note, this chap was black with electric blue stripes - you can just make of
some of them out (translucent) on the left!

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk

Peter Chant wrote:
D'oh!

http://www.petezilla.co.uk/gallery/Oddments

Pete



Look on it as an excuse to have more than one camera body.

On May 1, 6:49 pm, Peter Chant wrote:
Peter Chant wrote:
D'oh!

http://www.petezilla.co.uk/gallery/Oddments

Note, this chap was black with electric blue stripes - you can just make of
some of them out (translucent) on the left!

--http://www.petezilla.co.uk

After scanning you could add back in the color with PS. But being able
to have two cameras loaded with two types of film, very nice. Then you
would need three camera bodies and lenses. One for color print, one
for color slide(transparency) and one for Black & White. Also a sherpa
to lug all the stuff around for you. ;-)

Keep at it Pete. The image was interesting even in B&W.

Draco

Draco wrote:

After scanning you could add back in the color with PS. But being able
to have two cameras loaded with two types of film, very nice. Then you
would need three camera bodies and lenses. One for color print, one
for color slide(transparency) and one for Black & White. Also a sherpa
to lug all the stuff around for you. ;-)

Also another three so you can have slow and fast films loaded!


Keep at it Pete. The image was interesting even in B&W.

Cheers, on reflection, if that guy was going to sit still long enough, and I
was not holding a TLR with a wide angle lens sideways (!) it would have
been interesting if I could have exposed to see the detail in the wings -
detail but in b&w.

BTW - rather off topic as it actually was MF - have you ever tried holding a
camera side on and using a waist level finder - really really
disorientating!

Pete

--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk